Structural basis for human sterol isomerase in cholesterol biosynthesis and multidrug recognition
Open accessAbstract
3-β-hydroxysteroid-Δ 8 , Δ 7 -isomerase, known as Emopamil-Binding Protein (EBP), is an endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein involved in cholesterol biosynthesis, autophagy, oligodendrocyte formation. The mutation on EBP can cause Conradi-Hunermann syndrome, an inborn error. Interestingly, EBP binds an abundance of structurally diverse pharmacologically active compounds, causing drug resistance. Here, we report two crystal structures of human EBP, one in complex with the anti-breast cancer drug tamoxifen and the other in complex with the cholesterol biosynthesis inhibitor U18666A. EBP adopts an unreported fold involving five transmembrane-helices (TMs) that creates a membrane cavity presenting a pharmacological binding site that accommodates multiple different ligands. The compounds exploit their positively-charged amine group to mimic the carbocationic sterol intermediate. Mutagenesis studies on specific residues abolish the isomerase activity and decrease the multidrug binding capacity. This work reveals the catalytic mechanism of EBP-mediated isomerization in cholesterol biosynthesis and how this protein may act as a multi-drug binder.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Human EBP was crystallized with tamoxifen and U18666A, revealing an unreported five-transmembrane-helix fold with a membrane cavity that binds diverse drugs. The structures and mutagenesis define a putative catalytic mechanism for Δ8–Δ7 sterol isomerization and a basis for EBP-mediated multidrug recognition.
Key findings
- Two crystal structures of human EBP were determined: U18666A-bound at 3.2 Å and tamoxifen-bound at 3.5 Å. EBP has five transmembrane helices, forms a homodimer of 65 × 30 × 55 Å with a 1460 Ų dimer interface, and a DALI search found no similar entry for the entire structure, indicating an unreported fold.
- Both ligands bind in a membrane cavity and use a positively charged amine group to mimic the carbocationic sterol intermediate. Asn193 and Glu122 recognize the ligand amine, stabilized by a π-cation interaction with Trp196; Glu80, Glu122, and His76 form a putative catalytic triad with side-chain distances of 2.7 Å (Glu80–Glu122) and 3.2 Å (Glu80–His76).
- Mutations His76Ala or Glu80Ala completely abolish enzymatic activity, while Glu122Ala or Trp196Ala retain much lower activity than wild-type. Ala substitutions of Trp101, Tyr104, and Tyr111 abolish over 90% of isomerase activity, and mutation of Glu122, Asn193, or Trp196 decreases ligand-binding capacity.
- Human EBP rescues growth of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Erg2 deletion strain at 50 ng/ml cycloheximide, but growth is inhibited by U18666A or tamoxifen; both compounds compete with [³H]-ifenprodil binding to purified EBP.
Methods
- Human EBP was expressed in HEK-293S GnTI− cells via baculovirus, purified with Strep- or His-tags in LMNG/Cymal-5, and crystallized in space group P21212 with U18666A or tamoxifen. Structures were solved by selenium-based SAD and refined at 3.2 Å and 3.5 Å.
- Functional assays included yeast Erg2 complementation with 50 ng/ml cycloheximide ± 50 μM tamoxifen or 100 μM U18666A, SPA-based [³H]-ifenprodil binding, and in vitro LC-MS/MS enzymatic assays using zymostenol-d7.
- Molecular docking simulations with Δ8-sterol were performed using Schrödinger modules and Glide SP scoring to model the putative catalytic mechanism.
Limitations
- The paper states that residues 1–6, 53–59, and 220–230 were not visible in the electron density map due to flexibility and limited resolution and were excluded from the final structure.
- The paper states that the drug scavenger activity of EBP, its energy source, and how EBP handles tamoxifen remain unclear; it notes EBP cannot directly export tamoxifen to the extracellular space and proposes redistribution or ER-lumen release models.
- Evident from the text: the catalytic mechanism is based on molecular docking and mutagenesis rather than a substrate-bound crystal structure, and the two structures are at moderate resolution (3.2 Å and 3.5 Å).
