The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of primate gene expression
Abstract
It has been suggested that evolutionary changes in gene expression account for most phenotypic differences between species, in particular between humans and apes. What general rules can be described governing expression evolution? We find that a neutral model where negative selection and divergence time are the major factors is a useful null hypothesis for both transcriptome and genome evolution. Two tissues that stand out with regard to gene expression are the testes, where positive selection has exerted a substantial influence in both humans and chimpanzees, and the brain, where gene expression has changed less than in other organs but acceleration might have occurred in human ancestors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, comparative microarray studies have shown a high degree of conservation across species in overall gene expression, although there is considerable upregulation of brain gene expression in humans compared to non-human primates (Khaitovich et al., 2006; Preuss et al., 2004; Vallender et al., 2008).”
From Large-Scale Cellular-Resolution Gene Profiling in Human Neocortex Reveals Species-Specific Molecular Signatures (2012) · cites this paper as Khaitovich et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.
Tajima, F. (1989) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/123.3.585 · Cited by 14,056
Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors
Margulies, M., Egholm, M., Altman, W. E., Attiya, S., Bader, J. S., Bemben, L. A., Berka, J., Braverman, M. S., Chen, Y.-J., Chen, Z., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03959 · Cited by 7,693
The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution
Kimura, M. (1979) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1179-98 · Cited by 7,687
The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution
Kimura, M. (1983) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623486 · Cited by 6,300
A haplotype map of the human genome
The International HapMap Consortium (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04226 · Cited by 5,858
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection
Livezey, R. L., & Darwin, C. R. (1953) · The American Midland Naturalist · doi:10.2307/2485224 · Cited by 5,431
The Design and Implementation of FFTW3
Frigo, M., & Johnson, S. G. (2005) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2004.840301 · Cited by 5,086
Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.
Fu, Y., & Li, W. (1993) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/133.3.693 · Cited by 4,067
Evolutionary Rate at the Molecular Level
KIMURA, M. (1968) · Nature · doi:10.1038/217624a0 · Cited by 3,747
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The evolution of gene expression levels in mammalian organs
Brawand, D., Soumillon, M., Necsulea, A., Julien, P., Csárdi, G., Harrigan, P., Weier, M., Liechti, A., Aximu-Petri, A., Kircher, M., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10532 · Cited by 1,248
Self-citationJohnson, M. B., Kawasawa, Y. I., Mason, C. E., Krsnik, Ž., Coppola, G., Bogdanović, D., Geschwind, D. H., Mane, S. M., State, M. W., & Šestan, N. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.03.027 · Cited by 603
Conservation and evolution of gene coexpression networks in human and chimpanzee brains
Oldham, M. C., Horvath, S., & Geschwind, D. H. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605938103 · Cited by 566
Cortical Evolution: Judge the Brain by Its Cover
Geschwind, D. H., & Rakic, P. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.045 · Cited by 519
Comparative studies of gene expression and the evolution of gene regulation
Romero, I. G., Ruvinsky, I., & Gilad, Y. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3229 · Cited by 488
Metadata
- Authors
- Khaitovich, P., Enard, W., Lachmann, M., & Pääbo, S.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Pääbo, Svante
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Genetics
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 693-702
- ISSN
- 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0064
- OpenAlex
- W2099451735
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 131
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- gene expression evolution, primate evolution, human-chimpanzee divergence, transcriptome evolution, genome evolution, positive selection, negative selection, divergence time, testis, brain, phenotypic evolution, neutral model
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Biological Evolution, Humans, Male, Mutation, Primates, Selection, Genetic, Species Specificity, Testis, Gene Expression, Genome, Human, Evolution, Molecular, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review