CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 249Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsBarrier Structure and Function Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Competitive repopulation of an empty microglial niche yields functionally distinct subsets of microglia-like cells

Open access
Lund, Harald, Pieber, Melanie, Parsa, Roham, Han, Jinming, Grommisch, David, Ewing, Ewoud, Kular, Lara, Needhamsen, Maria, Espinosa, Alexander, Nilsson, Emma, Överby, Anna K., Butovsky, Oleg, Jagodic, Maja, Zhang, Xing-Mei, Harris, Robert A.·2018·Nature Communications
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-07295-7PMC PMC6242869
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Circulating monocytes can compete for virtually any tissue macrophage niche and become long-lived replacements that are phenotypically indistinguishable from their embryonic counterparts. As the factors regulating this process are incompletely understood, we studied niche competition in the brain by depleting microglia with >95% efficiency using Cx3cr1 CreER/+ R26 DTA/+ mice and monitored long-term repopulation. Here we show that the microglial niche is repopulated within weeks by a combination of local proliferation of CX3CR1 + F4/80 low Clec12a – microglia and infiltration of CX3CR1 + F4/80 hi Clec12a + macrophages that arise directly from Ly6C hi monocytes. This colonization is independent of blood brain barrier breakdown, paralleled by vascular activation, and regulated by type I interferon. Ly6C hi monocytes upregulate microglia gene expression and adopt microglia DNA methylation signatures, but retain a distinct gene signature from proliferating microglia, displaying altered surface marker expression, phagocytic capacity and cytokine production. Our results demonstrate that monocytes are imprinted by the CNS microenvironment but remain transcriptionally, epigenetically and functionally distinct.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-018-07295-7

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Kinetics of depletion and repopulation of microglia in Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ mice. a Dot plots detailing depletion and repopulation of microglia in Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ mice on the indicated days after TAM administration. Top panel is gated on live singlet cells. Bottom panel is gated on CD11b+CD45+Ly6C–Ly6G–. b Quantification of CX3CR1+F4/80low and CX3CR1+F4/80hi populations by flow cytometry. n = 12, 5, 9 mice, mean ± s.e.m. ***p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test. Data are pooled from three separate experiments. The experiment was repeated twice for each time point. c Surface expression by flow cytometry on repopulated F4/80low and F4/80hi cells at day 28 compared to naive microglia. Gated on CD11b+CD45+Ly6C–Ly6G–. n = 4 mice/group. Lines represent mean values. The experiment was performed twice. d Quantification of P2ry12 and CX3CR1-YFP staining in the indicated brain regions. Representative images are from the cortex. n = 3–7 mice/group, mean ± s.e.m. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test. Scale bar top panel 200 µm, bottom three panels 50 µm. Hippo. Hippocampus. Thal. Thalamus
Fig. 1 Kinetics of depletion and repopulation of microglia in Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ mice. a Dot plots detailing depletion and repopulation of microglia in Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ mice on the indicated days after TAM administration. Top panel is gated on live singlet cells. Bottom panel is gated on CD11b+CD45+Ly6C–Ly6G–. b Quantification of CX3CR1+F4/80low and CX3CR1+F4/80hi populations by flow cytometry. n = 12, 5, 9 mice, mean ± s.e.m. ***p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test. Data are pooled from three separate experiments. The experiment was repeated twice for each time point. c Surface expression by flow cytometry on repopulated F4/80low and F4/80hi cells at day 28 compared to naive microglia. Gated on CD11b+CD45+Ly6C–Ly6G–. n = 4 mice/group. Lines represent mean values. The experiment was performed twice. d Quantification of P2ry12 and CX3CR1-YFP staining in the indicated brain regions. Representative images are from the cortex. n = 3–7 mice/group, mean ± s.e.m. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test. Scale bar top panel 200 µm, bottom three panels 50 µm. Hippo. Hippocampus. Thal. ThalamusCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Repopulating microglia have dual origins. a Analysis of chimerism in F4/80low and F4/80hi populations in CD45.1 chimeras. Top panel gated on CD11b+F4/80+Ly6C–Ly6G–. Bottom panels gated on F4/80low and F4/80hi as indicated. Percentages are mean ± s.d. of n = 5 mice/group. The experiment was performed twice. b Analysis of chimerism in Cx3cr1GFP/+Ccr2RFP/+ → Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ chimeras that had received busulfan chemotherapeutic for myeloablation. Successful separation of GFP+ and YFP+ populations is demonstrated in Supplementary Fig. 3. Blood is gated on CD11b+Ly6G–CD115+Ly6Chi and CNS is gated on CD11b + Ly6C–. Values in plots are mean ± s.d of n = 4 and six mice. The experiment was performed once. c Quantification of CX3CR1-YFP+Ki67+ proliferating microglia in the indicated brain regions. Representative images are from the hippocampus. n = 4–5 mice/group. Lines represent mean values. ***p < 0.001, *p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test. Scale bar 20 μm. d Proliferation in repopulating F4/80low microglia assessed by EdU. EdU was administered in the drinking water for 14 days during the indicated time periods after TAM. Control mice were given EdU days 0–14 after TAM. Gated on CD11b+Ly6C–Ly6G–CX3CR1+F4/80low. n = 3–4 mice/group, the experiment was performed twice. Lines represent mean values. ***p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test
Fig. 2 Repopulating microglia have dual origins. a Analysis of chimerism in F4/80low and F4/80hi populations in CD45.1 chimeras. Top panel gated on CD11b+F4/80+Ly6C–Ly6G–. Bottom panels gated on F4/80low and F4/80hi as indicated. Percentages are mean ± s.d. of n = 5 mice/group. The experiment was performed twice. b Analysis of chimerism in Cx3cr1GFP/+Ccr2RFP/+ → Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ chimeras that had received busulfan chemotherapeutic for myeloablation. Successful separation of GFP+ and YFP+ populations is demonstrated in Supplementary Fig. 3. Blood is gated on CD11b+Ly6G–CD115+Ly6Chi and CNS is gated on CD11b + Ly6C–. Values in plots are mean ± s.d of n = 4 and six mice. The experiment was performed once. c Quantification of CX3CR1-YFP+Ki67+ proliferating microglia in the indicated brain regions. Representative images are from the hippocampus. n = 4–5 mice/group. Lines represent mean values. ***p < 0.001, *p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test. Scale bar 20 μm. d Proliferation in repopulating F4/80low microglia assessed by EdU. EdU was administered in the drinking water for 14 days during the indicated time periods after TAM. Control mice were given EdU days 0–14 after TAM. Gated on CD11b+Ly6C–Ly6G–CX3CR1+F4/80low. n = 3–4 mice/group, the experiment was performed twice. Lines represent mean values. ***p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison testCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 F4/80hi macrophages are derived from CCR2+Ly6Chi monocytes. a Analysis of BM, blood and CNS chimerism in WT:Ccr2–/– → Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ competitive chimeras. In all organs gated on live singlet cells. n = 9 mice. The experiment was performed twice. b Kinetic analysis of Ly6Chi monocytes in relation to F4/80low microglia and F4/80hi macrophages in the CNS during depletion in Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ mice. Representative flow cytometry plots are gated on CD11b+CD45hiLy6G– cells. Ly6Chi, F4/80low, and F4/80hi gated as indicated in Supplementary Fig. 1. Data is from two pooled experiments. n = 12, 3, 7, 6, 5, 7, 6, 7 mice/time point. Connecting lines represent mean values. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test. c Activation of the cerebral vasculature as assessed by ICAM-1 staining on day 2 after TAM administration. Quantification was performed in the thalamus on n = 3 and 4 mice/group and 3 sections/mouse. Scale bar 25 µm. Lines represent mean values. ***p < 0.001 by Student’s unpaired two-tailed t-test. d Analysis of reconstitution of the F4/80low and F4/80hi compartments after adoptive transfer of 1.7–3.0 × 106 Ly6Chi monocytes/day from Cx3cr1GFP/+Ccr2RFP/+ mice into microglia-depleted Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ mice on days 0, 1, and 2 after TAM administration. Gated on CD11b + Ly6C–. Analysis of CNS was performed day 14 after TAM administration. Successful separation of GFP and YFP signals is demonstrated in Supplementary Fig. 3. Values are mean ± s.d of 4 mice/group. The experiment was performed once