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
13 of 22 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
The N-terminal face of EBP is on the lumen.
“Based on the previous immunoblotting study25 and positive inside rule26, we assigned the N-terminal face to the lumen (Fig. 2a, b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [25] Dussossoy, D. et al. Colocalization of sterol isomerase and sigma(1) receptor at endoplasmic reticulum and nuclear envelope level. Eur. J. Biochem. 263, 377–386 (1999). source
- cites [26] von Heijne, G. Control of topology and mode of assembly of a polytopic membrane protein by positively charged residues. Nature 341, 456–458 (1989). source
- Premisecitation
Conversion of Δ8-sterols to Δ7-isomers occurs through uptake of solvent hydrogen from the membrane.
“Conversion of Δ8-sterols to Δ7-isomers occurs through the uptake of solvent hydrogen from the membrane29, implying that a proton or water molecule can enter the catalytic cavity with helix H1 possibly serving as the gate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Wilton, D. C., Rahimtula, A. D. & Akhtar, M. The reversibility of the delta8-cholestenol-delta7-cholestenol isomerase reaction in cholesterol biosynthesis. Biochem. J. 114, 71–73 (1969). source
The Results and Discussion report incorporation of hydrogen from tritiated water at C-9 of Δ7-cholestenol, consistent with a reversible Δ8-to-Δ7 isomerization. The Mechanism section proposes proton addition during that conversion, but describes the proton as coming from an enzyme group; it does not establish uptake of solvent hydrogen specifically from the membrane. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Conradi-Hunermann syndrome patients have increased amounts of 8,9-unsaturated sterols in the plasma and tissues due to mutations in the EBP gene.
“Biochemical studies on Conradi–Hunermann syndrome patients demonstrated increased amounts of 8,9-unsaturated sterols in the plasma and tissues due to mutations in the EBP gene8,32.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] Braverman, N. et al. Mutations in the gene encoding 3 beta-hydroxysteroid-delta 8, delta 7-isomerase cause X-linked dominant Conradi-Hunermann syndrome. Nat. Genet. 22, 291–294 (1999). source
The Abstract (page not provided in the index) reports increased 8(9)-cholestenol and 8-dehydrocholesterol in tissue samples from seven female probands and EBP mutations in all probands. The sterol-analysis section describes fibroblast and liver samples, but our copy does not report elevated sterols in patients’ plasma; that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [32] Kelley, R. I. et al. Abnormal sterol metabolism in patients with Conradi-Hunermann-Happle syndrome and sporadic lethal chondrodysplasia punctata. Am. J. Med. Genet. 83, 213–219 (1999). source
- Findingown data
EBP shares a large cavity in the transmembrane domain for ligand binding with P-glycoprotein, MRP1, and ABCG2.
“Comparison with ligand structures of other known multidrug binding proteins (P-glycoprotein (P-gp)35, multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1)36, ABCG237 and σ1 receptor38) reveals that EBP shares a large cavity in the transmembrane domain for ligand-binding with P-gp, MRP1, and ABCG2 (Fig. 6a–c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [35] Aller, S. G. et al. Structure of P-glycoprotein reveals a molecular basis for poly-specific drug binding. Science 323, 1718–1722 (2009). source
- cites [36] Johnson, Z. L. & Chen, J. Structural basis of substrate recognition by the multidrug resistance protein MRP1. Cell 168, 1075–1085 e1079 (2017). source
The supplied passages have no section or page labels and contain only reference and software URLs, not structural findings. Searches for a transmembrane ligand-binding cavity, MRP1 substrate binding, and EBP returned no substantive passage, so our copy cannot verify the comparison. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [37] Manolaridis, I. et al. Cryo-EM structures of a human ABCG2 mutant trapped in ATP-bound and substrate-bound states. Nature 563, 426–430 (2018). source
- Premisecitation
The σ1 receptor includes only one TM that recruits its extracellular domain to bind ligand.
