Cited by 1,090Cell Image Analysis TechniquesSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cell Painting, a high-content image-based assay for morphological profiling using multiplexed fluorescent dyes

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In morphological profiling, quantitative data are extracted from microscopy images of cells to identify biologically relevant similarities and differences among samples based on these profiles. This protocol describes the design and execution of experiments using Cell Painting, which is a morphological profiling assay that multiplexes six fluorescent dyes, imaged in five channels, to reveal eight broadly relevant cellular components or organelles. Cells are plated in multiwell plates, perturbed with the treatments to be tested, stained, fixed, and imaged on a high-throughput microscope. Next, an automated image analysis software identifies individual cells and measures ∼1,500 morphological features (various measures of size, shape, texture, intensity, and so on) to produce a rich profile that is suitable for the detection of subtle phenotypes. Profiles of cell populations treated with different experimental perturbations can be compared to suit many goals, such as identifying the phenotypic impact of chemical or genetic perturbations, grouping compounds and/or genes into functional pathways, and identifying signatures of disease. Cell culture and image acquisition takes 2 weeks; feature extraction and data analysis take an additional 1-2 weeks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2016.105

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Guyon, I. & Elisseeff, A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1157–1182 (2003).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bray, M.-A., Singh, S., Han, H., Davis, C. T., Borgeson, B., Hartland, C., Kost-Alimova, M., Gustafsdottir, S. M., Gibson, C. C., & Carpenter, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Recursion (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gibson, Christopher C
  • Carpenter, Anne E
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2016-08-25
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
1757-1774
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W2498090354
Cited by
1,090
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 180 · 2025: 205 · 2024: 191 · 2023: 143 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 4
FWCI
20.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1119830, 1148823, CAREER)
  • University of Utah
  • Broad Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH-R01, R44TR001197, GM089652, NIH R01 GM089652)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM089652)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Keywords
Cell Painting, morphological profiling, high-content imaging, cell morphology, automated image analysis, chemical perturbation, gene perturbation, disease signatures, high-throughput imaging
MeSH terms
Fluorescent Dyes, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Staining and Labeling, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Size, Cell Shape, Molecular Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review