Cited by 130Psychedelics and Drug StudiesForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisAlkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology

Comparative acute effects of mescaline, lysergic acid diethylamide, and psilocybin in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study in healthy participants

Open access
Ley, Laura, Holze, Friederike, Arikci, Denis, Becker, Anna M., Straumann, Isabelle, Klaiber, Aaron, Coviello, Fabio, Dierbach, Sophie +6 more·2023·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Mescaline, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and psilocybin are classic serotonergic psychedelics. A valid, direct comparison of the effects of these substances is lacking. The main goal of the present study was to investigate potential pharmacological, physiological and phenomenological differences at psychoactive-equivalent doses of mescaline, LSD, and psilocybin. The present study used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over design to compare the acute subjective effects, autonomic effects, and pharmacokinetics of typically used, moderate to high doses of mescaline (300 and 500 mg), LSD (100 µg), and psilocybin (20 mg) in 32 healthy participants. A mescaline dose of 300 mg was used in the first 16 participants and 500 mg was used in the subsequent 16 participants. Acute subjective effects of 500 mg mescaline, LSD, and psilocybin were comparable across various psychometric scales. Autonomic effects of 500 mg mescaline, LSD, and psilocybin were moderate, with psilocybin causing a higher increase in diastolic blood pressure compared with LSD, and LSD showing a trend toward an increase in heart rate compared with psilocybin. The tolerability of mescaline, LSD, and psilocybin was comparable, with mescaline at both doses inducing slightly more subacute adverse effects (12-24 h) than LSD and psilocybin. Clear distinctions were seen in the duration of action between the three substances. Mescaline had the longest effect duration (mean: 11.1 h), followed by LSD (mean: 8.2 h), and psilocybin (mean: 4.9 h). Plasma elimination half-lives of mescaline and LSD were similar (approximately 3.5 h). The longer effect duration of mescaline compared with LSD was due to the longer time to reach maximal plasma concentrations and related peak effects. Mescaline and LSD, but not psilocybin, enhanced circulating oxytocin. None of the substances altered plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentrations. In conclusion, the present study found no evidence of qualitative differences in altered states of consciousness that were induced by equally strong doses of mescaline, LSD, and psilocybin. The results indicate that any differences in the pharmacological profiles of mescaline, LSD, and psilocybin do not translate into relevant differences in the subjective experience. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04227756.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41386-023-01607-2

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared to other psychedelics such as psilocybin or LSD, the overall experience duration of combined DMT/HAR with this specific administration protocol (3-4 h) is shorter.

    “Compared to other psychedelics such as psilocybin (Holze: 5.6 ± 2.2, 6.5 ± 2.4; Ley: 4.9 ± 1.7; Passie 3–6 h) or LSD (Holze: 9.3 ± 3.2, 11 ± 3.7; Ley: 8.2 ± 3.1; Passie: 9–12 h) (39, 76–78), the overall experience duration of combined DMT/HAR with this specific administration protocol (3–4 h) is shorter.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ley, L., Holze, F., Arikci, D., Becker, A. M., Straumann, I., Klaiber, A., Coviello, F., Dierbach, S., Thomann, J., Duthaler, U., Luethi, D., Varghese, N., Eckert, A., & Liechti, M. E.
Affiliations
University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Liechti, Matthias E.
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2023-05-25
Volume
48
Issue
11
Pages
1659-1667
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W4378174725
Cited by
130
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 7
FWCI
37.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (32003B_185111)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
Keywords
mescaline, lysergic acid diethylamide, psilocybin, psychedelics, autonomic effects, blood pressure, heart rate, pharmacokinetics, plasma half-life, tolerability, adverse effects, oxytocin, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, altered states of consciousness, serotonergic psychedelics, dose comparison
MeSH terms
Hallucinogens, Humans, Lysergic Acid Diethylamide, Mescaline, Psilocybin, Cross-Over Studies, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review