Cited by 120Machine Learning in Materials ScienceComputational Drug Discovery MethodsCrystal Structures and Properties

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Network analysis of synthesizable materials discovery

Open access

Abstract

Assessing the synthesizability of inorganic materials is a grand challenge for accelerating their discovery using computations. Synthesis of a material is a complex process that depends not only on its thermodynamic stability with respect to others, but also on factors from kinetics, to advances in synthesis techniques, to the availability of precursors. This complexity makes the development of a general theory or first-principles approach to synthesizability currently impractical. Here we show how an alternative pathway to predicting synthesizability emerges from the dynamics of the materials stability network: a scale-free network constructed by combining the convex free-energy surface of inorganic materials computed by high-throughput density functional theory and their experimental discovery timelines extracted from citations. The time-evolution of the underlying network properties allows us to use machine-learning to predict the likelihood that hypothetical, computer-generated materials will be amenable to successful experimental synthesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-10030-5

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining ab initio calculations with simple substitutions has allowed researchers to improve to 48,000 computationally stable materials according to the paper's own recalculations.

    “Combining ab initio calculations with simple substitutions has allowed researchers to improve to 48,000 computationally stable materials according to our own recalculations22–24 (see Methods).”

    From Scaling deep learning for materials discovery (2023) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Introduction and Methods describe high-throughput ab initio calculations used to assess the stability of inorganic materials. The Results report approximately 22,000 stable materials discovered, not 48,000; the paper does not substantiate the claimed total or its derivation through simple substitutions. In the printed citing sentence, “our own recalculations” refers to the citing authors, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Hemminger, J. C., Sarrao, J., Crabtree, G., Flemming, G. and Ratner, M., Challenges at the Frontiers of Matter and Energy: Transformative Opportunities for Discovery Science. Technical Report (USDOE Office of Science (SC), United States, 2015). · DOI
  2. Sun, W. et al. The thermodynamic scale of inorganic crystalline metastability. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600225–e1600225 (2016). · DOI
  3. Aykol, M., Dwaraknath, S. S., Sun, W. & Persson, K. A. Thermodynamic limit for synthesis of metastable inorganic materials. Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq0148 (2018). · DOI
  4. Alberi, K., et al. The 2018 materials by design roadmap. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52, 013001 (2018). · DOI
  5. Kirklin, S. et al. The open quantum materials database (OQMD): assessing the accuracy of DFT formation energies. npj Comput. Mater. 1, 15010 (2015). · DOI
  6. Saal, J. E. et al. Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: the open quantum materials database (OQMD). JOM 65, 1501–1509 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Curtarolo, S. et al. AFLOWLIB.ORG: a distributed materials properties repository from high-throughput ab initio calculations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 58, 227–235 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Barabási, A.-L. The physics of the Web. Phys. World 14, 33–38 (2001). · DOI
  9. Newman, M. E. J. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 404–409 (2001). · DOI
  10. Albert, R. & Barabasi, A.-L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Barabási, A.-L. Scale-free networks: a decade andbeyond. Science 325, 412–413 (2009). · DOI
  12. Rzhetsky, A., Foster, J. G., Foster, I. T. & Evans, J. A. Choosing experiments toaccelerate collective discovery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14569–14574 (2015). · DOI
  13. Belsky, A., Hellenbrandt, M., Karen, V. L. & Luksch, P. Newdevelopments in the inorganic crystal structure database (ICSD):accessibility in support of materials research and design. Acta Crystallogr. B 58, 364–369 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Gražulis, S. et al. Crystallography open database {–} an open-access collection of crystal structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 42, 726–729 (2009). · DOI
