Cited by 227Digital Mental Health InterventionsEthics in Clinical ResearchEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Data mining for health: staking out the ethical territory of digital phenotyping

Open access
Martinez-Martin, Nicole, Insel, Thomas R., Dagum, Paul, Greely, Henry T., Cho, Mildred K.·2018·npj Digital Medicine

Abstract

Digital phenotyping uses smartphone and wearable signals to measure cognition, mood, and behavior. This promising new approach has been developed as an objective, passive assessment tool for the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness. Digital phenotyping is currently used with informed consent in research studies but is expected to expand to broader uses in healthcare and direct-to-consumer applications. Digital phenotyping could involve the collection of massive amounts of individual data and potential creation of new categories of health and risk assessment data. Because existing ethical and regulatory frameworks for the provision of mental healthcare do not clearly apply to digital phenotyping, it is critical to consider its possible ethical, legal, and social implications. This paper addresses four major areas where guidelines and best practices will be helpful: transparency, informed consent, privacy, and accountability. It will be important to consider these issues early in the development of this new approach so that its promise is not limited by harmful effects or unintended consequences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-018-0075-8

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital interventions provide additional advantages including real-time and longitudinal patient data, potentially leading to more accurate diagnosis and treatment decisions, moment-to-moment monitoring, and timely interventions.

    “Additional advantages include the provision of real-time and longitudinal patient data, potentially leading to a more accurate diagnosis and treatment decisions, moment-to-moment monitoring, and timely interventions [13].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinez-Martin, N., Insel, T. R., Dagum, P., Greely, H. T., & Cho, M. K.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2018-12-19
Volume
1
Issue
1
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2905393963
Cited by
218
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1
FWCI
21.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Human Genome Research Institute (T32HG008953)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
digital phenotyping, mental health, informed consent, privacy, transparency, accountability, wearable devices, smartphone data, mental illness diagnosis, data protection, moral norms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review