Cited by 65Cholesterol and Lipid MetabolismLipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

Structural basis for human sterol isomerase in cholesterol biosynthesis and multidrug recognition

Open access
Long, Tao, Hassan, Abdirahman, Thompson, Bonne M, McDonald, Jeffrey G, Wang, Jiawei, Li, Xiaochun·2019·Nature Communications

Abstract

3-β-hydroxysteroid-Δ 8 , Δ 7 -isomerase, known as Emopamil-Binding Protein (EBP), is an endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein involved in cholesterol biosynthesis, autophagy, oligodendrocyte formation. The mutation on EBP can cause Conradi-Hunermann syndrome, an inborn error. Interestingly, EBP binds an abundance of structurally diverse pharmacologically active compounds, causing drug resistance. Here, we report two crystal structures of human EBP, one in complex with the anti-breast cancer drug tamoxifen and the other in complex with the cholesterol biosynthesis inhibitor U18666A. EBP adopts an unreported fold involving five transmembrane-helices (TMs) that creates a membrane cavity presenting a pharmacological binding site that accommodates multiple different ligands. The compounds exploit their positively-charged amine group to mimic the carbocationic sterol intermediate. Mutagenesis studies on specific residues abolish the isomerase activity and decrease the multidrug binding capacity. This work reveals the catalytic mechanism of EBP-mediated isomerization in cholesterol biosynthesis and how this protein may act as a multi-drug binder.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Human EBP was crystallized with tamoxifen and U18666A, revealing an unreported five-transmembrane-helix fold with a membrane cavity that binds diverse drugs. The structures and mutagenesis define a putative catalytic mechanism for Δ8–Δ7 sterol isomerization and a basis for EBP-mediated multidrug recognition.

Key findings

  • Two crystal structures of human EBP were determined: U18666A-bound at 3.2 Å and tamoxifen-bound at 3.5 Å. EBP has five transmembrane helices, forms a homodimer of 65 × 30 × 55 Å with a 1460 Ų dimer interface, and a DALI search found no similar entry for the entire structure, indicating an unreported fold.
  • Both ligands bind in a membrane cavity and use a positively charged amine group to mimic the carbocationic sterol intermediate. Asn193 and Glu122 recognize the ligand amine, stabilized by a π-cation interaction with Trp196; Glu80, Glu122, and His76 form a putative catalytic triad with side-chain distances of 2.7 Å (Glu80–Glu122) and 3.2 Å (Glu80–His76).
  • Mutations His76Ala or Glu80Ala completely abolish enzymatic activity, while Glu122Ala or Trp196Ala retain much lower activity than wild-type. Ala substitutions of Trp101, Tyr104, and Tyr111 abolish over 90% of isomerase activity, and mutation of Glu122, Asn193, or Trp196 decreases ligand-binding capacity.
  • Human EBP rescues growth of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Erg2 deletion strain at 50 ng/ml cycloheximide, but growth is inhibited by U18666A or tamoxifen; both compounds compete with [³H]-ifenprodil binding to purified EBP.

Methods

  • Human EBP was expressed in HEK-293S GnTI− cells via baculovirus, purified with Strep- or His-tags in LMNG/Cymal-5, and crystallized in space group P21212 with U18666A or tamoxifen. Structures were solved by selenium-based SAD and refined at 3.2 Å and 3.5 Å.
  • Functional assays included yeast Erg2 complementation with 50 ng/ml cycloheximide ± 50 μM tamoxifen or 100 μM U18666A, SPA-based [³H]-ifenprodil binding, and in vitro LC-MS/MS enzymatic assays using zymostenol-d7.
  • Molecular docking simulations with Δ8-sterol were performed using Schrödinger modules and Glide SP scoring to model the putative catalytic mechanism.