“By contrast, the σ1 receptor includes only one TM that recruits its extracellular domain to bind ligand (Fig. 6d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Schmidt, H. R. et al. Crystal structure of the human sigma1 receptor. Nature 532, 527–530 (2016). source
The paper’s structure description (Abstract; page unavailable) confirms one transmembrane domain per protomer. But it places the ligand-binding β-barrel in the cytosolic domain, not an extracellular domain, and does not say the transmembrane domain recruits it to bind ligand. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Blocking EBP activity contributes to the death of tumor cells.
“Blocking EBP activity has been shown to contribute to the death of tumor cells9,10,17,18.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [9] de Medina, P. et al. Ligands of the antiestrogen-binding site induce active cell death and autophagy in human breast cancer cells through the modulation of cholesterol metabolism. Cell Death Differ. 16, 1372–1384 (2009). source
- cites [10] Segala, G. et al. Dendrogenin A drives LXR to trigger lethal autophagy in cancers. Nat. Commun. 8, 1903 (2017). source
- cites [17] de Medina, P., Silvente-Poirot, S. & Poirot, M. Tamoxifen and AEBS ligands induced apoptosis and autophagy in breast cancer cells through the stimulation of sterol accumulation. Autophagy 5, 1066–1067 (2009). source
The section “AEBS Ligands Induce Apoptosis through the Accumulation of Sterols and Oxysterols” reports that AEBS ligands induce apoptosis in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Our copy does not identify EBP or establish that blocking EBP activity specifically contributes to that death; it attributes the observed death to sterol accumulation and oxidation following treatment with AEBS ligands. Page numbers are unavailable in the indexed copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Human EBP functions as a sterol isomerase in a yeast complementation system.
“The expression of human EBP, but not the vector alone, allowed the yeast to survive under exposure to 50 ng/ml cycloheximide, suggesting that human EBP functions as a sterol isomerase in this system (Fig. 1b).”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“EBP can rescue the growth of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae sterol isomerase Erg2 (yeast EBP homologue) deletion strain (ΔErg2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Findingown data
Human EBP adopts an unreported fold involving five transmembrane helices (TMs 1-5).
“EBP adopts an unreported fold involving five transmembrane-helices (TMs) that creates a membrane cavity presenting a pharmacological binding site that accommodates multiple different ligands.”
- Also stated in: § The overall structure · plain
“This protein contains five transmembrane helices (TMs 1–5) (Fig. 2a–e).”
- Also stated in: § The overall structure · hedged
“A DALI search for structural homologues failed to identify a similar entry for the entire structure, implying that EBP presents an unreported fold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § The overall structure · plain
- Findingown data
The five-TM fold of EBP creates a membrane cavity that presents a pharmacological binding site accommodating multiple different ligands.
“EBP adopts an unreported fold involving five transmembrane-helices (TMs) that creates a membrane cavity presenting a pharmacological binding site that accommodates multiple different ligands.”
- Also stated in: § The membrane cavity and the putative catalytic mechanism · hedged
“Structural analysis indicates that the cavity is created by the TMs that provide the hydrophobic environment to host the compound (Fig. 3c).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“The binding pocket in EBP consists of several conserved aromatic residues that provide a hydrophobic environment directly facing the membrane, allowing the cavity to host diversely structured ligands (Fig. 3c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § The membrane cavity and the putative catalytic mechanism · hedged
- Findingown data
Mutations in the EBP dimer interface slow the growth of ΔErg2 Saccharomyces cerevisiae at 50 ng/ml cycloheximide.
“Mutations in the dimer interface lead to slower growth of the ΔErg2 Saccharomyces cerevisiae at exposure of 50 ng/ml cycloheximide (Supplementary Fig. 7b, c), implying that the dimerization may play a role in fully activating EBP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
H1 residues facing the cavity are hydrophobic and aromatic.
