Cited by 146AI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Quality control stress test for deep learning-based diagnostic model in digital pathology

Open access
Schömig-Markiefka, Birgid, Pryalukhin, Alexey, Hulla, Wolfgang, Bychkov, Andrey, Fukuoka, Junya, Madabhushi, Anant, Achter, Viktor, Nieroda, Lech +3 more·2021·Modern Pathology

Abstract

Digital pathology provides a possibility for computational analysis of histological slides and automatization of routine pathological tasks. Histological slides are very heterogeneous concerning staining, sections' thickness, and artifacts arising during tissue processing, cutting, staining, and digitization. In this study, we digitally reproduce major types of artifacts. Using six datasets from four different institutions digitized by different scanner systems, we systematically explore artifacts' influence on the accuracy of the pre-trained, validated, deep learning-based model for prostate cancer detection in histological slides. We provide evidence that any histological artifact dependent on severity can lead to a substantial loss in model performance. Strategies for the prevention of diagnostic model accuracy losses in the context of artifacts are warranted. Stress-testing of diagnostic models using synthetically generated artifacts might be an essential step during clinical validation of deep learning-based algorithms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41379-021-00859-x

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schömig-Markiefka, B., Pryalukhin, A., Hulla, W., Bychkov, A., Fukuoka, J., Madabhushi, A., Achter, V., Nieroda, L., Büttner, R., Quaas, A., & Tolkach, Y.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Wiener Neustadt (AT)
  • Kameda Medical Center (JP)
  • Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
Tolkach, Yuri
Venue
Modern Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
34
Issue
12
Pages
2098-2108
ISSN
0893-3952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3176446229
Cited by
146
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
8.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Modern Pathology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 BX004121)
  • National Institutes of Health (5u54ca254566-04, UL1TR002548)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL151277)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA248226, U54CA254566, U24CA199374, R01CA216579, U01CA239055, R01CA208236, R01CA202752, R01CA220581, R01CA249992)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R43EB028736)
  • National Center for Research Resources (C06RR012463)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
digital pathology, histological artifacts, stress testing, prostate cancer detection, clinical validation of AI
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Pathology, Clinical, Prostatic Neoplasms, Quality Control, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review