The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biomarkers of response and resistance to antiangiogenic therapy
Open accessAbstract
No validated biological markers (or biomarkers) currently exist for appropriately selecting patients with cancer for antiangiogenic therapy. Nor are there biomarkers identifying escape pathways that should be targeted after tumors develop resistance to a given antiangiogenic agent. A number of potential systemic, circulating, tissue and imaging biomarkers have emerged from recently completed phase I-III studies. Some of these are measured at baseline (for example VEGF polymorphisms), others are measured during treatment (such as hypertension, MRI-measured K(trans), circulating angiogenic molecules or collagen IV), and all are mechanistically based. Some of these biomarkers might be pharmacodynamic (for example, increase in circulating VEGF, placental growth factor) while others have potential for predicting clinical benefit or identifying the escape pathways (for example, stromal-cell-derived factor 1alpha, interleukin-6). Most biomarkers are disease and/or agent specific and all of them need to be validated prospectively. We discuss the current challenges in establishing biomarkers of antiangiogenic therapy, define systemic, circulating, tissue and imaging biomarkers and their advantages and disadvantages, and comment on the future opportunities for validating biomarkers of antiangiogenic therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“no validated biomarkers are available to guide the use of antiangiogenic drugs7,126.”
From Enhancing cancer immunotherapy using antiangiogenics: opportunities and challenges (2018) · cites this paper as [126]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Llovet, J. M., Ricci, S., Mazzaferro, V., Hilgard, P., Gane, E., Blanc, J.-F., de Oliveira, A. C., Santoro, A., Raoul, J.-L., Forner, A., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0708857 · Cited by 13,097
Bevacizumab plus Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Hurwitz, H., Fehrenbacher, L., Novotny, W., Cartwright, T., Hainsworth, J., Heim, W., Berlin, J., Baron, A., Griffing, S., Holmgren, E., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032691 · Cited by 10,968
Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications
Sherwood, L. M., Parris, E. E., & Folkman, J. (1971) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197111182852108 · Cited by 10,187
Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases
Carmeliet, P., & Jain, R. K. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35025220 · Cited by 9,070
Self-citationPaclitaxel–Carboplatin Alone or with Bevacizumab for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Sandler, A., Gray, R., Perry, M. C., Brahmer, J., Schiller, J. H., Dowlati, A., Lilenbaum, R., & Johnson, D. H. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa061884 · Cited by 5,761
Sunitinib versus Interferon Alfa in Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Motzer, R. J., Hutson, T. E., Tomczak, P., Michaelson, M. D., Bukowski, R. M., Rixe, O., Oudard, S. M., Négrier, S., Szczylik, C. A., Kim, S. T., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa065044 · Cited by 5,752
Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
정, 재. (2008) · Cited by 5,586
Normalization of Tumor Vasculature: An Emerging Concept in Antiangiogenic Therapy
Jain, R. K. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104819 · Cited by 5,527
Self-citationSorafenib in Advanced Clear-Cell Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Escudier, B. J., Eisen, T. G., Stadler, W. M., Szczylik, C. A., Oudard, S. M., Siebels, M., Négrier, S., Chevreau, C., Solska, E., Desai, A. A., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa060655 · Cited by 4,802
K-ras Mutations and Benefit from Cetuximab in Advanced Colorectal Cancer
Karapetis, C. S., Khambata-Ford, S., Jonker, D. J., O'Callaghan, C. J., Tu, D., Tebbutt, N. C., Simes, R. J., Chalchal, H., Shapiro, J. D., Robitaille, S., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0804385 · Cited by 3,622
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis
Carmeliet, P., & Jain, R. K. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10144 · Cited by 5,467
Self-citationBasic and Therapeutic Aspects of Angiogenesis
Potente, M., Gerhardt, H., & Carmeliet, P. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.039 · Cited by 2,771
Enhancing cancer immunotherapy using antiangiogenics: opportunities and challenges
Fukumura, D., Kloepper, J., Amoozgar, Z., Duda, D. G., & Jain, R. K. (2018) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2018.29 · Cited by 2,027
Self-citationTumor angiogenesis: molecular pathways and therapeutic targets
Weis, S. M., & Cheresh, D. A. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2537 · Cited by 1,762
Normalization of the Vasculature for Treatment of Cancer and Other Diseases
Goel, S., Duda, D. G., Xu, L., Munn, L. L., Boucher, Y., Fukumura, D., & Jain, R. K. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00038.2010 · Cited by 1,605
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jain, R. K., Duda, D. G., Willett, C. G., Sahani, D. V., Zhu, A. X., Loeffler, J. S., Batchelor, T. T., & Sorensen, A. G.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jain, Rakesh K.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 327-338
- ISSN
- 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-4782
- PMC
- PMC3057433
- OpenAlex
- W1993016882
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 67
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA115767, R01CA57683, R01 CA 85140, R21CA117079, R01CA085140, R01CA057683, R21-CA 99237, P01CA080124, R21CA099237, R01CA126642, K24CA125440, R01CA129371, P01-CA-80124)
- National Center for Research Resources (P41-RR-14075, M01RR001066, P41RR014075, M01-RR01066)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Keywords
- anti-angiogenic therapy, biomarkers, treatment response, drug resistance, patient selection, VEGF polymorphisms, type IV collagen, pharmacodynamic biomarkers, imaging biomarkers, Ktrans, placental growth factor, stromal cell-derived factor-1α, interleukin-6, tumor stroma
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Neoplasms, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Biomarkers, Tumor, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
