The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parental Feeding Style and the Inter‐generational Transmission of Obesity Risk
Open accessAbstract
Objective: This study was designed to determine whether a community sample of obese mothers with young children used different feeding styles compared with a matched sample of normal‐weight mothers. Four aspects of feeding style were assessed: emotional feeding, instrumental feeding (using food as a reward), prompting/encouragement to eat, and control over eating. Research Methods and Procedures: Participants were from 214 families with same‐sex twins; 100 families in which both parents were overweight or obese and 114 in which both parents were normal weight or lean. Results: We found that obese mothers were no more likely than normal‐weight mothers to offer food to deal with emotional distress, use food as a form of reward, or encourage the child to eat more than was wanted. The obese and normal‐weight mothers did differ on “control”; obese mothers reported significantly less control over their children's intake, and this was seen for both first‐born and second‐born twins. Twin analyses showed that these differences were not in response to children's genetic propensities, because monozygotic correlations were no greater than dizygotic correlations for maternal feeding style. Discussion: These results suggest that the stereotype of the obese mother, who uses food in nonnutritive ways so that her child also becomes obese, is more likely to be myth than fact. However, the results raise the possibility that lack of control of food intake might contribute to the emergence of differences in weight.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genetic and Environmental Factors in Relative Body Weight and Human Adiposity
Maes, H. H. M., Neale, M. C., & Eaves, L. J. (1997) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1023/a:1025635913927 · Cited by 1,515
Wardle, J. (1987) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(87)90072-9 · Cited by 324 · cited 1×
“The full version of this questionnaire has good reliability and validity (31).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Assessment of Child and Adolescent Overweight and Obesity
Krebs, N. F., Himes, J. H., Jacobson, D., Nicklas, T. A., Guilday, P., & Styne, D. (2007) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2329d · Cited by 981
Parent‐Child Feeding Strategies and Their Relationships to Child Eating and Weight Status
Faith, M. S., Scanlon, K. S., Birch, L. L., Francis, L. A., & Sherry, B. (2004) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1038/oby.2004.212 · Cited by 911
Fundamental constructs in food parenting practices: a content map to guide future research
Vaughn, A. E., Ward, D. S., Fisher, J. O., Faith, M. S., Hughes, S. O., Kremers, S. P. J., Musher-Eizenman, D. R., O’Connor, T. M., Patrick, H., & Power, T. G. (2016) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuv061 · Cited by 649
Shloim, N., Edelson, L. R., Martin, N., & Hetherington, M. M. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01849 · Cited by 599
The Role of Parents in Preventing Childhood Obesity
Lindsay, A. C., Sussner, K. M., Kim, J., & Gortmaker, S. L. (2006) · The Future of Children · doi:10.1353/foc.2006.0006 · Cited by 566
Metadata
- Authors
- Wardle, J., Sanderson, S., Guthrie, C. A., Rapoport, L., & Plomin, R.
- Venue
- Obesity Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 453-462
- ISSN
- 1071-7323 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-8528
- OpenAlex
- W2111199156
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.