The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network analysis of synthesizable materials discovery
Open accessAbstract
Assessing the synthesizability of inorganic materials is a grand challenge for accelerating their discovery using computations. Synthesis of a material is a complex process that depends not only on its thermodynamic stability with respect to others, but also on factors from kinetics, to advances in synthesis techniques, to the availability of precursors. This complexity makes the development of a general theory or first-principles approach to synthesizability currently impractical. Here we show how an alternative pathway to predicting synthesizability emerges from the dynamics of the materials stability network: a scale-free network constructed by combining the convex free-energy surface of inorganic materials computed by high-throughput density functional theory and their experimental discovery timelines extracted from citations. The time-evolution of the underlying network properties allows us to use machine-learning to predict the likelihood that hypothetical, computer-generated materials will be amenable to successful experimental synthesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Combining ab initio calculations with simple substitutions has allowed researchers to improve to 48,000 computationally stable materials according to the paper's own recalculations.
“Combining ab initio calculations with simple substitutions has allowed researchers to improve to 48,000 computationally stable materials according to our own recalculations22–24 (see Methods).”
From Scaling deep learning for materials discovery (2023) · cites this paper as [24]
The Introduction and Methods describe high-throughput ab initio calculations used to assess the stability of inorganic materials. The Results report approximately 22,000 stable materials discovered, not 48,000; the paper does not substantiate the claimed total or its derivation through simple substitutions. In the printed citing sentence, “our own recalculations” refers to the citing authors, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation
Jain, A., Ong, S. P., Hautier, G., Chen, W., Richards, W. D., Dacek, S., Cholia, S., Gunter, D., Skinner, D., Ceder, G., et al. (2013) · APL Materials · doi:10.1063/1.4812323 · Cited by 13,094
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35019019 · Cited by 7,534
Reproducibility in density functional theory calculations of solids
Lejaeghere, K., Bihlmayer, G., Björkman, T., Blaha, P., Blügel, S., Blum, V., Caliste, D., Castelli, I. E., Clark, S. J., Dal Corso, A., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad3000 · Cited by 1,649
Materials Synthesis Insights from Scientific Literature via Text Extraction and Machine Learning
Kim, E., Huang, K., Saunders, A., McCallum, A., Ceder, G., & Olivetti, E. (2017) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03500 · Cited by 473
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Hemminger, J. C., Sarrao, J., Crabtree, G., Flemming, G. and Ratner, M., Challenges at the Frontiers of Matter and Energy: Transformative Opportunities for Discovery Science. Technical Report (USDOE Office of Science (SC), United States, 2015). · DOI
- Sun, W. et al. The thermodynamic scale of inorganic crystalline metastability. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600225–e1600225 (2016). · DOI
- Aykol, M., Dwaraknath, S. S., Sun, W. & Persson, K. A. Thermodynamic limit for synthesis of metastable inorganic materials. Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq0148 (2018). · DOI
- Alberi, K., et al. The 2018 materials by design roadmap. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52, 013001 (2018). · DOI
- Kirklin, S. et al. The open quantum materials database (OQMD): assessing the accuracy of DFT formation energies. npj Comput. Mater. 1, 15010 (2015). · DOI
- Saal, J. E. et al. Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: the open quantum materials database (OQMD). JOM 65, 1501–1509 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
- Curtarolo, S. et al. AFLOWLIB.ORG: a distributed materials properties repository from high-throughput ab initio calculations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 58, 227–235 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
- Barabási, A.-L. The physics of the Web. Phys. World 14, 33–38 (2001). · DOI
- Newman, M. E. J. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 404–409 (2001). · DOI
- Albert, R. & Barabasi, A.-L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
- Barabási, A.-L. Scale-free networks: a decade andbeyond. Science 325, 412–413 (2009). · DOI
- Rzhetsky, A., Foster, J. G., Foster, I. T. & Evans, J. A. Choosing experiments toaccelerate collective discovery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14569–14574 (2015). · DOI
- Belsky, A., Hellenbrandt, M., Karen, V. L. & Luksch, P. Newdevelopments in the inorganic crystal structure database (ICSD):accessibility in support of materials research and design. Acta Crystallogr. B 58, 364–369 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
- Gražulis, S. et al. Crystallography open database {–} an open-access collection of crystal structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 42, 726–729 (2009). · DOI
- Hegde, V. I., Aykol, M., Kirklin, S., Wolverton, C., The phase diagram of all inorganic materials. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.10869 (2018). · arXiv
- Leskovec, J., Kleinberg, J., Faloutsos, C. Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 1, 1, 1–41 (2007). https://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1217299.1217301 · DOI
- Pedarsani, P., Figueiredo, D. R. & Grossglauser, M. Densification arising from sampling fixed graphs, ACM SIGMETRICS performance. Eval. Rev. 36, 205 (2008). · DOI
- Barabási, A.-L. The scale free property. In Network Science. Ch. 4, 112–163 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016).
