Cited by 673Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health via WritingMental Health and Psychiatry

Automated analysis of free speech predicts psychosis onset in high-risk youths

Open access
Bedi, Gillinder, Carrillo, Facundo, Cecchi, Guillermo A, Slezak, Diego Fernández, Sigman, Mariano, Mota, Natália B, Ribeiro, Sidarta, Javitt, Daniel C +2 more·2015·npj Schizophrenia

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Psychiatry lacks the objective clinical tests routinely used in other specializations. Novel computerized methods to characterize complex behaviors such as speech could be used to identify and predict psychiatric illness in individuals. AIMS: In this proof-of-principle study, our aim was to test automated speech analyses combined with Machine Learning to predict later psychosis onset in youths at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis. Methods: Thirty-four CHR youths (11 females) had baseline interviews and were assessed quarterly for up to 2.5 years; five transitioned to psychosis. Using automated analysis, transcripts of interviews were evaluated for semantic and syntactic features predicting later psychosis onset. Speech features were fed into a convex hull classification algorithm with leave-one-subject-out cross-validation to assess their predictive value for psychosis outcome. The canonical correlation between the speech features and prodromal symptom ratings was computed. Results: Derived speech features included a Latent Semantic Analysis measure of semantic coherence and two syntactic markers of speech complexity: maximum phrase length and use of determiners (e.g., which ). These speech features predicted later psychosis development with 100% accuracy, outperforming classification from clinical interviews. Speech features were significantly correlated with prodromal symptoms. Conclusions: Findings support the utility of automated speech analysis to measure subtle, clinically relevant mental state changes in emergent psychosis. Recent developments in computer science, including natural language processing, could provide the foundation for future development of objective clinical tests for psychiatry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npjschz.2015.30

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bedi, G., Carrillo, F., Cecchi, G. A., Slezak, D. F., Sigman, M., Mota, N. B., Ribeiro, S., Javitt, D. C., Copelli, M., & Corcoran, C. M.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
  • IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center (US)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR)
Corresponding author
  • Cecchi, Guillermo A
  • Corcoran, Cheryl M
Venue
npj Schizophrenia
Published
2015-08-26
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
15030-15030
ISSN
2334-265X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1267646904
Cited by
673
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 103 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 2
FWCI
25.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repositorio Digital Universidad Torcuato Di Tella (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2013-07699-0)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000040)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH086385, K23MH066279, R21MH086125)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K23DA034877)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (TR000040)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
automated speech analysis, psychosis onset prediction, prodromal psychosis, latent semantic analysis, syntactic complexity, semantic coherence, natural language processing, prodromal symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review