Cited by 142Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 18 of the 46 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Ketamine for Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial

Open access

Abstract

Many patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) experience inadequate symptom relief from available treatments. Ketamine is a potent N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist with a potentially novel mechanism of action for the treatment of anxiety disorders. Therefore, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial in 18 adults with DSM-5 SAD and compared the effects between intravenous ketamine (0.5 mg/kg over 40 min) and placebo (normal saline) on social phobia symptoms. Ketamine and placebo infusions were administered in a random order with a 28-day washout period between infusions. Ratings of anxiety were assessed 3-h post-infusion and followed for 14 days. We used linear mixed models to assess the impact of ketamine and placebo on anxiety symptoms. Outcomes were blinded ratings on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) and self-reported anxiety on a visual analog scale (VAS-Anxiety). We also used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare the proportion of treatment responders. Based on prior studies, we defined response as a greater than 35% LSAS reduction and 50% VAS-Anxiety reduction. We found ketamine resulted in a significantly greater reduction in anxiety relative to placebo on the LSAS (Time × Treatment: F 9,115 =2.6, p=0.01) but not the VAS-Anxiety (Time × Treatment: F 10,141 =0.4, p=0.95). Participants were significantly more likely to exhibit a treatment response after ketamine infusion relative to placebo in the first 2 weeks fol…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2017.194

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

18 of 46 cited sources checked · 9 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 19
32 of 32
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The modification of the LSAS to ask about symptoms since the previous assessment does not invalidate its use as a measure of social anxiety.

    “LSAS typically assesses symptoms during the prior week; however, the scale was modified so that participants were asked about their symptoms during the time since previous assessment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Blinding of participants and raters was maintained despite ketamine's dissociative side effects.

    “Also, participants were instructed to not discuss any aspects of the infusion with blinded raters in order to avoid inadvertent unblinding by the patient discussing dissociative symptoms that frequently occurred during ketamine infusions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Inadequate anxiety relief in patients with SAD is a source of substantial morbidity, distress, and decreases in quality of life.

    “Inadequate anxiety relief in patients with SAD is a source of substantial morbidity, distress, and decreases in quality of life.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    This is the first placebo-controlled study to investigate ketamine's efficacy in patients with a DSM-5 anxiety disorder.

    “To our knowledge, this is the first placebo-controlled study to investigate ketamine's efficacy in patients with a DSM-5 anxiety disorder.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentz = 2.24reported p = .025 · recomputed p = .025

    “z = 2.24, p = .025”

  • Consistentz = 2.12reported p = .034 · recomputed p = .034

    “z = 2.12, p = .034”

2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • Overall baseline VAS mean does not match the two infusion-order groups

    Minor

    The two groups each contain nine participants, so their reported VAS-Anxiety means imply an overall mean of 52.50, not 50.00.

    Reported 50 · recomputed 52.5

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Aitken RC (1969). Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med 62: 989.
  2. Taylor JH, Lebowitz ER, Silverman WK . Anxiety Disorders. In A. Martin, M.H. Bloch, F.R. Volkmar (eds.), Lewis’s child and adolescent psychiatry: A comprehensive textbook. 5th edition. Wolters Kluwer: Philadelphia, PA, 2017a, pp. 509–518..

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 142

Metadata

Authors
Taylor, J. H., Landeros-Weisenberger, A., Coughlin, C., Mulqueen, J., Johnson, J. A., Gabriel, D., Reed, M. O., Jakubovski, E., & Bloch, M. H.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Jerome H
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2017-08-29
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
325-333
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2752700145
Cited by
142
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
FWCI
7.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert E. Leet and Clara Guthrie Patterson Trust
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH091240, T32MH019112, R25MH077823, T32MH019961, T32MH018268)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
ketamine, social anxiety disorder, NMDA receptor antagonists, intravenous infusion, anxiety symptoms, treatment response, Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Ketamine, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Cross-Over Studies, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review