- Barabasi, A.-L. & Albert, R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
- Kim, S. et al. Material design of high-capacity Li-rich layered-oxide electrodes: Li2MnO3 and beyond. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 2201–2211 (2017). · DOI
- Emery, A. A., Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Hegde, V. I. & Wolverton, C. High-throughput computational screening of perovskites for thermochemical water splitting applications. Chem. Mater. 28, 5621–5634 (2016). · DOI
- Ma J., et al., Computational investigation of inverse-Heusler compounds for spintronics applications. Phys. Rev. B 98 094410 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.094410 · DOI
- Ruhnau, B. Eigenvector-centrality—a node-centrality. Soc. Netw. 22, 357–365 (2000). · DOI
- Dietterich, T. G. Machine learning for sequential data: a review. Struct., Syntactic, Stat. Pattern Recognit., Jt. IAPR Int. Workshops SSPR2002 SPR 2002 2396, 15–30 (2002).
- Weiss G. M. and Hirsh H., Learning to predict rare events in event sequences, in KDD’98 Proceedings of the Fourth InternationalConference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (AAAI Press, 1998) pp. 359–363.
- Bhardwaj, N., Gupta, A. & Uma, S. Evidence of cationic mixingand ordering in the honeycomb layer of Li4MSbO6(M(iii) = Cr, Mn, Al, Ga)(S.G. C2/c) oxides. Dalton Trans. 43, 12050–12057 (2014). · DOI
- Sathiya, M. et al. Tarascon, Li4NiTeO6 as a positive electrode for Li-ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 49, 11376–11378 (2013). · DOI
- Balachandran, P. V. et al. Predictions of new ABO3 perovskite compounds by combining machine learningand density functional theory. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 043802 (2018). · DOI
- Shukla, R., Arya, A. & Tyagi, A. K. Interconversion of perovskite and fluorite structures in Ce-Sc-O system. Inorg. Chem. 49, 1152–1157 (2010). · DOI
- Akamatsu, H. et al. Crystal and electronic structure and magnetic properties of divalent europium perovskite oxides Eu M O3(M = Ti, Zr, and Hf): experimental and first-principles approaches. Inorg. Chem. 51, 4560–4567 (2012). · DOI
- Hautier, G., Ong, S., Jain, A., Moore, C. & Ceder, G. Accuracy of density functional theory in predicting formation energies of ternary oxides frombinary oxides and its implication on phase stability. Phys. Rev. B 85, 155208 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
- Hagberg, A. A., Schult, D. A., Swart, P. J., Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using Network X. In Proc. 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy) (eds Varoquaux, G., Vaught, T., & Millman, J.) 11–15 (Pasadena, CA, 2008).
- Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R. & Newman, M. E. J. Power-Law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 51, 661–703 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
- Alstott, J., Ed Bullmore, Plenz, D., Powerlaw: a python package for analysis of heavy-tailed distributions. PLoS ONE 9 (2014), 0.1371/journal.pone.0085777. · DOI
- Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scaling deep learning for materials discovery
Merchant, A., Batzner, S., Schoenholz, S. S., Aykol, M., Cheon, G., & Cubuk, E. D. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06735-9 · Cited by 1,527
Self-citationMachine Learning for Catalysis Informatics: Recent Applications and Prospects
Toyao, T., Maeno, Z., Takakusagi, S., Kamachi, T., Takigawa, I., & Shimizu, K.-I. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b04186 · Cited by 617
Emerging materials intelligence ecosystems propelled by machine learning
Batra, R., Song, L., & Ramprasad, R. (2020) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-020-00255-y · Cited by 446
Metadata
- Authors
- Aykol, M., Hegde, V. I., Hung, L., Suram, S., Herring, P., Wolverton, C., & Hummelshøj, J. S.
- Affiliations
- Toyota Research Institute (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Aykol, Muratahan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2019-05-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2018-2018
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6494829
- OpenAlex
- W2808135796
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9
- FWCI
- 5.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DMR-1720,139, 1720139)
- Toyota Research Institute
- Materials Research Science and Engineering Center, Harvard University (1720139, DMR-1720139)
- Division of Materials Research (DMR-1720139, 1720139)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Crystal Structures and Properties
- Keywords
- synthesizability, scale-free networks, high-throughput density functional theory, machine learning prediction, materials synthesis, thermodynamic stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review