The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamical synapses causing self-organized criticality in neural networks
Open accessAbstract
Self-organized criticality1 is one of the key concepts to describe the emergence of complexity in natural systems. The concept asserts that a system self-organizes into a critical state where system observables are distributed according to a power law. Prominent examples of self-organized critical dynamics include piling of granular media2, plate tectonics3 and stick–slip motion4. Critical behaviour has been shown to bring about optimal computational capabilities5, optimal transmission6, storage of information7 and sensitivity to sensory stimuli8,9,10. In neuronal systems, the existence of critical avalanches was predicted11 and later observed experimentally6,12,13. However, whereas in the experiments generic critical avalanches were found, in the model of ref. 11 they only show up if the set of parameters is fine-tuned externally to a critical transition state. Here, we demonstrate analytically and numerically that by assuming (biologically more realistic) dynamical synapses14 in a spiking neural network, the neuronal avalanches turn from an exceptional phenomenon into a typical and robust self-organized critical behaviour, if the total resources of neurotransmitter are sufficiently large.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimal dynamical range of excitable networks at criticality
Kinouchi, O., & Copelli, M. (2006) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys289 · Cited by 831
Cited by
Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity
Breakspear, M. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4497 · Cited by 1,239
Emergent complex neural dynamics
Chialvo, D. R. (2010) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1803 · Cited by 1,165
The Temporal Structures and Functional Significance of Scale-free Brain Activity
He, B. J., Zempel, J. M., Snyder, A. Z., & Raichle, M. E. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.020 · Cited by 990
The Functional Benefits of Criticality in the Cortex
Shew, W. L., & Plenz, D. (2013) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858412445487 · Cited by 607
Self-organized criticality as a fundamental property of neural systems
Hesse, J., & Gross, T. (2014) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00166 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Levina, A., Herrmann, J. M., & Geisel, T.
- Venue
- Nature Physics
- Published
- 2007-11-18
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 857-860
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2481
- OpenAlex
- W2064481931
- Cited by
- 539
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.