Cited by 143Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationInnovations in Medical EducationArtificial Intelligence in Education

Undergraduate Medical Students’ and Interns’ Knowledge and Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Open access
Jha, Nisha, Shankar, Pathiyil Ravi, Al-Betar, Mohammed Azmi, Mukhia, Rupesh, Hada, Kabita, Palaian, Subish·2022·Advances in Medical Education and Practice

Abstract

Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) is playing an increasingly important role in healthcare and health professions education. This study explored medical students' and interns' knowledge of artificial intelligence (AI), perceptions of the role of AI in medicine, and preferences around the teaching of AI competencies. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the authors used a previously validated Canadian questionnaire and gathered responses from students and interns at KIST Medical College, Nepal. Face validity and reliability of the tool were assessed by administering the questionnaire to 20 alumni as a pilot sample (Cronbach alpha = 0.6). Survey results were analyzed quantitatively (p-value = 0.05). Results: In total 216 students (37% response rate) participated. The median AI knowledge score was 11 (interquartile range 4), and the maximum possible score was 25. The score was higher among final year students (p = 0.006) and among those with additional training in AI (p = 0.040). Over 49% strongly agreed or agreed that AI will reduce the number of jobs for doctors. Many expect AI to impact their specialty choice, felt the Nepalese health-care system is ill-equipped to deal with the challenges of AI, and opined every student of medicine should receive training on AI competencies. Conclusion: The lack of coverage of AI and machine learning in Nepalese medical schools has resulted in students being unaware of AI's impact on individual patients and the healthcare system. A high perceived willingness among respondents to learn about AI is a positive sign and a strong indicator of futuristic successful curricula changes. Systematic implementation of AI in the Nepalese healthcare system can be a potential tool in addressing health-care challenges related to resource and manpower constraints. Incorporating topics related to AI and machine learning in medical curricula can be a useful first step.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/amep.s368519

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [14]Government of Nepal Ministry of Health and Population. Progress of the health and population sector, 2019/20. Kathmandu: National Joint Annual Review Report – 2020 (2077 BS); 2020. Available from: http://www.nhssp.org.np/Resources/HPP/NJAR%20-%20Final%20Report.pdf. Accessed February 28, 2022.
  2. [19]de Moraes Lopes MH, Ferreira DD, Ferreira AC, et al. Use of artificial intelligence in precision nutrition and fitness. In: Artificial Intelligence in Precision Health. Academic Press; 2020: 465– 496.
  3. [31]UserTesting. Healthcare chatbot apps are on the rise but the overall customer experience (cx) falls short according to a UserTesting report. San Francisco: UserTesting; 2019 Available from: https://ir.usertesting.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/64/healthcare-chatbot-apps-are-on-The-rise-but-The-overall. Accessed Mar 1, 2022.
  4. [36]Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European commission, directorate-general for communications networks, content and technology. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI, Publications Office; 2019. Available from: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/177365. Accessed Mar 1, 2022. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jha, N., Shankar, P. R., Al-Betar, M. A., Mukhia, R., Hada, K., & Palaian, S.
Affiliations
  • KIST Medical College (NP)
  • IMU University (MY)
  • Ajman University (AE)
Corresponding author
  • Jha, Nisha
  • Palaian, Subish
Venue
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Published
2022-08
Volume
Volume 13
Pages
927-937
ISSN
1179-7258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293282468
Cited by
143
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 1
FWCI
8.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Medical Education and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
University of Toronto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, medical students, medical interns, AI knowledge, perceptions of AI, AI competencies, machine learning, job displacement fears, specialty choice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review