Cited by 247Psychedelics and Drug StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

Distinct acute effects of LSD, MDMA, and d-amphetamine in healthy subjects

Open access
Holze, Friederike, Vizeli, Patrick, Müller, Felix, Ley, Laura, Duerig, Raoul, Varghese, Nimmy, Eckert, Anne, Borgwardt, Stefan +1 more·2020·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) is a classic psychedelic, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is an empathogen, and D-amphetamine is a classic stimulant. All three substances are used recreationally. LSD and MDMA are being investigated as medications to assist psychotherapy, and D-amphetamine is used for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. All three substances induce distinct acute subjective effects. However, differences in acute responses to these prototypical psychoactive substances have not been characterized in a controlled study. We investigated the acute autonomic, subjective, and endocrine effects of single doses of LSD (0.1 mg), MDMA (125 mg), D-amphetamine (40 mg), and placebo in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study in 28 healthy subjects. All of the substances produced comparable increases in hemodynamic effects, body temperature, and pupil size, indicating equivalent autonomic responses at the doses used. LSD and MDMA increased heart rate more than D-amphetamine, and D-amphetamine increased blood pressure more than LSD and MDMA. LSD induced significantly higher ratings on the 5 Dimensions of Altered States of Consciousness scale and Mystical Experience Questionnaire than MDMA and D-amphetamine. LSD also produced greater subjective drug effects, ego dissolution, introversion, emotional excitation, anxiety, and inactivity than MDMA and D-amphetamine. LSD also induced greater impairments in subjective ratings of concentration, sense of time, and speed of thinking compared with MDMA and D-amphetamine. MDMA produced greater ratings of good drug effects, liking, high, and ego dissolution compared with D-amphetamine. D-Amphetamine increased ratings of activity and concentration compared with LSD. MDMA but not LSD or D-amphetamine increased plasma concentrations of oxytocin. None of the substances altered plasma concentrations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. These results indicate clearly distinct acute effects of LSD, MDMA, and D-amphetamine and may assist the dose-finding in substance-assisted psychotherapy research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41386-019-0569-3

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MDMA does not produce mystical-type experiences as measured using a variety of scales related to altered states of consciousness.

    “it does not produce mystical-type experiences as measured using a variety of scales related to altered states of consciousness”

    From Psychedelics and Other Psychoplastogens for Treating Mental Illness. (2021) · cites this paper as [241]

    The Discussion reports that MDMA produced only minimal alterations of consciousness compared with LSD, supporting the claim’s general contrast. But the Results report significant increases in positive mood and ineffability on the Mystical Experience Questionnaires and in blissful state on the 5D-ASC. The categorical statement that MDMA does not produce mystical-type experiences overstates these findings. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MDMA's ability to enhance social bonding is thought to be driven by its stimulation of oxytocin release, which increases prosocial feelings, greater trust in interpersonal interactions, and openness to social reward and connectedness.

    “MDMA’s ability to enhance social bonding is thought to be driven by its stimulation of oxytocin release (84), which increases prosocial feelings (85), greater trust in interpersonal interactions (86), and openness to social reward and connectedness (87).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holze, F., Vizeli, P., Müller, F., Ley, L., Duerig, R., Varghese, N., Eckert, A., Borgwardt, S., & Liechti, M. E.
Affiliations
University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Liechti, Matthias E.
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2019-11-16
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
462-471
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2983486486
Cited by
247
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 20
FWCI
28.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (320030_170249)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
lysergic acid diethylamide, MDMA, d-amphetamine, psychedelics, stimulants, autonomic responses, heart rate, blood pressure, pupil size, body temperature, altered states of consciousness, mystical experience, ego dissolution, concentration difficulties, oxytocin, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, dose-finding
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Consciousness, Dextroamphetamine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Hallucinogens, Humans, Lysergic Acid Diethylamide, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Cross-Over Studies, N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review