The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Satiation on Brain Activity in Obese and Lean Women
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the response of the brains of women to the ingestion of a meal. Research Methods and Procedures: We used measures of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), a marker of neuronal activity, by positron emission tomography to describe the functional anatomy of satiation, i.e., the response to a liquid meal in the context of extreme hunger (36‐hour fast) in 10 lean (BMI ≤ 25 kg/m 2; 32 ± 10 years old, 61 ± 7 kg; mean ± SD) and 12 obese (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m 2; 30 ± 7 years old, 110 ± 14 kg) women. Results: In lean and obese women, satiation produced significant increases in rCBF in the vicinity of the prefrontal cortex (p < 0.005). Satiation also produced significant decreases in rCBF in several regions including the thalamus, insular cortex, parahippocampal gyrus, temporal cortex, and cerebellum (in lean and obese women), and hypothalamus, cingulate, nucleus accumbens, and amygdala (in obese women only; all p < 0.005). Compared with lean women, obese women had significantly greater increases in rCBF in the ventral prefrontal cortex and had significantly greater decreases in the paralimbic areas and in areas of the frontal and temporal cortex. Discussion: This study indicates that satiation elicits differential brain responses in obese and lean women. It also lends additional support to the hypothesis that the paralimbic areas participate in a central orexigenic network modulated by the prefrontal cortex through feedback loops.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space
Collins, D. L., Neelin, P., Peters, T. M., & Evans, A. C. (1994) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-199403000-00005 · Cited by 3,431
Cited by
Rothemund, Y., Preuschhof, C., Bohner, G., Bauknecht, H.-C., Klingebiel, R., Flor, H., & Klapp, B. F. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.008 · Cited by 679
Cortical and limbic activation during viewing of high- versus low-calorie foods
Killgore, W. D. S., Young, A. D., Femia, L. A., Bogorodzki, P., Rogowska, J., & Yurgelun-Todd, D. A. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00191-5 · Cited by 586
Brain abnormalities in human obesity: A voxel-based morphometric study
Pannacciulli, N., Del Parigi, A., Chen, K., Le, D. S. N. T., Reiman, E. M., & Tataranni, P. A. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.047 · Cited by 523
Self-citationSleep duration and cardiometabolic risk: A review of the epidemiologic evidence
Knutson, K. L. (2010) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.beem.2010.07.001 · Cited by 520
PYY modulation of cortical and hypothalamic brain areas predicts feeding behaviour in humans
Batterham, R. L., ffytche, D. H., Rosenthal, J. M., Zelaya, F. O., Barker, G. J., Withers, D. J., & Williams, S. C. R. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06212 · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Gautier, J., Del Parigi, A., Chen, K., Salbe, A. D., Bandy, D., Pratley, R. E., Ravussin, E., Reiman, E. M., & Tataranni, P. A.
- Venue
- Obesity Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 676-684
- ISSN
- 1071-7323 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-8528
- OpenAlex
- W2016490765
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.