Cited by 376Retinal Imaging and AnalysisRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsAI in cancer detection

Artificial intelligence for diabetic retinopathy screening: a review

Open access
Grzybowski, Andrzej, Brona, Piotr, Lim, Gilbert, Ruamviboonsuk, Paisan, Tan, Gavin S. W., Abramoff, Michael, Ting, Daniel S. W.·2020·Eye

Abstract

Diabetes is a global eye health issue. Given the rising in diabetes prevalence and ageing population, this poses significant challenge to perform diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening for these patients. Artificial intelligence (AI) using machine learning and deep learning have been adopted by various groups to develop automated DR detection algorithms. This article aims to describe the state-of-art AI DR screening technologies that have been described in the literature, some of which are already commercially available. All these technologies were designed using different training datasets and technical methodologies. Although many groups have published robust diagnostic performance of the AI algorithms for DR screening, future research is required to address several challenges, for examples medicolegal implications, ethics, and clinical deployment model in order to expedite the translation of these novel technologies into the healthcare setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41433-019-0566-0

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pappuru RK, Ribeiro L, Lobo C, Alves D, Cunha-Vaz J. Micro- aneurysm turnover is a predictor of diabetic retinopathy progres- sion. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;103:222-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grzybowski, A., Brona, P., Lim, G., Ruamviboonsuk, P., Tan, G. S. W., Abramoff, M., & Ting, D. S. W.
Affiliations
  • Foundation for the Development of Ophthalmology (PL)
  • University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Rajavithi Hospital (TH)
Corresponding author
Ting, Daniel S. W.
Venue
Eye
Published
2019-09-05
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
451-460
ISSN
  • 0078-5334 (ISSN-L)
  • 0950-222X
  • 1476-5454
OpenAlex
W2972246881
Cited by
376
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Eye (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
diabetic retinopathy, retinopathy screening, artificial intelligence, automated detection algorithm, deep learning, machine learning, medicolegal issues, ethics, clinical deployment
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Retinopathy, Humans, Mass Screening

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review