Cited by 12Hemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesCongenital Heart Disease Studies

Cerebral blood flow dynamics during cardiac surgery in infants

Open access
Leth-Olsen, Martin, Døhlen, Gaute, Torp, Hans, Nyrnes, Siri Ann·2025·Pediatric Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this pilot study, we investigated continuous cerebral blood flow velocity measurements to explore cerebrovascular hemodynamics in infants with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: A non-invasive transfontanellar cerebral Doppler monitor (NeoDoppler) was used to monitor 15 infants (aged eight days to nine months) during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Numerical and visual analyses were conducted to assess trends and events in Doppler measurements together with standard monitoring equipment. The mean flow index, calculated as the moving Pearson correlation between mean arterial pressure and time averaged velocity, was utilized to evaluate dynamic autoregulation. Two levels of impaired autoregulation were defined (Mean flow index >0.3/0.45), and percentage of time above these limits were calculated. RESULTS: High quality recordings were achieved during 90.6% of the monitoring period. There was a significant reduction in time averaged velocity in all periods of cardiopulmonary bypass. All patients showed a high percentage of time with impaired dynamic autoregulation, with Mean flow index >0.3 and 0.45: 73.71% ± 9.06% and 65.16% ± 11.27% respectively. Additionally, the system promptly detected hemodynamic events. CONCLUSION: Continuous transfontanellar cerebral Doppler monitoring could become an additional tool in enhancing cerebral monitoring in infants during cardiac surgery. IMPACT: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of continuous transfontanellar Doppler monitoring of cerebral blood flow velocities during cardiac surgery in infants. It also demonstrates a high proportion of time with impaired cerebral autoregulation during cardiac surgery based on the Mean flow index. Continuous transfontanellar Doppler could become a useful tool to improve cerebral monitoring and provide new pathophysiological insight.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41390-024-03161-z

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinicians can assess cerebral autoregulatory function in relation to systemic blood pressure by measurement of cerebral blood flow velocities along with mean arterial pressure and near-infrared spectroscopy.

    “Clinicians can assess cerebral autoregulatory function in relation to systemic blood pressure by measurement of cerebral blood flow velocities (CBFVs) along with mean arterial pressure and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) [62].”

    From Trends and Challenges in Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Neonates Following Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review (2025) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Introduction says autoregulation can be described using mean arterial pressure with either Doppler-measured cerebral blood flow velocity or NIRS. The claim instead presents all three measurements as a combined approach; the Discussion also distinguishes this study’s Doppler-based assessment from studies using MAP and NIRS. Our copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • More recently, the same group demonstrated that NeoDoppler could continuously track CBFV fluctuations throughout cardiopulmonary bypass in infants undergoing various cardiac surgical procedures, and that it could detect hemodynamic changes more rapidly than NIRS.

    “More recently, the same group demonstrated that NeoDoppler could continuously track CBFV fluctuations throughout cardiopulmonary bypass in infants undergoing various cardiac surgical procedures, and that it could detect hemodynamic changes more rapidly than NIRS [62].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leth-Olsen, M., Døhlen, G., Torp, H., & Nyrnes, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Leth-Olsen, Martin
Venue
Pediatric Research
Published
2024-04-03
Volume
97
Issue
2
Pages
625-633
ISSN
  • 0031-3998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0447
OpenAlex
W4393898768
Cited by
12
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Norges Forskningsråd (260699/O30)
  • St. Olavs Hospital Universitetssykehuset i Trondheim
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Keywords
cerebral blood flow velocity, cerebral autoregulation, infants, congenital heart disease, cardiac surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, cerebral hemodynamics, hemodynamic monitoring
MeSH terms
Blood Flow Velocity, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Female, Heart Defects, Congenital, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Hemodynamics, Homeostasis, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Pilot Projects, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review