The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data
Open accessAbstract
How DNA is organized in three dimensions inside the cell nucleus and how this affects the ways in which cells access, read and interpret genetic information are among the longest standing questions in cell biology. Using newly developed molecular, genomic and computational approaches based on the chromosome conformation capture technology (such as 3C, 4C, 5C and Hi-C), the spatial organization of genomes is being explored at unprecedented resolution. Interpreting the increasingly large chromatin interaction data sets is now posing novel challenges. Here we describe several types of statistical and computational approaches that have recently been developed to analyse chromatin interaction data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Polymorphic cis-REs have been shown to influence CTCF binding (71, 72) and DNA looping (73).”
From Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region–Specific Expression and Social Attachment (2016) · cites this paper as [73]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11247 · Cited by 18,072
Self-citationComprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding Principles of the Human Genome
Lieberman-Aiden, E., van Berkum, N. L., Williams, L., Imakaev, M., Ragoczy, T., Telling, A., Amit, I., Lajoie, B. R., Sabo, P. J., Dorschner, M. O., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181369 · Cited by 8,898
Self-citationTopological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions
Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J. S., & Ren, B. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11082 · Cited by 6,829
Rubinstein, M., & Colby, R. H. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198520597.001.0001 · Cited by 5,686
Capturing Chromosome Conformation
Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M., & Kleckner, N. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1067799 · Cited by 3,652
Self-citationSpatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre
Nora, E. P., Lajoie, B. R., Schulz, E. G., Giorgetti, L., Okamoto, I., Servant, N., Piolot, T., van Berkum, N. L., Meisig, J., Sedat, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11049 · Cited by 2,895
Self-citationThe accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome
Thurman, R. E., Rynes, E., Humbert, R., Vierstra, J., Maurano, M. T., Haugen, E., Sheffield, N. C., Stergachis, A. B., Wang, H., Vernot, B., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11232 · Cited by 2,679
Self-citationChromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells
Cremer, T. J., & Cremer, C. G. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35066075 · Cited by 2,423
Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions
Guelen, L., Pagie, L., Brasset, É., Meuleman, W. R. A., Faza, M. B., Talhout, W., Eussen, B. H. J., de Klein, A., Wessels, L. F. A., de Laat, W. L., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06947 · Cited by 2,042
Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome
Sexton, T., Yaffe, E., Kenigsberg, E., Bantignies, F., Leblanc, B., Hoichman, M., Parrinello, H., Tanay, A., & Cavalli, G. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.010 · Cited by 1,983
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 998
CHiCAGO: Robust Detection of DNA Looping Interactions in Capture Hi-C dataPreprint
Cairns, J., Freire-Pritchett, P., Wingett, S., Várnai, C., Dimond, A., Plagnol, V., Zerbino, D. R., Schoenfelder, S., Javierre, B. M., Osborne, C. S., et al. (2015) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/028068 · Cited by 47
Principles of 3D chromosome folding and evolutionary genome reshuffling in mammals
Álvarez-González, L., Arias‐Sardá, C., Montes-Espuña, L., Marín-Gual, L., Vara, C., Lister, N. C., Cuartero, Y., Garcia, F., Deakin, J. E., Renfree, M. B., et al. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111839 · Cited by 45
Hi-C Chromatin Interaction Networks Predict Co-expression in the Mouse Cortex
Babaei, S., Mahfouz, A. E., Hulsman, M., Lelieveldt, B. P. F., de Ridder, J., & Reinders, M. J. T. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004221 · Cited by 45
Chromosomes at Work: Organization of Chromosome Territories in the Interphase Nucleus