  15. Hegde, V. I., Aykol, M., Kirklin, S., Wolverton, C., The phase diagram of all inorganic materials. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.10869 (2018). · arXiv
  16. Leskovec, J., Kleinberg, J., Faloutsos, C. Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 1, 1, 1–41 (2007). https://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1217299.1217301 · DOI
  17. Pedarsani, P., Figueiredo, D. R. & Grossglauser, M. Densification arising from sampling fixed graphs, ACM SIGMETRICS performance. Eval. Rev. 36, 205 (2008). · DOI
  18. Barabási, A.-L. The scale free property. In Network Science. Ch. 4, 112–163 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016).
  19. Barabasi, A.-L. & Albert, R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kim, S. et al. Material design of high-capacity Li-rich layered-oxide electrodes: Li2MnO3 and beyond. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 2201–2211 (2017). · DOI
  21. Emery, A. A., Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Hegde, V. I. & Wolverton, C. High-throughput computational screening of perovskites for thermochemical water splitting applications. Chem. Mater. 28, 5621–5634 (2016). · DOI
  22. Ma J., et al., Computational investigation of inverse-Heusler compounds for spintronics applications. Phys. Rev. B 98 094410 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.094410 · DOI
  23. Ruhnau, B. Eigenvector-centrality—a node-centrality. Soc. Netw. 22, 357–365 (2000). · DOI
  24. Dietterich, T. G. Machine learning for sequential data: a review. Struct., Syntactic, Stat. Pattern Recognit., Jt. IAPR Int. Workshops SSPR2002 SPR 2002 2396, 15–30 (2002).
  25. Weiss G. M. and Hirsh H., Learning to predict rare events in event sequences, in KDD’98 Proceedings of the Fourth InternationalConference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (AAAI Press, 1998) pp. 359–363.
  26. Bhardwaj, N., Gupta, A. & Uma, S. Evidence of cationic mixingand ordering in the honeycomb layer of Li4MSbO6(M(iii) = Cr, Mn, Al, Ga)(S.G. C2/c) oxides. Dalton Trans. 43, 12050–12057 (2014). · DOI
  27. Sathiya, M. et al. Tarascon, Li4NiTeO6 as a positive electrode for Li-ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 49, 11376–11378 (2013). · DOI
  28. Balachandran, P. V. et al. Predictions of new ABO3 perovskite compounds by combining machine learningand density functional theory. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 043802 (2018). · DOI
  29. Shukla, R., Arya, A. & Tyagi, A. K. Interconversion of perovskite and fluorite structures in Ce-Sc-O system. Inorg. Chem. 49, 1152–1157 (2010). · DOI
  30. Akamatsu, H. et al. Crystal and electronic structure and magnetic properties of divalent europium perovskite oxides Eu M O3(M = Ti, Zr, and Hf): experimental and first-principles approaches. Inorg. Chem. 51, 4560–4567 (2012). · DOI
  31. Hautier, G., Ong, S., Jain, A., Moore, C. & Ceder, G. Accuracy of density functional theory in predicting formation energies of ternary oxides frombinary oxides and its implication on phase stability. Phys. Rev. B 85, 155208 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  32. Hagberg, A. A., Schult, D. A., Swart, P. J., Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using Network X. In Proc. 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy) (eds Varoquaux, G., Vaught, T., & Millman, J.) 11–15 (Pasadena, CA, 2008).
  33. Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R. & Newman, M. E. J. Power-Law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 51, 661–703 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  34. Alstott, J., Ed Bullmore, Plenz, D., Powerlaw: a python package for analysis of heavy-tailed distributions. PLoS ONE 9 (2014), 0.1371/journal.pone.0085777. · DOI
  35. Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aykol, M., Hegde, V. I., Hung, L., Suram, S., Herring, P., Wolverton, C., & Hummelshøj, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Toyota Research Institute (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Aykol, Muratahan
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-05-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
2018-2018
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2808135796
Cited by
120
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DMR-1720,139, 1720139)
  • Toyota Research Institute
  • Materials Research Science and Engineering Center, Harvard University (1720139, DMR-1720139)
  • Division of Materials Research (DMR-1720139, 1720139)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Crystal Structures and Properties
Keywords
synthesizability, scale-free networks, high-throughput density functional theory, machine learning prediction, materials synthesis, thermodynamic stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review