Cited by 395Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementBirth, Development, and HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study: associations with maternal body mass index

Open access
HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group·2010·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Please cite this paper as: HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study: associations with maternal body mass index. BJOG 2010;117:575–584. Objective To determine whether higher maternal body mass index (BMI), independent of maternal glycaemia, is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Design Observational cohort study. Setting Fifteen centres in nine countries. Population Eligible pregnant women. Methods A 75‐g 2‐hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation in all participants. Maternal BMI was calculated from height and weight measured at the OGTT. Fetal adiposity was assessed using skinfold measurements and percentage of body fat was calculated. Associations between maternal BMI and pregnancy outcomes were assessed using multiple logistic regression analyses, with adjustment for potential confounders. Main outcome measures Predefined primary outcomes were birthweight >90th percentile, primary caesarean section, clinical neonatal hypoglycaemia and cord serum C‐peptide >90th percentile. Secondary outcomes included pre‐eclampsia, preterm delivery (before 37 weeks) and percentage of body fat >90th percentile. Results Among 23 316 blinded participants, with control for maternal glycaemia and other potential confounders, higher maternal BMI was associated (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] for highest {≥42.0 kg/m 2} versus lowest {<22.6 kg/m 2} BMI categories) with increased frequency of birthweight >90th percentile (3.52 [2.48–5.00]) and percentage of body fat >90th percentile (3.28 [2.28–4.71]), caesarean section (2.23 [1.66–2.99]), cord C‐peptide >90th percentile (2.33 [1.58–3.43]) and pre‐eclampsia (14.14 [9.44–21.17]). Preterm delivery was less frequent with higher BMI (0.48 [0.31–0.74]). Associations with fetal size tended to plateau in the highest maternal BMI categories. Conclusion Higher maternal BMI, independent of maternal glycaemia, is strongly associated with increased frequency of pregnancy complications, in particular those related to excess fetal growth and adiposity and to pre‐eclampsia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02486.x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 5 CEMACH. Why mothers die. The Sixth Report into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom . London: RCOG Press, 2004.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group
Corresponding author
HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03-08
Volume
117
Issue
5
Pages
575-584
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W204391295
Cited by
395
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 47
FWCI
50.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000080, M01 RR00048, M01RR00080, M01RR000048)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01-HD-34243, R01-HD-34242, R01HD034242, R01HD034243)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
maternal body mass index, maternal obesity, adverse pregnancy outcomes, fetal growth, birth weight, fetal adiposity, preeclampsia, cesarean section, preterm birth, neonatal hypoglycemia, HAPO study
MeSH terms
Adult, Cesarean Section, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Obesity, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Diagnosis, Body Mass Index, Adiposity, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review