Fritz, A. J., Barutcu, A. R., Martin‐Buley, L. A., van Wijnen, A. J., Zaidi, S. K., Imbalzano, A. N., Lian, J. B., Stein, J. L., & Stein, G. S. (2015) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.25280 · Cited by 53
Shi, G., & Thirumalai, D. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11897-0 · Cited by 48
Liu, X., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, N., Botten, G. A., Cao, H., Orkin, S. H., Zhang, M. Q., & Xu, J. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-01973-w · Cited by 44
Euchromatin Activity Enhances Segregation and Compaction of Heterochromatin in the Cell Nucleus
Mahajan, A., Yan, W., Zidovska, A., Saintillan, D., & Shelley, M. (2022) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.041033 · Cited by 44
Higgins, G. A., Allyn-Feuer, A., Barbour, E., & Athey, B. D. (2015) · Pharmacogenomics · doi:10.2217/pgs.15.106 · Cited by 46
Entering the Next Dimension: Plant Genomes in 3D
Sotelo-Silveira, M., Montes, R. A. C., Sotelo-Silveira, J. R., Marsch‐Martínez, N., & de Folter, S. (2018) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2018.03.014 · Cited by 45
Carlson, J. C., Anand, D., Butali, A., Buxó, C. J., Christensen, K., Deleyiannis, F. W. ‐., Hecht, J. T., Moreno, L. M., Orioli, I. M., Padilla, C. D., et al. (2019) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.22214 · Cited by 46
Ma, X., Chen, T., Peng, Z., Wang, Z., Liu, J., Yang, T., Wu, L., Liu, G., Zhou, M., Tong, M., et al. (2021) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2020106632 · Cited by 44
Imaging Transcription: Past, Present, and FuturePreprint
Coleman, R. A., Liu, Z. J., Darzacq, X., Tjian, R., Singer, R. H., & Lionnet, T. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.2015.80.027201 · Cited by 41
Majumder, K., Wang, J., Boftsi, M., Fuller, M. S., Rede, J. E., Joshi, T., & Pintel, D. J. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.37750 · Cited by 41
Li, F., Wang, D., Song, R., Cao, C., Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Li, X., Huang, J., Liu, Q., Hou, N., et al. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02095-z · Cited by 42
cPKC regulates interphase nuclear size duringXenopusdevelopment
Edens, L. J., & Levy, D. L. (2014) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201406004 · Cited by 44
Chromosome Architecture and Genome Organization
Bernardi, G. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143739 · Cited by 41
Chromatin interactions and candidate genes at ten prostate cancer risk loci
Du, M., Tillmans, L. S., Gao, J., Gao, P. H., Yuan, T., Dittmar, R. L., Song, W., Yang, Y., Sahr, N. A., Wang, T., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep23202 · Cited by 40
A Polymer Model for the Quantitative Reconstruction of Chromosome Architecture from HiC and GAM Data
Treut, G. L., Képès, F., & Orland, H. (2018) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2018.10.032 · Cited by 38
Trzaskoma, P., Ruszczycki, B., Lee, B., Pels, K. K., Krawczyk, K., Bokota, G., Szczepankiewicz, A. A., Aaron, J., Walczak, A., Śliwińska, M. A., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15987-2 · Cited by 43
Chromatin’s thread to alternative splicing regulation
Iannone, C., & Valcárcel, J. (2013) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/s00412-013-0425-x · Cited by 44
Rapid generation of endogenously driven transcriptional reporters in cells through CRISPR/Cas9
Rojas‐Fernández, A., Herhaus, L., Macartney, T., Lachaud, C., Hay, R. T., & Sapkota, G. P. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep09811 · Cited by 41
LncVar: a database of genetic variation associated with long non-coding genes
Chen, X., Hao, Y., Cui, Y., Fan, Z., He, S., Luo, J., & Chen, R. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw581 · Cited by 42
Statics and dynamics of DNA knotting
Orlandini, E. (2017) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa9a4c · Cited by 42
Rivas, M. A., Meydan, C., Chin, C. R., Challman, M. F., Kim, D., Bhinder, B., Kloetgen, A., Viny, A. D., Teater, M. R., McNally, D. R., et al. (2021) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-020-00827-8 · Cited by 40
Non-coding RNAs and chromatin domains
Yamamoto, T., & Saitoh, N. (2019) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2018.12.005 · Cited by 44
Predictive modelling of gene expression from transcriptional regulatory elements
