Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 336

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strategic and practical guidelines for successful structured illumination microscopy

Open access
Demmerle, Justin, Innocent, Cassandravictoria, North, Alison J, Ball, Graeme, Müller, Marcel, Miron, Ezequiel, Matsuda, Atsushi, Dobbie, Ian M, Markaki, Yolanda, Schermelleh, Lothar·2017·Nature Protocols

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2017.019

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 336

Metadata

Authors
Demmerle, J., Innocent, C., North, A. J., Ball, G., Müller, M., Miron, E., Matsuda, A., Dobbie, I. M., Markaki, Y., & Schermelleh, L.
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2017-04-13
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
988-1010
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W2606405434
Cited by
336
References
33
FWCI
18.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategic and practical guidelines for successful structured illumination microscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nprot.2017.019
The paper
Demmerle, J., Innocent, C., North, A. J., Ball, G., Müller, M., Miron, E., Matsuda, A., Dobbie, I. M., Markaki, Y., & Schermelleh, L. (2017). Strategic and practical guidelines for successful structured illumination microscopy. Nature Protocols. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.