“The residues of H1, which face the cavity, are hydrophobic and aromatic (Fig. 3a, b and Supplementary Fig. 8), while the residues facing the lumen are hydrophilic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
EBP has a membrane horizontal helix (H1) between TM2 and TM3 that blocks a hydrophobic cavity created by residues of TMs 2-5.
“A linker between TM2 and TM3 forms a membrane horizontal helix (H1) that blocks a hydrophobic cavity created by the residues of TMs 2–5 (Fig. 2a–d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The EBP dimer interface, including TMs 3-5 of each monomer, has an area of 1460 Å2.
“The area of the dimer interface including TMs 3–5 of each monomer is 1460 Å2 (Fig. 2a–d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The U18666A-bound and tamoxifen-bound EBP structures have a similar conformation.
“Comparison between U18666A-bound and tamoxifen-bound structures revealed a similar conformation (Supplementary Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
H1 residues facing the lumen are hydrophilic.
“The residues of H1, which face the cavity, are hydrophobic and aromatic (Fig. 3a, b and Supplementary Fig. 8), while the residues facing the lumen are hydrophilic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
EBP forms a homodimer.
“EBP forms a homodimer in the crystal, as reported in previous solution studies27, with dimensions of 65 × 30 × 55 Å.”
- Also stated in: § The overall structure · hedged
“Western blot showed that His-EBP can be pulled-down by Strep-Tactin sepharose (Supplementary Fig. 7a), implying that EBP can form a dimer as shown by our structural observation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Moebius, F. F. et al. Purification and amino-terminal sequencing of the high affinity phenylalkylamine Ca2+ antagonist binding protein from guinea pig liver endoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29314–29320 (1994). source
- Also stated in: § The overall structure · hedged
- Findingown data
The side-chain distances between Glu80 and Glu122 (2.7 Å) and between Glu80 and His76 (3.2 Å) allow a proton to transfer through a hydrogen-bonding network as a catalytic triad.
“The 2.7 Å distance between the side chains of Glu80 and Glu122 and the 3.2 Å distance between the side chains of Glu80 and His76 allow a proton to transfer through the hydrogen-bonding network as a catalytic triad.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
EBP mutants His76Ala and Glu80Ala completely lose enzymatic activity.
“The results show that mutants with His76Ala or Glu80Ala completely lose the enzymatic activity, while mutants with Glu122Ala or Trp196Ala retain a much lower activity than the wild-type protein (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Trp196 stabilizes EBP ligands through a π-cation interaction.
“Trp196 is capable of stabilizing the compound through a π-cation interaction, while His76, Glu80, Glu122, and Asn193 may form electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonds with the amine group, further enhancing the binding (Fig. 3a, b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Asn193 and Glu122 recognize the amine group of the ligand.
“Asn193 and Glu122 recognize the amine group of the ligand, which is stabilized through a π-cation interaction with Trp196 (Fig. 3a, b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ligand amine group is stabilized through a π-cation interaction with Trp196.
“Asn193 and Glu122 recognize the amine group of the ligand, which is stabilized through a π-cation interaction with Trp196 (Fig. 3a, b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Five Conradi-Hunermann syndrome mutations (L18P, E103K, A105D, G107E, R110Q) are found in H1 and the luminal domain.
“Five mutations are found in H1 and the luminal domain, including L18P, E103K, A105D, G107E, R110Q.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
EBP mutants Glu122Ala and Trp196Ala retain much lower enzymatic activity than wild-type EBP.
“The results show that mutants with His76Ala or Glu80Ala completely lose the enzymatic activity, while mutants with Glu122Ala or Trp196Ala retain a much lower activity than the wild-type protein (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
U18666A and tamoxifen bind to EBP in the same manner.
“We also showed that U18666A and tamoxifen bind to EBP in the same manner, implying the binding mode of EBP ligands (Fig. 3a, b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The EBP membrane cavity contains four polar residues.
“There are four polar residues in this cavity suggesting a special role.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Ala substitutions of Trp101, Tyr104, and Tyr111 abolish over 90% of EBP isomerase activity.