Budden, D., Hurley, D., & Crampin, E. J. (2014) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbu034 · Cited by 41
Moore, B. L., Aitken, S., & Semple, C. A. M. (2015) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0661-x · Cited by 40
Belton, J.-M., Lajoie, B. R., Audibert, S., Cantaloube, S., Lassadi, I., Goiffon, I., Baù, D., Martı́-Renom, M. A., Bystricky, K., & Dekker, J. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.10.063 · Cited by 41
Self-citationChen, Y., Wang, Y., Xuan, Z., Chen, M., & Zhang, M. Q. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw225 · Cited by 41
Bhatia, S., & Kleinjan, D. A. (2014) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-014-1424-6 · Cited by 42
Functional characterization of the 12p12.1 renal cancer-susceptibility locus implicates BHLHE41
Bigot, P., Colli, L. M., Machiela, M. J., Jessop, L., Myers, T. A., Carrouget, J., Wagner, S. A., Roberson, D., Eymerit-Morin, C., Henrion, D., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12098 · Cited by 41
The Current Status and Challenges in Computational Analysis of Genomic Big Data
Qin, Y., Yalamanchili, H. K., Qin, J., Yan, B., & Wang, J. (2015) · Big Data Research · doi:10.1016/j.bdr.2015.02.005 · Cited by 40
Chromosome topology guides the Drosophila Dosage Compensation Complex for target gene activation
Schauer, T., Ghavi-Helm, Y., Sexton, T., Albig, C., Regnard, C., Cavalli, G., Furlong, E. E. M., & Becker, P. B. (2017) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.201744292 · Cited by 46
Ma, Q., Yang, F., Mackintosh, C., Jayani, R. S., Oh, S., Jin, C., Nair, S. J., Merkurjev, D., Ma, W., Allen, S., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107532 · Cited by 37
Banerjee, A. R., Kim, Y. J., & Kim, T. H. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1018 · Cited by 39
Szczurek, A., Klewes, L., Xing, J. W., Gourram, A., Birk, U. J., Knecht, H., Dobrucki, J. W., Mai, S., & Cremer, C. G. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1301 · Cited by 39
Assembling nuclear domains: Lessons from DNA repair
Schrank, B. R., & Gautier, J. (2019) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201904202 · Cited by 39
A chromosomal connectome for psychiatric and metabolic risk variants in adult dopaminergic neurons
Espeso‐Gil, S., Halene, T. B., Bendl, J. M., Kassim, B. S., Hutta, G. B., Iskhakova, M., Shokrian, N., Auluck, P. K., Javidfar, B., Rajarajan, P., et al. (2020) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-020-0715-x · Cited by 35
Illuminating the “Black Box” of Progesterone-Dependent Embryo Implantation Using Engineered Mice
Maurya, V. K., DeMayo, F. J., & Lydon, J. P. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.640907 · Cited by 39
Tornesello, M. L., Cerasuolo, A., Starita, N., Amiranda, S., Bonelli, P., Tuccillo, F. M., Buonaguro, F. M., Buonaguro, L., & Tornesello, A. L. (2023) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2023.1286683 · Cited by 40
Pietal, M. J., Bujnicki, J. M., & Kozlowski, L. P. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv390 · Cited by 38
Entropy gives rise to topologically associating domains
Vásquez, P. A., Hult, C., Adalsteinsson, D., Lawrimore, J., Forest, M. G., & Bloom, K. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw510 · Cited by 37
SMC complexes orchestrate the mitotic chromatin interaction landscape
Kakui, Y., & Uhlmann, F. (2017) · Current Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00294-017-0755-y · Cited by 37
Chromatin and Cytoskeletal Tethering Determine Nuclear Morphology in Progerin-Expressing Cells
Lionetti, M. C., Bonfanti, S., Fumagalli, M. R., Budrikis, Z., Font-Clos, F., Costantini, G., Chepizhko, O., Zapperi, S., & Porta, C. A. M. L. (2020) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2020.04.001 · Cited by 38
The self-stirred genome: large-scale chromatin dynamics, its biophysical origins and implications
Zidovska, A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2020.03.008 · Cited by 39
Predicting Genome Architecture: Challenges and Solutions
Belokopytova, P. S., & Fishman, V. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.617202 · Cited by 36
Parlez-vous VUS?Preprint
Cooper, G. M. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.190116.115 · Cited by 40
FIREcaller: Detecting frequently interacting regions from Hi-C data
