Cited by 161Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research

MYC dysregulation in the progression of multiple myeloma

Open access
MMRF CoMMpass Network, Misund, Kristine, Keane, Niamh, Stein, Caleb K., Asmann, Yan W., Day, Grady, Welsh, Seth, Van Wier, Scott A. +17 more·2020·Leukemia

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41375-019-0543-4

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RAS mutations, MYC translocations, APOBEC mutagenesis, and patterns of genomic complexity are the most commonly reported alterations in progressing multiple myeloma.

    “Among these, RAS mutations, MYC translocations, APOBEC mutagenesis, and patterns of genomic complexity are the most commonly reported.8,9,11,69,76-83,84”

    From Evolution of Multiple Myeloma from a Genomic Perspective (2026) · cites this paper as [81]

    In the main text (page unavailable), the paper identifies MYC structural variants and RAS-pathway mutations as progression-related events and reports their frequencies in SMM and MM. It does not address APOBEC mutagenesis or establish that the four listed categories are the most commonly reported alterations; its discussion of complexity concerns some MYC rearrangements, not genomic complexity generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MMRF CoMMpass Network, Misund, K., Keane, N., Stein, C. K., Asmann, Y. W., Day, G., Welsh, S., Van Wier, S. A., Riggs, D. L., Ahmann, G., Chesi, M., Viswanatha, D. S., Kumar, S. K., Dispenzieri, A., Gonzalez-Calle, V., Kyle, R. A., O’Dwyer, M., Rajkumar, S. V., Kortüm, K. M., Keats, J. J., Fonseca, R., Stewart, A. K., Kuehl, W. M., Braggio, E., & Bergsagel, P. L.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Translational Genomics Research Institute (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Bergsagel, P. Leif
Venue
Leukemia
Published
2019-08-22
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
322-326
ISSN
  • 0887-6924 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5551
OpenAlex
W2969224998
Cited by
161
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 2
FWCI
15.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Leukemia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (U54CA224018, R01CA195688, R01CA168762, P50CA186781)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Keywords
multiple myeloma, disease progression, carcinogenesis, FOXM1, glycolysis, energy metabolism, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, drug resistance, genetic heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Humans, Multiple Myeloma, Mutation, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review