“Importantly, Ala substitutions of Trp101, Tyr104 and Tyr111, which face the hydrophobic cavity, abolish over 90% of the isomerase activity by gas chromatography analysis28.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Moebius, F. F. et al. Histidine77, glutamic acid81, glutamic acid123, threonine126, asparagine194, and tryptophan197 of the human emopamil binding protein are required for in vivo sterol delta 8-delta 7 isomerization. Biochemistry 38, 1119–1127 (1999). source
- Study design and conductown data
The ligand (U18666A or tamoxifen) was determined unambiguously in the density map.
“In the density map, the ligand (U18666A or tamoxifen) was determined unambiguously (Fig. 2f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Dimerization may play a role in fully activating EBP.
“Mutations in the dimer interface lead to slower growth of the ΔErg2 Saccharomyces cerevisiae at exposure of 50 ng/ml cycloheximide (Supplementary Fig. 7b, c), implying that the dimerization may play a role in fully activating EBP.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The resulting carbocationic sterol intermediate would be stabilized by Trp196 through a π-cation interaction.
“The resulting carbocationic sterol intermediate would be stabilized by Trp196 through a π-cation interaction (Fig. 4a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Helix H1 can allow a proton or water molecule to access the EBP cavity from the ER lumen.
“Helix H1 can allow a proton or water molecule to access the cavity from the ER lumen.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The produced Δ7-isomers would be released into the membrane from the membrane gate between TM1 and TM5.
“The produced Δ7-isomers would be released into the membrane from the membrane gate between TM1 and TM5 (Fig. 3c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
His76 may act as a proton donor, protonating Δ8-sterol at C9α and generating a carbocation at C8.
“His76 may play the role of a proton donor residue, protonating Δ8-sterol at C9α with the subsequent generation of a carbonium ion at C8.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
These enzymatic activity results are consistent with previous gas chromatography analysis showing that EBP variants with any of these mutations essentially affected its isomerase activity.
“These results are consistent with the previous gas chromatography analysis, which demonstrated that EBP variants with any of these mutations essentially affected its isomerase activity28.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Moebius, F. F. et al. Histidine77, glutamic acid81, glutamic acid123, threonine126, asparagine194, and tryptophan197 of the human emopamil binding protein are required for in vivo sterol delta 8-delta 7 isomerization. Biochemistry 38, 1119–1127 (1999). source
- Interpretationreasoning
The proton would be returned to His76 through the hydrogen-bonding network.
“After this reaction, the proton would be returned to His76 through the hydrogen-bonding network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
EBP's putative catalytic mechanism is analogous to the enzymatic action of ketosteroid isomerases, in which acidic residues act as a proton donor or acceptor.
“This putative mechanism is analogous to the enzymatic action of ketosteroid isomerases, for which acidic residues act as a proton donor or acceptor31, although the ketosteroid isomerase catalyzes the reaction in an aqueous environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Pollack, R. M. Enzymatic mechanisms for catalysis of enolization: ketosteroid isomerase. Bioorg. Chem. 32, 341–353 (2004). source
- Interpretationreasoning
These five mutations may block solvent entry.
“These mutations may block the solvent entry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The hydrophobicity of EBP-binding compounds enables them to partition into the membrane.
“Besides the amine group, the hydrophobicity of compounds enables them to partition into the membrane.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Compounds that bind to EBP have a positively-charged amine group, mimicking the carbocationic reaction sterol intermediate.
“The compounds that bind to EBP have a positively-charged amine group (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 2), mimicking the carbocationic reaction sterol intermediate (Fig. 4a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Disease-related mutations localized to the EBP membrane cavity may affect sterol binding/entry and catalytic reaction.
“Mutations, which are localized to the membrane cavity, may affect sterol binding/entry and catalytic reaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Glu80, Glu122, and His76 are likely involved in the catalytic mechanism of EBP during cholesterol biosynthesis.