Fig. 3 F4/80hi macrophages are derived from CCR2+Ly6Chi monocytes. a Analysis of BM, blood and CNS chimerism in WT:Ccr2–/– → Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ competitive chimeras. In all organs gated on live singlet cells. n = 9 mice. The experiment was performed twice. b Kinetic analysis of Ly6Chi monocytes in relation to F4/80low microglia and F4/80hi macrophages in the CNS during depletion in Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ mice. Representative flow cytometry plots are gated on CD11b+CD45hiLy6G– cells. Ly6Chi, F4/80low, and F4/80hi gated as indicated in Supplementary Fig. 1. Data is from two pooled experiments. n = 12, 3, 7, 6, 5, 7, 6, 7 mice/time point. Connecting lines represent mean values. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test. c Activation of the cerebral vasculature as assessed by ICAM-1 staining on day 2 after TAM administration. Quantification was performed in the thalamus on n = 3 and 4 mice/group and 3 sections/mouse. Scale bar 25 µm. Lines represent mean values. ***p < 0.001 by Student’s unpaired two-tailed t-test. d Analysis of reconstitution of the F4/80low and F4/80hi compartments after adoptive transfer of 1.7–3.0 × 106 Ly6Chi monocytes/day from Cx3cr1GFP/+Ccr2RFP/+ mice into microglia-depleted Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ mice on days 0, 1, and 2 after TAM administration. Gated on CD11b + Ly6C–. Analysis of CNS was performed day 14 after TAM administration. Successful separation of GFP and YFP signals is demonstrated in Supplementary Fig. 3. Values are mean ± s.d of 4 mice/group. The experiment was performed onceCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Gene expression profile of repopulating microglia/macrophages. a FACS purities of sorted F4/80low and F4/80hi populations. b PCA of microarray expression profiles. n(biological + technical) = 2 GMP, 2 CMP, 3 + 2 Ly6Chi, 2 RPM, 2 int. mac, 3 + 2 naive microglia, 2 DTR, 3 F4/80low 4w, 3 F4/80low 12w, 2 F4/80hi 4w, 3 F4/80hi 12w. Naive microglia were sorted from Cx3cr1CreER/+ mice that received TAM. DTR microglia were sorted from Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTR/+ mice 14 days after DT administration. F4/80low and F4/80hi subsets in Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ mice were sorted 4 and 12 weeks after TAM administration. RPM, int. mac, CMP, GMP, and Ly6Chi monocytes were sorted from naive mice. Int. mac. intestinal macrophage. Sorting strategies are detailed in the Methods section. Each sample represents pools of 2–5 mice. c Heat map (z-scores) of expression profiles of 15 microglia-specific genes. d Heat map (z-scores) of expression profiles of microglia-specific transcription factors. e Microarray expression counts of Tgfbr1. Lines represent mean values
Fig. 4 Gene expression profile of repopulating microglia/macrophages. a FACS purities of sorted F4/80low and F4/80hi populations. b PCA of microarray expression profiles. n(biological + technical) = 2 GMP, 2 CMP, 3 + 2 Ly6Chi, 2 RPM, 2 int. mac, 3 + 2 naive microglia, 2 DTR, 3 F4/80low 4w, 3 F4/80low 12w, 2 F4/80hi 4w, 3 F4/80hi 12w. Naive microglia were sorted from Cx3cr1CreER/+ mice that received TAM. DTR microglia were sorted from Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTR/+ mice 14 days after DT administration. F4/80low and F4/80hi subsets in Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ mice were sorted 4 and 12 weeks after TAM administration. RPM, int. mac, CMP, GMP, and Ly6Chi monocytes were sorted from naive mice. Int. mac. intestinal macrophage. Sorting strategies are detailed in the Methods section. Each sample represents