Crowley, C., Yang, Y., Qiu, Y., Hu, B., Abnousi, A., Lipiński, J., Plewczyński, D., Wu, D., Won, H., Ren, B., et al. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.12.026 · Cited by 37
3D hotspots of recurrent retroviral insertions reveal long-range interactions with cancer genes
Babaei, S., Akhtar, W., de Jong, J., Reinders, M., & de Ridder, J. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7381 · Cited by 37
New approaches to understanding the spatial organization of bacterial genomes
Le, T. B. K., & Laub, M. T. (2014) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2014.09.014 · Cited by 37
Budden, D., Hurley, D., Cursons, J., Markham, J. F., Davis, M. J., & Crampin, E. J. (2014) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/1756-8935-7-36 · Cited by 38
Computational Identification of Genomic Features That Influence 3D Chromatin Domain Formation
Mourad, R., & Cuvier, O. (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004908 · Cited by 38
Protein/DNA interactions in complex DNA topologies: expect the unexpected
Noy, A., Sutthibutpong, T., & Harris, S. A. (2016) · Biophysical Reviews · doi:10.1007/s12551-016-0208-8 · Cited by 37
Insight into genetic predisposition to chronic lymphocytic leukemia from integrative epigenomics
Speedy, H. E., Beekman, R., Chapaprieta, V., Orlando, G., Law, P., Martin‐García, D., Gutiérrez‐Abril, J., Catovsky, D., Beà, S., Clot, G., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11582-2 · Cited by 38
Shaping centromeres to resist mitotic spindle forces
Lawrimore, J., & Bloom, K. (2022) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.259532 · Cited by 37
Genome architecture: from linear organisation of chromatin to the 3D assembly in the nucleus
Sequeira‐Mendes, J., & Gutiérrez, C. (2015) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/s00412-015-0538-5 · Cited by 36
Functional organization and dynamics of the cell nucleus
Guo, T., & Fang, Y. (2014) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00378 · Cited by 36
Cai, M., Kim, S., Wang, K., Farnham, P., Coetzee, G. A., & Lu, W. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep22462 · Cited by 37
Robin, J. D., & Magdinier, F. (2016) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2016.00153 · Cited by 39
Compartmentalization with nuclear landmarks yields random, yet precise, genome organization
Kamat, K., Lao, Z., Qi, Y., Wang, Y., Ma, J., & Zhang, B. (2023) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2023.03.003 · Cited by 33
Unravelling the molecular basis for regulatory T‐cell plasticity and loss of function in disease
Sadlon, T. J., Brown, C. Y., Bandara, V., Hope, C. M., Schjenken, J. E., Pederson, S., Breen, J., Forrest, A. R. R., Beyer, M., Robertson, S. A., et al. (2018) · Clinical & Translational Immunology · doi:10.1002/cti2.1011 · Cited by 38
HiGlass: Web-based Visual Exploration and Analysis of Genome Interaction MapsPreprint
Kerpedjiev, P., Abdennur, N. A., Lekschas, F., McCallum, C., Dinkla, K., Strobelt, H., Luber, J. M., Ouellette, S., Azhir, A., Kumar, N., et al. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/121889 · Cited by 43
Self-citationShi, G., & Thirumalai, D. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36412-4 · Cited by 34
Analysis of Single Locus Trajectories for Extracting In Vivo Chromatin Tethering Interactions
Amitai, A., Toulouze, M., Dubrana, K., & Holcman, D. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004433 · Cited by 35
Systematic identification of protein combinations mediating chromatin looping
Zhang, K., Li, N., Ainsworth, R. I., & Wang, W. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12249 · Cited by 35
Heil, C. S., Burton, J. N., Liachko, I., Friedrich, A., Hanson, N. A., Morris, C. L., Schacherer, J., Shendure, J., Thomas, J. H., & Dunham, M. J. (2017) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.3280 · Cited by 36
DDB2 Is a Novel Regulator of Wnt Signaling in Colon Cancer
Huang, S., Fantini, D., Merrill, B. J., Bagchi, S., Guzman, G., & Raychaudhuri, P. (2017) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-1570 · Cited by 36
Computational methods for analyzing and modeling genome structure and organization
Lin, D., Bonora, G., Yardımcı, G. G., & Noble, W. S. (2018) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1435 · Cited by 37
Practical Analysis of Hi-C Data: Generating A/B Compartment Profiles.
