Cited by 835RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA modifications and cancerRNA Research and Splicing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 143 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Codon optimality, bias and usage in translation and mRNA decay

Open access
Hanson, Gavin, Coller, Jeff·2018·Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Abstract

The advent of ribosome profiling and other tools to probe mRNA translation has revealed that codon bias - the uneven use of synonymous codons in the transcriptome - serves as a secondary genetic code: a code that guides the efficiency of protein production, the fidelity of translation and the metabolism of mRNAs. Recent advancements in our understanding of mRNA decay have revealed a tight coupling between ribosome dynamics and the stability of mRNA transcripts; this coupling integrates codon bias into the concept of codon optimality, or the effects that specific codons and tRNA concentrations have on the efficiency and fidelity of the translation machinery. In this Review, we first discuss the evidence for codon-dependent effects on translation, beginning with the basic mechanisms through which translation perturbation can affect translation efficiency, protein folding and transcript stability. We then discuss how codon effects are leveraged by the cell to tailor the proteome to maintain homeostasis, execute specific gene expression programmes of growth or differentiation and optimize the efficiency of protein production.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrm.2017.91

Cites

143 of 143 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 143 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 835

Metadata

Authors
Hanson, G., & Coller, J.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hanson, Gavin
  • Coller, Jeff
Venue
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Published
2017-10-11
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
20-30
ISSN
  • 1471-0072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0080
OpenAlex
W2762868004
Cited by
825
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 92 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 122 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 46
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM118018, R01GM125086, T32GM007250)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
codon usage bias, codon optimality, synonymous codons, tRNA abundance, translation efficiency, translation fidelity, ribosome profiling, mRNA degradation, transcript stability, protein folding, ribosome dynamics, gene expression regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Codon, Homeostasis, Humans, Proteins, Ribosomes, RNA, Messenger, Protein Biosynthesis, Protein Folding, RNA Stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review