Cited by 1,127Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsInflammasome and immune disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 121 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microglial priming in neurodegenerative disease

Perry, V. Hugh, Holmes, Clive·2014·Nature Reviews Neurology

Abstract

Under physiological conditions, the number and function of microglia--the resident macrophages of the CNS--is tightly controlled by the local microenvironment. In response to neurodegeneration and the accumulation of abnormally folded proteins, however, microglia multiply and adopt an activated state--a process referred to as priming. Studies using preclinical animal models have shown that priming of microglia is driven by changes in their microenvironment and the release of molecules that drive their proliferation. Priming makes the microglia susceptible to a secondary inflammatory stimulus, which can then trigger an exaggerated inflammatory response. The secondary stimulus can arise within the CNS, but in elderly individuals, the secondary stimulus most commonly arises from a systemic disease with an inflammatory component. The concept of microglial priming, and the subsequent exaggerated response of these cells to secondary systemic inflammation, opens the way to treat neurodegenerative diseases by targeting systemic disease or interrupting the signalling pathways that mediate the CNS response to systemic inflammation. Both lifestyle changes and pharmacological therapies could, therefore, provide efficient means to slow down or halt neurodegeneration.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.38

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 121 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,127

Metadata

Authors
Perry, V. H., & Holmes, C.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Perry, V. Hugh
Venue
Nature Reviews Neurology
Published
2014-03-18
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
217-224
ISSN
  • 1759-4758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4766
OpenAlex
W2059996790
Cited by
1,127
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 106 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 119 · 2017: 106 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 18
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Inflammasome and immune disorders
Keywords
microglial priming, neurodegeneration, microglial activation, secondary inflammation, systemic inflammation, diabetes mellitus, microglial proliferation, neuroinflammation, neurodegenerative disease treatment, lifestyle intervention
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Brain, Central Nervous System Diseases, Humans, Inflammation, Macrophage Activation, Microglia, Neurodegenerative Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review