Miura, H., Poonperm, R., Takahashi, S., & Hiratani, I. (2018) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8766-5_16 · Cited by 31
Modes of phase separation affecting chromatin regulation
Palikyras, S., & Papantonis, A. (2019) · Open Biology · doi:10.1098/rsob.190167 · Cited by 35
Selvarajan, I., Toropainen, A., Garske, K. M., Rodríguez, M. L., Ko, A., Miao, Z., Kamińska, D., Õunap, K., Örd, T., Ravindran, A., et al. (2021) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.02.006 · Cited by 34
Charting the dynamic epigenome during B-cell development
Martín-Subero, J. I., & Oakes, C. C. (2017) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.08.008 · Cited by 41
High-resolution dynamic imaging of chromatin DNA communication using Oligo-LiveFISH
Zhu, Y., Balaji, A., Han, M., Andronov, L. P., Roy, A. R., Wei, Z., Chen, C., Miles, L., Cai, S., Gu, Z., et al. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.03.032 · Cited by 38
Understanding spatial organizations of chromosomes via statistical analysis of Hi‐C data
Hu, M., Deng, K., Qin, Z. S., & Liu, J. S. (2013) · Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1007/s40484-013-0016-0 · Cited by 35
Tai, P. W. L., Wu, H., Gordon, J. A. R., Whitfield, T. W., Barutcu, A. R., van Wijnen, A. J., Lian, J. B., Stein, G. S., & Stein, J. L. (2014) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2014.05.044 · Cited by 34
Diament, A., Pinter, R. Y., & Tuller, T. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6876 · Cited by 35
DNase I hypersensitivity mapping, genomic footprinting, and transcription factor networks in plants
Sullivan, A. M., Bubb, K. L., Sandstrom, R. S., Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A., & Queitsch, C. (2015) · Current Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cpb.2015.10.001 · Cited by 40
Short‐range regulatory chromatin loops in plants
Gagliardi, D., & Manavella, P. A. (2020) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.16632 · Cited by 34
Genomic approaches for studying craniofacial disorders
Khandelwal, K. D., van Bokhoven, H., Roscioli, T., Carels, C. E. L., & Zhou, H. (2013) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.31379 · Cited by 35
Structural variants in the 3D genome as drivers of disease
Sreenivasan, V. K. A., Yumiceba, V., & Spielmann, M. (2025) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-025-00862-x · Cited by 45
Polymer models of interphase chromosomes
Vásquez, P. A., & Bloom, K. (2014) · Nucleus · doi:10.4161/nucl.36275 · Cited by 33
Role of CTCF in DNA damage response
Tanwar, V. S., Jose, C. C., & Cuddapah, S. (2018) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2018.02.002 · Cited by 34
Structural and Dynamical Signatures of Local DNA Damage in Live Cells
Eaton, J. A., & Zidovska, A. (2019) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2019.10.042 · Cited by 30
Wu, H., Wu, Y., Jiang, Y., Zhou, B., Zhou, H., Chen, Z., Xiong, Y., Liu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab396 · Cited by 34
Regulation of Tcrb Gene Assembly by Genetic, Epigenetic, and Topological Mechanisms
Majumder, K., Bassing, C. H., & Oltz, E. M. (2015) · Advances in immunology · doi:10.1016/bs.ai.2015.07.001 · Cited by 33
Multiscale Topology of Chromatin Folding
Emmett, K., Schweinhart, B., & Rabadán, R. (2016) · International Conference on Bio-Inspired Models of Network, Information and Computing Systems (BIONETICS) · doi:10.4108/eai.3-12-2015.2262453 · Cited by 36
Structural features of the fly chromatin colors revealed by automatic three-dimensional modelingPreprint
Serra, F., Baù, D., Filion, G. J. P., & Martı́-Renom, M. A. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/036764 · Cited by 33
Promoter-like epigenetic signatures in exons displaying cell type-specific splicing
