Cited by 121Health, Environment, Cognitive AgingChild and Adolescent HealthBirth, Development, and Health

The NIH ECHO program: investigating how early environmental influences affect child health

Open access
Blaisdell, Carol J., Park, Christina, Hanspal, Manjit, Roary, Mary, Arteaga, S. Sonia, Laessig, Susan, Luetkemeier, Erin, Gillman, Matthew W. +1 more·2022·Pediatric Research

Abstract

The ECHO Program has two major components, pediatric cohorts — focusing on observational research — and the IDeA States Pediatric Clinical Trials Network (ISPCTN) — focusing on interven-tional research. The program ’ s mission is to enhance the health of children for generations to come. ECHO ’ s goals are to (1) enable high-impact research evidence that will inform clinical practices, policies, and programs for child health and development; and (2) establish a national data platform and biorepository for the scienti fi c community. This article discusses the observational research component of ECHO and introduces a series of three reviews 1 – 3 appearing in this issue or forthcoming, each covering a different aspect of the ECHO Program. ECHO supports multiple synergistic, longitudinal studies to investigate how environmental exposures in early life — including physical, chemical, social, behavioral, biological, natural, and built environments — affect child health and development. ECHO science focuses on fi ve key pediatric outcomes that have a high public health impact: (1) pre-, peri-, and postnatal outcomes; (2) upper and lower airway conditions; (3) obesity; (4) neurodevelop-ment; and (5) positive health. ECHO uses a collaborative team science approach to children ’ s health research. 1 NIH designed the ECHO pediatric cohorts by leveraging existing longitudinal birth cohorts, and supporting expansion of recruit-ment and continued follow-up of pregnant women and

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41390-021-01574-8

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blaisdell, C. J., Park, C., Hanspal, M., Roary, M., Arteaga, S. S., Laessig, S., Luetkemeier, E., Gillman, M. W., & Outcomes, O. B. O. P. C. F. E. I. O. C. H.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Blaisdell, Carol J.
Venue
Pediatric Research
Published
2021-06-15
Volume
92
Issue
5
Pages
1215-1216
ISSN
  • 0031-3998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0447
OpenAlex
W3170640175
Cited by
121
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  • Duke Clinical Research Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
ECHO program, pediatric cohort, observational studies, intervention research, child health and development, biorepository
MeSH terms
Child Health, Child, Environmental Exposure, Environmental Health, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review