“As these three residues have a 3.5–5 Å distance to the compound, they are likely involved in the catalytic mechanism of EBP during cholesterol biosynthesis (Fig. 4a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
EBP in the ER is not able to directly export tamoxifen to the extracellular space.
“It is clear that EBP in the ER is not able to directly export tamoxifen to the extracellular space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 14
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 9
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Premiseown dataTM6SF2 contains two repeat units, each sharing sequence homology with EBP.
“Notably, sequence analysis suggests that the TM6SF2 protein contains two repeat units, each of which shares sequence homology with EBP21.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Sanchez-Pulido, L. & Ponting, C. P. TM6SF2 and MAC30, new enzyme homologs in sterol metabolism and common metabolic disease. Front. Genet. 5, 439 (2014). source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationA proton or water molecule can enter the EBP catalytic cavity, with helix H1 possibly serving as the gate.
“Conversion of Δ8-sterols to Δ7-isomers occurs through the uptake of solvent hydrogen from the membrane29, implying that a proton or water molecule can enter the catalytic cavity with helix H1 possibly serving as the gate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Wilton, D. C., Rahimtula, A. D. & Akhtar, M. The reversibility of the delta8-cholestenol-delta7-cholestenol isomerase reaction in cholesterol biosynthesis. Biochem. J. 114, 71–73 (1969). source
The Results and Discussion (page not available) report incorporation of tritium from water at C-9 of Δ7-cholestenol and explain it through reversible Δ8/Δ7 isomerization. This supports uptake of solvent hydrogen, but the paper does not establish that it comes from the membrane. Helix H1 serving as a gate is the citing authors’ inference, not a finding attributed to this source by the citation’s placement. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe σ2 receptor is highly expressed in breast, colon, and stomach cancers.
“The structurally related σ2 receptor presents high expression levels in breast, colon and stomach cancers20 and has been reported to be a potential therapeutic target for neurocognitive disorders39.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Kayed, H. et al. Expression analysis of MAC30 in human pancreatic cancer and tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Histol. Histopathol. 19, 1021–1031 (2004). source
The MAC30 in pancreatic diseases section (p. 1027) reports increased MAC30 mRNA in breast and colon cancers and strong MAC30 staining in stomach and colon cancer cells. Our copy does not identify MAC30 as the σ2 receptor, so it does not establish the claim about that receptor’s expression. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationModel validation was performed with MolProbity.
“Model validation was performed with MolProbity48.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataU18666A and tamoxifen inhibit the growth of yeast expressing human EBP in the complementation assay.
“However, when we supplemented the medium with either U18666A (an inhibitor of cholesterol biosynthesis and Niemann-Pick C1 protein)23,24 or tamoxifen (Fig. 1c), growth of the yeast was inhibited (Fig. 1b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataU18666A and tamoxifen compete with [3H]-Ifenprodil binding to purified EBP in vitro.
“Our competition binding assay shows that either U18666A or tamoxifen can compete with the [3H]-Ifenprodil binding of purified EBP in vitro12 (Fig. 1d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Moebius, F. F. et al. Pharmacological analysis of sterol delta8-delta7 isomerase proteins with [3H]ifenprodil. Mol. Pharmacol. 54, 591–598 (1998). source
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataEBP mutants His76Ala, Glu80Ala, Glu122Ala, and Trp196Ala fail to rescue the growth of ΔErg2 Saccharomyces cerevisiae at 50 ng/ml cycloheximide.
“Unlike wild-type EBP, mutants with His76Ala, Glu80Ala, Glu122Ala, or Trp196Ala did not survive at exposure of 50 ng/ml cycloheximide (Fig. 4b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMutation of Glu122, Asn193, or Trp196 decreases EBP ligand-binding capacity.
“Our binding assay also shows that mutation of Glu122, Asn193 or Trp196 decreases ligand-binding capacity (Fig. 3d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationU18666A and tamoxifen may bind the catalytic site of EBP to block enzymatic activity.