Curado, J., Iannone, C., Tilgner, H., Valcárcel, J., & Guigó, R. (2015) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0797-8 · Cited by 31
Phase Separation and Correlated Motions in Motorized Genome
Jiang, Z., Qi, Y., Kamat, K. D., & Zhang, B. (2022) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c03238 · Cited by 29
Explicit ion modeling predicts physicochemical interactions for chromatin organization
Lin, X., & Zhang, B. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.90073 · Cited by 31
Structural organization of human replication timing domains
Boulos, R. E., Drillon, G., Argoul, F., Arnéodo, A., & Audit, B. (2015) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2015.04.015 · Cited by 31
Unraveling architecture of the pluripotent genome
Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2014) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2014.04.006 · Cited by 34
Siahpirani, A. F., Ay, F., & Roy, S. (2016) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0962-8 · Cited by 31
Chromatin regulation in complex brain disorders
Bastle, R. M., & Maze, I. S. (2018) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.07.004 · Cited by 30
The gut microbiota links disease to human genome evolution
Quan, Y., Zhang, K., & Zhang, H. (2023) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2023.02.006 · Cited by 35
Vicente‐García, C., Villarejo-Balcells, B., Irastorza-Azcárate, I., Naranjo, S., Acemel, R. D., Tena, J. J., Rigby, P. W. J., Devos, D. P., Gómez-Skármeta, J. L., & Carvajal, J. J. (2017) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1225-z · Cited by 30
HIPMap: A High-Throughput Imaging Method for Mapping Spatial Gene PositionsPreprint
Shachar, S., Pegoraro, G., & Misteli, T. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.2015.80.027417 · Cited by 35
Gilbert, B. R., Thornburg, Z. R., Lam, V., Rashid, F.-Z. M., Glass, J. I., Villa, E., Dame, R. T., & Luthey-Schulten, Z. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.644133 · Cited by 30
Nguyen, H. Q., Nye, J., Buster, D. W., Klebba, J. E., Rogers, G. C., & Bosco, G. (2015) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005014 · Cited by 29
The Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell Cistrome
Hewitt, K. J., Johnson, K. D., Gao, X., Keleş, S., & Bresnick, E. H. (2016) · Current topics in developmental biology/Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/bs.ctdb.2016.01.002 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Dekker, J., Marti-Renom, M. A., & Mirny, L. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dekker, Job
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Genetics
- Published
- 2013-05-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 390-403
- ISSN
- 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0064
- PMC
- PMC3874835
- OpenAlex
- W1574083126
- Cited by
- 1,068
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 107 · 2017: 122 · 2016: 122 · 2015: 121 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 30
- FWCI
- 11.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
- PMC
- Funders
- W. M. Keck Foundation
- European Commission (282510)
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (BFU2010-19310)
- National Institutes of Health (HG003143)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (HG003143, HG003143-06S1, R01HG003143)
- National Cancer Institute (U54CA143874)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Keywords
- 3D genome organization, chromatin interactions, chromosome conformation capture, Hi-C, 4Cs, 5C, nuclear organization, gene expression regulation, chromatin accessibility
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Chromatin, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Human, Epistasis, Genetic, Humans, Models, Genetic, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Genome, Human
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
