Cited by 20Lipid metabolism and disordersAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

ANGPTL4 — the link binding obesity and glucose intolerance

Morris, Alan·2018·Nature Reviews Endocrinology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrendo.2018.35

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morris, A.
Corresponding author
Morris, Alan
Venue
Nature Reviews Endocrinology
Published
2018-04-03
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
251-251
ISSN
  • 1759-5029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5037
OpenAlex
W2795937591
Cited by
20
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
ANGPTL4, angiopoietin-like proteins, obesity, impaired glucose tolerance, lipoprotein lipase, pancreatic lipase, lipid metabolism, cardiometabolic dysfunction, lipolysis, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Angiopoietin-Like Protein 4, Animals, Diet, Humans, Obesity, Glucose Intolerance, Angiopoietins, Mice, Obesity, Abdominal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review