Limitations

  • The paper states that residues 1–6, 53–59, and 220–230 were not visible in the electron density map due to flexibility and limited resolution and were excluded from the final structure.
  • The paper states that the drug scavenger activity of EBP, its energy source, and how EBP handles tamoxifen remain unclear; it notes EBP cannot directly export tamoxifen to the extracellular space and proposes redistribution or ER-lumen release models.
  • Evident from the text: the catalytic mechanism is based on molecular docking and mutagenesis rather than a substrate-bound crystal structure, and the two structures are at moderate resolution (3.2 Å and 3.5 Å).

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-10279-w

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

13 of 22 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation

    The N-terminal face of EBP is on the lumen.

    “Based on the previous immunoblotting study25 and positive inside rule26, we assigned the N-terminal face to the lumen (Fig. 2a, b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [25] Dussossoy, D. et al. Colocalization of sterol isomerase and sigma(1) receptor at endoplasmic reticulum and nuclear envelope level. Eur. J. Biochem. 263, 377–386 (1999). source
    • cites [26] von Heijne, G. Control of topology and mode of assembly of a polytopic membrane protein by positively charged residues. Nature 341, 456–458 (1989). source
  • Premisecitation

    Conversion of Δ8-sterols to Δ7-isomers occurs through uptake of solvent hydrogen from the membrane.

    “Conversion of Δ8-sterols to Δ7-isomers occurs through the uptake of solvent hydrogen from the membrane29, implying that a proton or water molecule can enter the catalytic cavity with helix H1 possibly serving as the gate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Wilton, D. C., Rahimtula, A. D. & Akhtar, M. The reversibility of the delta8-cholestenol-delta7-cholestenol isomerase reaction in cholesterol biosynthesis. Biochem. J. 114, 71–73 (1969). source

      The Results and Discussion report incorporation of hydrogen from tritiated water at C-9 of Δ7-cholestenol, consistent with a reversible Δ8-to-Δ7 isomerization. The Mechanism section proposes proton addition during that conversion, but describes the proton as coming from an enzyme group; it does not establish uptake of solvent hydrogen specifically from the membrane. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Conradi-Hunermann syndrome patients have increased amounts of 8,9-unsaturated sterols in the plasma and tissues due to mutations in the EBP gene.

    “Biochemical studies on Conradi–Hunermann syndrome patients demonstrated increased amounts of 8,9-unsaturated sterols in the plasma and tissues due to mutations in the EBP gene8,32.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [8] Braverman, N. et al. Mutations in the gene encoding 3 beta-hydroxysteroid-delta 8, delta 7-isomerase cause X-linked dominant Conradi-Hunermann syndrome. Nat. Genet. 22, 291–294 (1999). source

      The Abstract (page not provided in the index) reports increased 8(9)-cholestenol and 8-dehydrocholesterol in tissue samples from seven female probands and EBP mutations in all probands. The sterol-analysis section describes fibroblast and liver samples, but our copy does not report elevated sterols in patients’ plasma; that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [32] Kelley, R. I. et al. Abnormal sterol metabolism in patients with Conradi-Hunermann-Happle syndrome and sporadic lethal chondrodysplasia punctata. Am. J. Med. Genet. 83, 213–219 (1999). source
  • Findingown data

    EBP shares a large cavity in the transmembrane domain for ligand binding with P-glycoprotein, MRP1, and ABCG2.

    “Comparison with ligand structures of other known multidrug binding proteins (P-glycoprotein (P-gp)35, multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1)36, ABCG237 and σ1 receptor38) reveals that EBP shares a large cavity in the transmembrane domain for ligand-binding with P-gp, MRP1, and ABCG2 (Fig. 6a–c).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [35] Aller, S. G. et al. Structure of P-glycoprotein reveals a molecular basis for poly-specific drug binding. Science 323, 1718–1722 (2009). source
    • cites [36] Johnson, Z. L. & Chen, J. Structural basis of substrate recognition by the multidrug resistance protein MRP1. Cell 168, 1075–1085 e1079 (2017). source

      The supplied passages have no section or page labels and contain only reference and software URLs, not structural findings. Searches for a transmembrane ligand-binding cavity, MRP1 substrate binding, and EBP returned no substantive passage, so our copy cannot verify the comparison. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [37] Manolaridis, I. et al. Cryo-EM structures of a human ABCG2 mutant trapped in ATP-bound and substrate-bound states. Nature 563, 426–430 (2018). source
  • Premisecitation

    The σ1 receptor includes only one TM that recruits its extracellular domain to bind ligand.

