Cited by 582Immune Response and InflammationInvertebrate Immune Response MechanismsT-cell and B-cell Immunology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toll-like receptors — taking an evolutionary approach

Open access
Leulier, François, Lemaitre, Bruno·2008·Nature Reviews Genetics

Abstract

The Toll receptor was initially identified in Drosophila melanogaster for its role in embryonic development. Subsequently, D. melanogaster Toll and mammalian Toll-like receptors (TLRs) have been recognized as key regulators of immune responses. After ten years of intense research on TLRs and the recent accumulation of genomic and functional data in diverse organisms, we review the distribution and functions of TLRs in the animal kingdom. We provide an evolutionary perspective on TLRs, which sheds light on their origin at the dawn of animal evolution and suggests that different TLRs might have been co-opted independently during animal evolution to mediate analogous immune functions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrg2303

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 131 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hultmark, D. Insect lysozymes. EXS 75, 87–102 (1996).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 582

Metadata

Authors
Leulier, F., & Lemaitre, B.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2008-03
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
165-178
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W2070793039
Cited by
581
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 34
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
Toll-like receptors, immune system evolution, innate immunity, embryonic development, invertebrate immunity, vertebrate immunity, convergent evolution, animal evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Evolution, Molecular, Toll-Like Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review