pools of 2–5 mice. c Heat map (z-scores) of expression profiles of 15 microglia-specific genes. d Heat map (z-scores) of expression profiles of microglia-specific transcription factors. e Microarray expression counts of Tgfbr1. Lines represent mean valuesCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Monocyte-derived macrophages are transcriptionally and functionally distinct from resident and proliferating microglia. a FC/FC plots comparing differential gene expression in F4/80low and F4/80hi subsets with naive microglia, respectively, after 4 and 12 weeks. b Heat map (z-scores) of 1137 genes differentially expressed (>2 fold change both directions, adj. p < 0.05) between naive microglia and F4/80hi 12 week subsets. c Venn diagram of differential gene expression between naive microglia, F4/80low and F4/80hi subsets at 12 weeks. d F4/80hi and F4/80low gene signature; Top 50 up/down-regulated genes in F4/80hi macrophages compared to both naive microglia and F4/80low microglia at 12 weeks. e Clec12a, CD36, CXCR4 surface expression in F4/80low and F4/80hi subsets analyzed by flow cytometry. Gated on CX3CR1hiCD11b+ cells from Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ mice > 5 weeks after TAM. f Phagocytosis of pHrodo Red E. coli microparticles and pHrodo Red-labeled myelin in CD11b-enriched CNS cells, stained with F4/80 to gate on CX3CR1+F4/80low (red) and CX3CR1+F4/80hi (blue) subsets in Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ mice 5 weeks after TAM. Naive CX3CR1+F4/80low microglia were used as control. Lines represent mean values. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 by Student’s paired two-tailed t-test (comparing F4/80low and F4/80hi)
Fig. 5 Monocyte-derived macrophages are transcriptionally and functionally distinct from resident and proliferating microglia. a FC/FC plots comparing differential gene expression in F4/80low and F4/80hi subsets with naive microglia, respectively, after 4 and 12 weeks. b Heat map (z-scores) of 1137 genes differentially expressed (>2 fold change both directions, adj. p < 0.05) between naive microglia and F4/80hi 12 week subsets. c Venn diagram of differential gene expression between naive microglia, F4/80low and F4/80hi subsets at 12 weeks. d F4/80hi and F4/80low gene signature; Top 50 up/down-regulated genes in F4/80hi macrophages compared to both naive microglia and F4/80low microglia at 12 weeks. e Clec12a, CD36, CXCR4 surface expression in F4/80low and F4/80hi subsets analyzed by flow cytometry. Gated on CX3CR1hiCD11b+ cells from Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ mice > 5 weeks after TAM. f Phagocytosis of pHrodo Red E. coli microparticles and pHrodo Red-labeled myelin in CD11b-enriched CNS cells, stained with F4/80 to gate on CX3CR1+F4/80low (red) and CX3CR1+F4/80hi (blue) subsets in Cx3cr1CreER/+R26DTA/+ mice 5 weeks after TAM. Naive CX3CR1+F4/80low microglia were used as control. Lines represent mean values. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 by Student’s paired two-tailed t-test (comparing F4/80low and F4/80hi)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 Monocyte-derived macrophages adopt a conserved gene signature associated with neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. a–d Expression (z-scores) of the F4/80low and F4/80hi gene signatures from Fig. 5d in published datasets. These studies were chosen because they compared the transcriptomic profiles of CNS-infiltrating macrophages with resident microglia, with or without microglial depletion. Normalized RNA-seq expression counts were used to plot the data. WBI whole body irradiation. ICT intracerebral transplantation. e Gene set enrichment analysis visualized using BubbleGum. Color indicates the cell subset showing enrichment, and the size and color of circles represent enrichment score and significance, respectively. Numbers in parentheses denote the number of genes in the gene set. BMDM bone-marrow derived macrophage MgND neurodegeneration-associated microglia
