Cited by 251Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationDigital Mental Health InterventionsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

From promise to practice: towards the realisation of AI-informed mental health care

Open access
Koutsouleris, Nikolaos, Hauser, Tobias U, Skvortsova, Vasilisa, De Choudhury, Munmun·2022·The Lancet Digital Health

Abstract

In this Series paper, we explore the promises and challenges of artificial intelligence (AI)-based precision medicine tools in mental health care from clinical, ethical, and regulatory perspectives. The real-world implementation of these tools is increasingly considered the prime solution for key issues in mental health, such as delayed, inaccurate, and inefficient care delivery. Similarly, machine-learning-based empirical strategies are becoming commonplace in psychiatric research because of their potential to adequately deconstruct the biopsychosocial complexity of mental health disorders, and hence to improve nosology of prognostic and preventive paradigms. However, the implementation steps needed to translate these promises into practice are currently hampered by multiple interacting challenges. These obstructions range from the current technology-distant state of clinical practice, over the lack of valid real-world databases required to feed data-intensive AI algorithms, to model development and validation considerations being disconnected from the core principles of clinical utility and ethical acceptability. In this Series paper, we provide recommendations on how these challenges could be addressed from an interdisciplinary perspective to pave the way towards a framework for mental health care, leveraging the combined strengths of human intelligence and AI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00153-4

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There exists the risk that LLMs perpetuate inequities and stigma, further widening mental health disparities.

    “There exists the risk that LLMs perpetuate inequities and stigma, further widening mental health disparities [47].”
  • The absence of ethical considerations in WoeBot and Wysa becomes evident in their responses to emergencies such as immediate harm or suicidal ideation, where they lack clinical grounding and contextual awareness.

    “The absence of ethical considerations in WoeBot and Wysa becomes evident in their responses to emergencies such as immediate harm or suicidal ideation, where they lack clinical grounding and contextual awareness (Koutsouleris et al., 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 24 Bzdok D, Karrer TM, Habel U, Schneider F. Big data approaches in psychiatry: examples in depression research. Nervenarzt 2018; 89: 869-74 (in German).
  2. 43 D'Alfonso S. AI in mental health. Curr Opin Psychol 2020; 36: 112-17 .
  3. 48 Aulamo M, Sulubacak U, Virpioja S, Tiedemann J. OpusTools and parallel corpus diagnostics. Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference. France: European Language Resources Association, 2020. 3782-89.
  4. 69 Wei Q, Ji Z, Si Y, et al. Relation extraction from clinical narratives using pre-trained language models. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. American Medical Informatics Association, 2019: 1236-45.
  5. 84 Pawar U, O'Shea D, Rea S, O'Reilly R. Explainable AI in healthcare. 2020 International Conference on Cyber Situational Awareness, Data Analytics and Assessment (CyberSA). Dublin, Ireland. IEEE 2020: 1-2.
  6. 117 Bartoletti I. AI in healthcare: ethical and privacy challenges. Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine in Europe. Singapore: Springer, 2019: 7-10.
  7. 122 Committee on the Learning Health Care System in America, Institute of Medicine. Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America. Washington: National Academies Press, 2013. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ books/NBK207225/ (accessed May 14, 2022).
  8. 124 Horvitz EJ. Reflections on challenges and promises of mixedinitiative interaction. AI Mag 2007; 28: 19-22.
  9. 125 Todd PM, Gigerenzer G. What is ecological rationality? Ecological Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koutsouleris, N., Hauser, T. U., Skvortsova, V., & De Choudhury, M.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Koutsouleris, Nikolaos
Venue
The Lancet Digital Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
4
Issue
11
Pages
e829-e840
ISSN
2589-7500 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4304112197
Cited by
251
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2027689, 1816403)
  • Emory University
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (27023)
  • Wellcome Trust (211155, 211155/Z/18/Z)
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Jacobs Foundation (2017-1261-04, 27023)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Injury Prevention Research Center
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH117172)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
artificial intelligence in mental health care, precision medicine, machine learning, implementation barriers, clinical utility, moral acceptability, regulatory considerations, real-world data, model validation, biopsychosocial model, human-AI collaboration
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review