Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 688

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anisotropic behaviours of massless Dirac fermions in graphene under periodic potentials

Open access
Park, Cheol-Hwan, Yang, Li, Son, Young-Woo, Cohen, Marvin L., Louie, Steven G.·2008·Nature Physics

Abstract

The propagation of charge carriers in graphene under an imposed periodic potential can become strongly anisotropic, suggesting a way of making electronic circuits with appropriately patterned surface electrodes without the need for cutting nanoscale structure into graphene. Graphene’s conical valence and conduction bands give rise to charge carriers that have neutrino-like linear energy dispersion and exhibit chiral behaviour near the Dirac points where these bands meet1,2,3,4,5,6. Such characteristics offer exciting opportunities for the occurrence of new phenomena and the development of high performance electronic devices. Making high quality devices from graphene, which typically involves etching it into nanoscale structures7,8,9,10, however, has proven challenging. Here we show that a periodic potential applied by suitably patterned modifications or contacts on graphene’s surface leads to further unexpected and potentially useful charge carrier behaviour. Owing to their chiral nature, the propagation of charge carriers through such a graphene superlattice is highly anisotropic, and in extreme cases results in group velocities that are reduced to zero in one direction but are unchanged in another. Moreover, we show that the density and type of carrier species (electron, hole or open orbit) in a graphene superlattice are extremely sensitive to the potential applied, and they may further be tuned by varying the Fermi level. As well as addressing fundamental questions about how the chiral massless Dirac fermions of graphene propagate in a periodic potential, our results suggest the possibility of building graphene electronic circuits from appropriately engineered periodic surface patterns, without the need for cutting or etching.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys890

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 688

Metadata

Authors
Park, C.-H., Yang, L., Son, Y.-W., Cohen, M. L., & Louie, S. G.
Venue
Nature Physics
Published
2008-02-24
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
213-217
ISSN
  • 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2481
OpenAlex
W2055193423
Cited by
688
References
25
FWCI
22.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.