Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 286 of the 286 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Promises and challenges of adoptive T-cell therapies for solid tumours

Open access
Morotti, Matteo, Albukhari, Ashwag, Alsaadi, Abdulkhaliq, Artibani, Mara, Brenton, James D., Curbishley, Stuart M., Dong, Tao, Dustin, Michael L., Hu, Zhiyuan, McGranahan, Nicholas, Miller, Martin L., Santana-Gonzalez, Laura, Seymour, Leonard W., Shi, Tingyan, Van Loo, Peter, Yau, Christopher, White, Helen, Wietek, Nina, Church, David N., Wedge, David C., Ahmed, Ahmed A.·2021·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide and, despite new targeted therapies and immunotherapies, many patients with advanced-stage- or high-risk cancers still die, owing to metastatic disease. Adoptive T-cell therapy, involving the autologous or allogeneic transplant of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes or genetically modified T cells expressing novel T-cell receptors or chimeric antigen receptors, has shown promise in the treatment of cancer patients, leading to durable responses and, in some cases, cure. Technological advances in genomics, computational biology, immunology and cell manufacturing have brought the aspiration of individualised therapies for cancer patients closer to reality. This new era of cell-based individualised therapeutics challenges the traditional standards of therapeutic interventions and provides opportunities for a paradigm shift in our approach to cancer therapy. Invited speakers at a 2020 symposium discussed three areas—cancer genomics, cancer immunology and cell-therapy manufacturing—that are essential to the effective translation of T-cell therapies in the treatment of solid malignancies. Key advances have been made in understanding genetic intratumour heterogeneity, and strategies to accurately identify neoantigens, overcome T-cell exhaustion and circumvent tumour immunosuppression after cell-therapy infusion are being developed. Advances are being made in cell-manufacturing approaches that have the potential to establish cell-therapies as credible therapeutic options. T-cell therapies face many challenges but hold great promise for improving clinical outcomes for patients with solid tumours.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41416-021-01353-6

Cites

286 of 286 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 286 references

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Morotti, M., Albukhari, A., Alsaadi, A., Artibani, M., Brenton, J. D., Curbishley, S. M., Dong, T., Dustin, M. L., Hu, Z., McGranahan, N., Miller, M. L., Santana-Gonzalez, L., Seymour, L. W., Shi, T., Van Loo, P., Yau, C., White, H., Wietek, N., Church, D. N., Wedge, D. C., & Ahmed, A. A.
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2021-03-29
Volume
124
Issue
11
Pages
1759-1776
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W3126515851
Cited by
269
References
286
FWCI
15.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Promises and challenges of adoptive T-cell therapies for solid tumours. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41416-021-01353-6
The paper
Morotti, M., Albukhari, A., Alsaadi, A., Artibani, M., Brenton, J. D., Curbishley, S. M., Dong, T., Dustin, M. L., Hu, Z., McGranahan, N., Miller, M. L., Santana-Gonzalez, L., Seymour, L. W., Shi, T., Van Loo, P., Yau, C., White, H., Wietek, N., Church, D. N., . . . Ahmed, A. A. (2021). Promises and challenges of adoptive T-cell therapies for solid tumours. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01353-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.