Fig. 6 Monocyte-derived macrophages adopt a conserved gene signature associated with neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. a–d Expression (z-scores) of the F4/80low and F4/80hi gene signatures from Fig. 5d in published datasets. These studies were chosen because they compared the transcriptomic profiles of CNS-infiltrating macrophages with resident microglia, with or without microglial depletion. Normalized RNA-seq expression counts were used to plot the data. WBI whole body irradiation. ICT intracerebral transplantation. e Gene set enrichment analysis visualized using BubbleGum. Color indicates the cell subset showing enrichment, and the size and color of circles represent enrichment score and significance, respectively. Numbers in parentheses denote the number of genes in the gene set. BMDM bone-marrow derived macrophage MgND neurodegeneration-associated microgliaCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 7 Type I IFNs regulate niche colonization. a Analysis of enrichment of hallmark gene sets visualized using BubbleGum. Color indicates the cell subset showing enrichment, and the size and color of circles represent enrichment score and significance, respectively. b Top activated upstream regulators using ingenuity pathway analysis. c Microarray expression counts of type I IFN receptors and response genes. Lines represent mean values. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 by Student’s unpaired two-tailed t-test comparing F4/80low and F4/80hi. d Analysis of chimerism in WT:Ifnar1–/– competitive chimeras before TAM administration (blood) or 3 weeks after TAM (CNS). Blood is gated on CD11b+SSClowLy6Chi monocytes and CNS on CD11b+F4/80hi. n = 4 mice. The experiment was performed once. ***p < 0.001 by Student’s paired two-tailed t-test
Fig. 7 Type I IFNs regulate niche colonization. a Analysis of enrichment of hallmark gene sets visualized using BubbleGum. Color indicates the cell subset showing enrichment, and the size and color of circles represent enrichment score and significance, respectively. b Top activated upstream regulators using ingenuity pathway analysis. c Microarray expression counts of type I IFN receptors and response genes. Lines represent mean values. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 by Student’s unpaired two-tailed t-test comparing F4/80low and F4/80hi. d Analysis of chimerism in WT:Ifnar1–/– competitive chimeras before TAM administration (blood) or 3 weeks after TAM (CNS). Blood is gated on CD11b+SSClowLy6Chi monocytes and CNS on CD11b+F4/80hi. n = 4 mice. The experiment was performed once. ***p < 0.001 by Student’s paired two-tailed t-testCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 70 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–249 of 249

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lund, H., Pieber, M., Parsa, R., Han, J., Grommisch, D., Ewing, E., Kular, L., Needhamsen, M., Espinosa, A., Nilsson, E., Överby, A. K., Butovsky, O., Jagodic, M., Zhang, X.-M., & Harris, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Harris, Robert A.
ORCID
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-11-19
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
4845-4845
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41467-018-07295-7
PMC
PMC6242869
OpenAlex
W2901905540
Cited by
249
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 17
FWCI
9.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Hjärnfonden
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Alzheimerfonden
  • Science for Life Laboratory
  • Servier
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS088137)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
microglia, niche competition, CX3CR1, CLEC12A, Ly6Chi monocytes, microglia-like cells, type I interferon, DNA methylation, epigenetic imprinting, phagocytosis, microglial proliferation, brain macrophages, vascular activation, blood-brain barrier
MeSH terms
CX3C Chemokine Receptor 1, Animals, Antigens, Differentiation, Antigens, Ly, Bacterial Proteins, Bone Marrow Cells, Brain, Gene Expression Regulation, Interferon Type I, Luminescent Proteins, Macrophages, Mice, Transgenic, Monocytes, Phagocytosis, Receptors, Mitogen, Whole-Body Irradiation, Signal Transduction, Microglia, Genes, Reporter, Transplantation Chimera, Cell Lineage, DNA Methylation, Adoptive Transfer, Lectins, C-Type, Cell Proliferation, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review