Cited by 148Geochemistry and Elemental AnalysisGeological and Geophysical StudiesPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

New Deeps with Brines and Metalliferous Sediments in the Red Sea

BACKER, H., SCHOELL, M.·1972·Nature Physical Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/physci240153a0

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only two brine pools are classified as type I: the Oceanographer deep and the Kebrit deep.

    “In contrast, only two brine pools are classified as type I: the Oceanographer deep (26°17.2′N, 35°01.0′E)37 and the Kebrit deep (24°43.1′N, 36°17′E)38.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BACKER, H., & SCHOELL, M.
Venue
Nature Physical Science
Published
1972-12
Volume
240
Issue
103
Pages
153-158
ISSN
  • 0300-8746 (ISSN-L)
  • 2058-1106
OpenAlex
W2068725424
Cited by
148
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
17.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature Physical Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
brine pools, hydrothermal sediments, metalliferous sediments, brine chemistry, hydrothermal activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review