    “By contrast, the σ1 receptor includes only one TM that recruits its extracellular domain to bind ligand (Fig. 6d).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] Schmidt, H. R. et al. Crystal structure of the human sigma1 receptor. Nature 532, 527–530 (2016). source

      The paper’s structure description (Abstract; page unavailable) confirms one transmembrane domain per protomer. But it places the ligand-binding β-barrel in the cytosolic domain, not an extracellular domain, and does not say the transmembrane domain recruits it to bind ligand. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 14
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 9
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premiseown data

    TM6SF2 contains two repeat units, each sharing sequence homology with EBP.

    “Notably, sequence analysis suggests that the TM6SF2 protein contains two repeat units, each of which shares sequence homology with EBP21.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Sanchez-Pulido, L. & Ponting, C. P. TM6SF2 and MAC30, new enzyme homologs in sterol metabolism and common metabolic disease. Front. Genet. 5, 439 (2014). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    A proton or water molecule can enter the EBP catalytic cavity, with helix H1 possibly serving as the gate.

    “Conversion of Δ8-sterols to Δ7-isomers occurs through the uptake of solvent hydrogen from the membrane29, implying that a proton or water molecule can enter the catalytic cavity with helix H1 possibly serving as the gate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Wilton, D. C., Rahimtula, A. D. & Akhtar, M. The reversibility of the delta8-cholestenol-delta7-cholestenol isomerase reaction in cholesterol biosynthesis. Biochem. J. 114, 71–73 (1969). source

      The Results and Discussion (page not available) report incorporation of tritium from water at C-9 of Δ7-cholestenol and explain it through reversible Δ8/Δ7 isomerization. This supports uptake of solvent hydrogen, but the paper does not establish that it comes from the membrane. Helix H1 serving as a gate is the citing authors’ inference, not a finding attributed to this source by the citation’s placement. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The σ2 receptor is highly expressed in breast, colon, and stomach cancers.

    “The structurally related σ2 receptor presents high expression levels in breast, colon and stomach cancers20 and has been reported to be a potential therapeutic target for neurocognitive disorders39.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Kayed, H. et al. Expression analysis of MAC30 in human pancreatic cancer and tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Histol. Histopathol. 19, 1021–1031 (2004). source

      The MAC30 in pancreatic diseases section (p. 1027) reports increased MAC30 mRNA in breast and colon cancers and strong MAC30 staining in stomach and colon cancer cells. Our copy does not identify MAC30 as the σ2 receptor, so it does not establish the claim about that receptor’s expression. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Model validation was performed with MolProbity.

    “Model validation was performed with MolProbity48.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    U18666A and tamoxifen inhibit the growth of yeast expressing human EBP in the complementation assay.

    “However, when we supplemented the medium with either U18666A (an inhibitor of cholesterol biosynthesis and Niemann-Pick C1 protein)23,24 or tamoxifen (Fig. 1c), growth of the yeast was inhibited (Fig. 1b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    U18666A and tamoxifen compete with [3H]-Ifenprodil binding to purified EBP in vitro.

    “Our competition binding assay shows that either U18666A or tamoxifen can compete with the [3H]-Ifenprodil binding of purified EBP in vitro12 (Fig. 1d).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Moebius, F. F. et al. Pharmacological analysis of sterol delta8-delta7 isomerase proteins with [3H]ifenprodil. Mol. Pharmacol. 54, 591–598 (1998). source
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    EBP mutants His76Ala, Glu80Ala, Glu122Ala, and Trp196Ala fail to rescue the growth of ΔErg2 Saccharomyces cerevisiae at 50 ng/ml cycloheximide.

