Cited by 266Visual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Attention Is Spontaneously Biased Toward Regularities

Open access
Zhao, Jiaying, Al-Aidroos, Naseem, Turk-Browne, Nicholas B.·2013·Psychological Science

Abstract

Knowledge about regularities in the environment can be used to facilitate perception, memory, and language acquisition. Given this usefulness, we hypothesized that statistically structured sources of information receive attentional priority over noisier sources, independent of their intrinsic salience or goal relevance. We report three experiments that support this hypothesis. Experiment 1 shows that regularities bias spatial attention: Visual search was facilitated at a location containing temporal regularities, even though these regularities did not predict target location, timing, or identity. Experiments 2 and 3 show that regularities bias feature attention: Attentional capture doubled in magnitude when singletons appeared, respectively, in a color or dimension with temporal regularities among task-irrelevant stimuli. Prioritization of the locations and features of regularities is not easily accounted for in the conventional dichotomy between stimulus-driven and goal-directed attention. This prioritization may in turn promote further statistical learning, helping the mind to acquire knowledge about stable aspects of the environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797612460407

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect of temporal regularities was observed although the vast majority of participants were unaware of the temporal regularities.

    “This effect was observed although the vast majority of the participants were unaware of the temporal regularities.”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Zhao, Al-Aidroos, & Turk-Browne, 2013

    The General Discussion says most participants reported no awareness and that the attentional bias remained robust among them. But the Results and discussion sections report that 25 of 75 participants across the three experiments said they noticed regularities, so “vast majority” overstates the self-reported lack of awareness; few of those who noticed could correctly identify where the regularities occurred. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Participants responded quicker when the target was at the stream location that contained temporal regularities relative to a random stream location.

    “Participants were found to respond quicker when the target happened to be at the stream location that contained temporal regularities relative to when it appeared at the location of a random stream.”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Zhao, Al-Aidroos, & Turk-Browne, 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, J., Al-Aidroos, N., & Turk-Browne, N. B.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Guelph (CA)
  • Princeton University
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2013-04-04
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
667-677
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2145638643
Cited by
266
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
12.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY021755)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attentional bias, statistical learning, temporal regularity, spatial attention, feature attention, visual search, attentional capture, singleton detection, bottom-up attention, top-down attention
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Space Perception, Students, Visual Perception, Bias, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review