“This observation is consistent with a previous ligand-binding study in the yeast microsome12, suggesting that these compounds may bind the catalytic site of EBP to block enzymatic activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Moebius, F. F. et al. Pharmacological analysis of sterol delta8-delta7 isomerase proteins with [3H]ifenprodil. Mol. Pharmacol. 54, 591–598 (1998). source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMutations in the EBP dimerization interface may destabilize the protein or cause a folding defect, subsequently affecting EBP activity.
“Mutations in the dimerization interface may destabilize the protein or cause folding defect, subsequently affecting the activity of EBP.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe intermediate would be deprotonated at C7β by Glu80, which would be stabilized by Glu122.
“Then, this intermediate would be deprotonated at C7β by Glu80 that would be stabilized by Glu122.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHis76, Glu80, Glu122, and Asn193 may form electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonds with the amine group, enhancing binding.
“Trp196 is capable of stabilizing the compound through a π-cation interaction, while His76, Glu80, Glu122, and Asn193 may form electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonds with the amine group, further enhancing the binding (Fig. 3a, b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningEBP might redistribute the drug to the cytosol, preventing its accumulation in the membrane.
“EBP might redistribute the drug to the cytosol, preventing its accumulation in the membrane, or release it into the ER lumen, followed by vesicle-mediated exocytosis to the extracellular space (Fig. 6e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEBP might release the drug into the ER lumen, followed by vesicle-mediated exocytosis to the extracellular space.
“EBP might redistribute the drug to the cytosol, preventing its accumulation in the membrane, or release it into the ER lumen, followed by vesicle-mediated exocytosis to the extracellular space (Fig. 6e).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe yeast complementation assay results were confirmed by three independent experiments with different colonies.
“The results were confirmed by three independent experiments with different colonies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataEnzymatic activity assays were performed with triple determinations and data are shown as mean ± SD.
“Data shown are the mean ± SD of triple times determinations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSPA binding experiments were performed at least three times and data are presented as mean ± s.d.
“All experiments were performed at least three times and data are presented as mean ± s.d.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe final U18666A-bound and tamoxifen-bound EBP models had 93.07%, 6.93%, 0.0% and 91.09%, 8.74%, 0.17% in favored, allowed, and outlier regions of the Ramachandran plot, respectively.
“The final models of U18666A-bound and tamoxifen-bound contained 93.07, 6.93 and 0.0%, and 91.09, 8.74, and 0.17% in the favored, allowed, and outlier regions of the Ramachandran plot, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataResidues 1-6, 53-59, and 220-230 were not visible in the electron density map and were not included in the final EBP structures.
“Due to the flexibility and limited resolution, the residues 1–6, 53–59 and 220–230 were not visible in the electron density map and were not included in the final structure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
Cites
[20] Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode
Otwinowski, Z., & Minor, W. (1997) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(97)76066-x · Cited by 33,475 · see citing works
<i>Coot</i> : model-building tools for molecular graphics
Emsley, P., & Cowtan, K. (2004) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444904019158 · Cited by 30,571 · see citing works
<i>PHENIX</i> : a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution
Adams, P. D., Afonine, P. V., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Davis, I. W., Echols, N., Headd, J. J., Hung, L.-W., Kapral, G. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., et al. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444909052925 · Cited by 23,716 · see citing works
<i>Phaser</i> crystallographic software
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C., & Read, R. J. (2007) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889807021206 · Cited by 20,612 · see citing works
<i>MolProbity</i> : all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography
Chen, V. B., Arendall, W. B., Headd, J. J., Keedy, D. A., Immormino, R. M., Kapral, G. J., Murray, L. W., Richardson, J. S., & Richardson, D. C. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444909042073 · Cited by 14,115 · see citing works
PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution
Adams, P. D., Afonine, P. V., Bunkòczi, G., Chen, V. B., Davis, I., Echols, N., Headd, J. J., Hung, L., Kapral, G. J., Grosse‐Kunstleve, R. W., et al. (2012) · International Tables for Crystallography · doi:10.1107/97809553602060000865 · Cited by 7,334 · see citing works
Automated MAD and MIR structure solution
Terwilliger, T. C., & Berendzen, J. (1999) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444999000839 · Cited by 3,038 · see citing works
Structure of P-Glycoprotein Reveals a Molecular Basis for Poly-Specific Drug Binding
Aller, S. G., Yu, J., Ward, A., Weng, Y., Chittaboina, S., Zhuo, R., Harrell, P. M., Trinh, Y. T., Zhang, Q., Urbatsch, I. L., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1168750 · Cited by 1,929 · see citing works
Substructure solution withSHELXD
Schneider, T. R., & Sheldrick, G. M. (2002) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444902011678 · Cited by 1,591 · see citing works
Kozlitina, J., Smagris, E., Stender, S., Nordestgaard, B. G., Zhou, H. H., Tybjærg-Hansen, A., Vogt, T. F., Hobbs, H. H., & Cohen, J. C. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2901 · Cited by 1,234 · see citing works
The pharmacology of sigma-1 receptors.
