Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 402

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trends in Pre‐pregnancy Obesity in Nine States, 1993–2003

Open access
Kim, Shin Y., Dietz, Patricia M., England, Lucinda, Morrow, Brian, Callaghan, William M.·2007·Obesity

Abstract

Objective: Pre‐pregnancy obesity poses risks to both pregnant women and their infants. This study used a large population‐based data source to examine trends, from 1993 through 2003, in the prevalence of pre‐pregnancy obesity among women who delivered live infants. Research Methods and Procedures: Data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in nine states were analyzed for trends in pre‐pregnancy obesity (BMI > 29.0 kg/m 2) overall and by maternal demographic and behavioral characteristics. Pre‐pregnancy BMI was calculated from self‐reported weight and height on questionnaires administered after delivery, and demographic characteristics were taken from linked birth certificates. The sample of 66,221 births was weighted to adjust for survey design, non‐coverage, and non‐response, and it is representative of all women delivering a live birth in each particular state. The sampled births represented 18.5% of all births in the United States. Results: Pre‐pregnancy obesity increased 69.3% during the study period, from 13.0% in 1993 to 1994 to 22.0% in 2002 to 2003. The percentage increase ranged from 45% to 105% for individual states. Subgroups of women with the highest prevalence of obesity in 2002 to 2003 were those who were 20 to 29 years of age, black, had three or more children, had a high school education, enrolled in Women, Infants, and Children, or were non‐smokers. However, all subgroups of women examined experienced at least a 43% increase in pre‐pregnancy obesity over this time period. Discussion: The prevalence of pre‐pregnancy obesity is increasing among women in these nine states, and this trend has important implications for all stages of reproductive health care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2007.621

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 402

Metadata

Authors
Kim, S. Y., Dietz, P. M., England, L., Morrow, B., & Callaghan, W. M.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
986-993
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2045848891
Cited by
402
References
1
FWCI
23.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in Pre‐pregnancy Obesity in Nine States, 1993–2003. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/oby.2007.621
The paper
Kim, S. Y., Dietz, P. M., England, L., Morrow, B., & Callaghan, W. M. (2007). Trends in Pre‐pregnancy Obesity in Nine States, 1993–2003. Obesity. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2007.621

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.