The DOI matches its Crossref record; 137 of the 139 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning in mental health outcome research: a scoping review
Open accessAbstract
Mental illnesses, such as depression, are highly prevalent and have been shown to impact an individual’s physical health. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been introduced to assist mental health providers, including psychiatrists and psychologists, for decision-making based on patients’ historical data (e.g., medical records, behavioral data, social media usage, etc.). Deep learning (DL), as one of the most recent generation of AI technologies, has demonstrated superior performance in many real-world applications ranging from computer vision to healthcare. The goal of this study is to review existing research on applications of DL algorithms in mental health outcome research. Specifically, we first briefly overview the state-of-the-art DL techniques. Then we review the literature relevant to DL applications in mental health outcomes. According to the application scenarios, we categorize these relevant articles into four groups: diagnosis and prognosis based on clinical data, analysis of genetics and genomics data for understanding mental health conditions, vocal and visual expression data analysis for disease detection, and estimation of risk of mental illness using social media data. Finally, we discuss challenges in using DL algorithms to improve our understanding of mental health conditions and suggest several promising directions for their applications in improving mental health diagnosis and treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures




Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This “black box” nature of some ML models raises concerns about their transparency and accountability, particularly in the context of public health interventions that can have far-reaching consequences [55, 56].”
From Integrating machine learning and artificial intelligence in life-course epidemiology: pathways to innovative public health solutions (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892 · cited 1×
“2a, there is a weight parameter associated with each edge in the DFNN, which needs to be optimized by minimizing some training loss measured on a speci fi c training dataset (usually through back-propagation 17 ).”
MethodThe Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks
Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.02907 · Cited by 24,853
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Biship, C. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007).
- McGuffin, P., Owen, M. J. & Gottesman, I. I. Psychiatric Genetics and Genomics (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2004).
- Yue, T. & Wang, H. Deep learning for genomics: a concise overview. Preprint at arXiv:1802.00810 (2018). · arXiv
- Salakhutdinov, R. & Hinton, G. Deep Boltzmann machines. In Proc. 12th Int. Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics 448–455 (Clearwater, Florida, USA, 2009).
- Sadeque, F., Xu, D. & Bethard, S. UArizona at the CLEF eRisk 2017 pilot task: linear and recurrent models for early depression detection. CEUR Workshop Proc. 1866 (2017).
- Yosinski, J., Clune, J., Bengio, Y. & Lipson, H. How transferable are features in deep neural networks? In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 3320–3328 (Montreal, Canada, 2014).
- Srivastava, N., Mansimov, E. & Salakhudinov, R. Unsupervised learning of video representations using LSTMs. In Proc. Int. Conference on Machine Learning 843–852 (Lille, France, 2015).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prefrontal cortex and depression
Pizzagalli, D. A., & Roberts, A. C. (2022) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01101-7 · Cited by 667
“Finally, we believe embracing a computational psychiatry approach – including the use of deep learning and artificial neural network to diagnose MDD [266, 267] and predict treatment response [268] – offers unprecedented opportunities, particularly when coupled with improved experimental design to isolate precise psych…”
BackgroundNatural language processing applied to mental illness detection: a narrative review
Zhang, T., Schoene, A. M., Ji, S., & Ananiadou, S. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00589-7 · Cited by 476
“For the task of mental illness detection from text, deep learning techniques have recently attracted more attention and shown better performance compared to machine learning ones 116 .”
MethodFrom promise to practice: towards the realisation of AI-informed mental health care
Koutsouleris, N., Hauser, T. U., Skvortsova, V., & De Choudhury, M. (2022) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00153-4 · Cited by 251
Machine learning model to predict mental health crises from electronic health records
Garriga, R., Mas, J., Abraha, S., Nolan, J., Harrison, O., Tadros, G., & Matic, A. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01811-5 · Cited by 229
MentalBERT: Publicly Available Pretrained Language Models for Mental Healthcare
Ji, S., Zhang, T., Ansari, L., Fu, J., Tiwari, P., & Cambria, E. (2022) · Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference · doi:10.63317/2d7umxifj8wz · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Su, C., Xu, Z., Pathak, J., & Wang, F.
- Affiliations
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Fei
- Venue
- Translational Psychiatry
- Published
- 2020-04-22
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 116-116
- ISSN
- 2158-3188 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7293215
- OpenAlex
- W3034674374
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 139
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Translational Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- deep learning, mental health outcomes, depression, artificial intelligence in psychiatry, medical data analysis, social media data, diagnosis and prognosis, clinical decision support
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Mental Health, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review