Cited by 12Gut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disordersMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Microbial metabolites feed into the gut–brain–gut circuit during host metabolism

Ray, Katrina·2014·Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ray, K.
Corresponding author
Ray, Katrina
Venue
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Published
2014-01-28
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
76-76
ISSN
  • 1759-5045 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5053
OpenAlex
W2069896646
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
gut microbiota metabolites, gut-brain axis, host metabolism, neural circuits, microbial metabolites, host-microbe interactions
MeSH terms
Animals, Gluconeogenesis, Intestinal Mucosa, Intestines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review