Cited by 97Body Composition Measurement TechniquesObesity, Physical Activity, DietDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Defining cutoffs to diagnose obesity using the relative fat mass (RFM): Association with mortality in NHANES 1999–2014

Woolcott, Orison O., Bergman, Richard N.·2020·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

Background/objectives We have recently proposed and validated a simple and accurate method to estimate whole-body fat percentage in adults, the relative fat mass (RFM), derived from the ratio of height to waist circumference. We aimed to identify RFM cutoffs to diagnose obesity based on the association between RFM and all-cause mortality.Subjects/methods We used data from adult participants (≥20 years of age, n = 43,793) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2014 linked with death certificate records from the National Death Index. Optimal RFM cutoffs were determined using receiver-operating characteristic analysis (the Youden's index and the Euclidean minimum distance to the coordinate (0,1)).Results Final dataset for analyses comprised 31,008 adults. During a median follow-up of 8.3 years (IQR, 7.6-13.7), 2,517 deaths occurred. Youden and Euclidean optimal cutoffs of baseline RFM for all-cause mortality were 40.8% and 41.6% for women, and 30.9% and 28.9% for men, respectively. Similar cutoffs were obtained using measured whole-body fat percentage by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Adjusting for age, BMI category, ethnicity, education level, and smoking status, the hazard ratio for mortality using Cox proportional hazard regression was 1.41 (95% CI, 1.02-1.95) among women who had an RFM of 40.0-44.9% compared with women who had an RFM <35% (P = 0.035). Among men, the hazard ratio was 1.57 (95% CI, 1.07-2.30) among those with an RFM of 30.0-34.9% compared with men who had an RFM <25% (P = 0.020). Similar adjusted hazard ratios for same RFM categories were obtained in our validation population (NHANES III, n = 12,650, median follow-up: 23.3 years): 1.42 (95% CI, 1.01-2.00) among women (P = 0.043) and 1.50 (95% CI, 1.07-2.10) among men (P = 0.021).Conclusions We suggest rounded RFM cutoffs of 40% for women and 30% for men to diagnose obesity and identify individuals at higher risk of death.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41366-019-0516-8

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The upper sex-specific cut-offs of 40% for female and 30% for male have been proposed as best predictors of mortality in the NHANES sample (American population) using DXA.

    “Regarding body FM, the upper sex-speci fi c cut-offs of 40% for female and 30% for male have been proposed as best predictors of mortality in the NHANES sample (American population) using DXA [59].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lobman TG, Houtkooper L, Going SB. Body fat measurement goes high-tech: not all are created equal. ACSM's Health Fit J. 1997;1:30–35.
  2. AACE/ACE Obesity Task Force. AACE/ACE position statement on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of obesity. Endocr Pract. 1998;4:297–350.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woolcott, O. O., & Bergman, R. N.
Affiliations
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Woolcott, Orison O.
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2020-01-07
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1301-1310
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W2999749765
Cited by
97
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R37DK027619, R01DK027619)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
relative fat mass, obesity diagnosis, cut-off values, all-cause mortality, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, sex differences, NHANES, body composition, mortality prediction, body mass index limitations, National Death Index, NHANES III
MeSH terms
Adult, Anthropometry, Body Height, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Nutrition Surveys, Obesity, ROC Curve, United States, Absorptiometry, Photon, Adiposity, Waist Circumference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review