    “Unlike wild-type EBP, mutants with His76Ala, Glu80Ala, Glu122Ala, or Trp196Ala did not survive at exposure of 50 ng/ml cycloheximide (Fig. 4b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mutation of Glu122, Asn193, or Trp196 decreases EBP ligand-binding capacity.

    “Our binding assay also shows that mutation of Glu122, Asn193 or Trp196 decreases ligand-binding capacity (Fig. 3d).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    U18666A and tamoxifen may bind the catalytic site of EBP to block enzymatic activity.

    “This observation is consistent with a previous ligand-binding study in the yeast microsome12, suggesting that these compounds may bind the catalytic site of EBP to block enzymatic activity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Moebius, F. F. et al. Pharmacological analysis of sterol delta8-delta7 isomerase proteins with [3H]ifenprodil. Mol. Pharmacol. 54, 591–598 (1998). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Mutations in the EBP dimerization interface may destabilize the protein or cause a folding defect, subsequently affecting EBP activity.

    “Mutations in the dimerization interface may destabilize the protein or cause folding defect, subsequently affecting the activity of EBP.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The intermediate would be deprotonated at C7β by Glu80, which would be stabilized by Glu122.

    “Then, this intermediate would be deprotonated at C7β by Glu80 that would be stabilized by Glu122.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    His76, Glu80, Glu122, and Asn193 may form electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonds with the amine group, enhancing binding.

    “Trp196 is capable of stabilizing the compound through a π-cation interaction, while His76, Glu80, Glu122, and Asn193 may form electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonds with the amine group, further enhancing the binding (Fig. 3a, b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    EBP might redistribute the drug to the cytosol, preventing its accumulation in the membrane.

    “EBP might redistribute the drug to the cytosol, preventing its accumulation in the membrane, or release it into the ER lumen, followed by vesicle-mediated exocytosis to the extracellular space (Fig. 6e).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    EBP might release the drug into the ER lumen, followed by vesicle-mediated exocytosis to the extracellular space.

    “EBP might redistribute the drug to the cytosol, preventing its accumulation in the membrane, or release it into the ER lumen, followed by vesicle-mediated exocytosis to the extracellular space (Fig. 6e).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The yeast complementation assay results were confirmed by three independent experiments with different colonies.

    “The results were confirmed by three independent experiments with different colonies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Enzymatic activity assays were performed with triple determinations and data are shown as mean ± SD.

    “Data shown are the mean ± SD of triple times determinations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    SPA binding experiments were performed at least three times and data are presented as mean ± s.d.

    “All experiments were performed at least three times and data are presented as mean ± s.d.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The final U18666A-bound and tamoxifen-bound EBP models had 93.07%, 6.93%, 0.0% and 91.09%, 8.74%, 0.17% in favored, allowed, and outlier regions of the Ramachandran plot, respectively.

    “The final models of U18666A-bound and tamoxifen-bound contained 93.07, 6.93 and 0.0%, and 91.09, 8.74, and 0.17% in the favored, allowed, and outlier regions of the Ramachandran plot, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Residues 1-6, 53-59, and 220-230 were not visible in the electron density map and were not included in the final EBP structures.

    “Due to the flexibility and limited resolution, the residues 1–6, 53–59 and 220–230 were not visible in the electron density map and were not included in the final structure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
19 of 19

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Long, T., Hassan, A., Thompson, B. M., McDonald, J. G., Wang, J., & Li, X.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology
Corresponding author
Li, Xiaochun
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-06-05
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
2452-2452
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2948075740
Cited by
65
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01 HL020948)
  • Welch Foundation (I-1957)
  • Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (DRR-53-19)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Keywords
emopamil binding protein, cholesterol biosynthesis, tamoxifen, U18666A, crystal structure, transmembrane helices, drug resistance, Conradi-Hünermann syndrome, catalytic mechanism, endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein
MeSH terms
Androstenes, Anticholesteremic Agents, Cholesterol, Chondrodysplasia Punctata, Estrogen Antagonists, Humans, Protein Binding, Steroid Isomerases, Tamoxifen, Mutagenesis, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review