Maurice, T., & Su, T.-P. (2009) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.07.001 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Biosynthesis of Cholesterol and Other Sterols
Nes, W. D. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200021m · Cited by 635 · see citing works
vonHeijne, G. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/341456a0 · Cited by 591 · see citing works
Crystal structure of the human σ1 receptor
Schmidt, H. R., Zheng, S., Gurpinar, E., Koehl, A., Manglik, A., & Kruse, A. C. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17391 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Malformation syndromes caused by disorders of cholesterol synthesis
Porter, F. D., & Herman, G. E. (2011) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.r009548 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Structural Basis of Substrate Recognition by the Multidrug Resistance Protein MRP1
Johnson, Z. L., & Chen, J. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.041 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Lu, F., Liang, Q., Abi-Mosleh, L., Das, A., De Brabander, J. K., Goldstein, J. L., & Brown, M. S. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.12177 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Braverman, N., Lin, P., Moebius, F. F., Obie, C., Moser, A., Glossmann, H., Wilcox, W. R., Rimoin, D. L., Smith, M., Kratz, L., et al. (1999) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/10357 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
McDonald, J. G., Smith, D. D., Stiles, A. R., & Russell, D. W. (2012) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.d022285 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Self-citationCrystal structure of the epithelial calcium channel TRPV6
Saotome, K., Singh, A. K., Yelshanskaya, M. V., & Sobolevsky, A. I. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17975 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Cryo-EM structures of a human ABCG2 mutant trapped in ATP-bound and substrate-bound states
Manolaridis, I., Jackson, S. M., Taylor, N. M. I., Kowal, J., Stahlberg, H., & Locher, K. P. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0680-3 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Accumulation of 8,9-unsaturated sterols drives oligodendrocyte formation and remyelination
Hubler, Z., Allimuthu, D., Bederman, I., Elitt, M. S., Madhavan, M., Allan, K. C., Shick, H. E., Garrison, E., T. Karl, M., Factor, D. C., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0360-3 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Mitsche, M. A., McDonald, J. G., Hobbs, H. H., & Cohen, J. C. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.07999 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Self-citationDHCR7: A vital enzyme switch between cholesterol and vitamin D production
Prabhu, A. V., Luu, W., Li, D., Sharpe, L. J., & Brown, A. J. (2016) · Progress in Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2016.09.003 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Structure of human Niemann–Pick C1 protein
Li, X., Wang, J., Coutavas, E. E., Shi, H., Hao, Q., & Blobel, G. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1607795113 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Self-citationCryo-EM structure of the ABCG2 E211Q mutant bound to estrone 3-sulfate and 5D3-Fab
Manolaridis, I., Jackson, S. M., Taylor, N. M. I., Kowal, J., Stahlberg, H., & Locher, K. P. (2018) · Worldwide Protein Data Bank · doi:10.2210/pdb6hco/pdb · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Dendrogenin A drives LXR to trigger lethal autophagy in cancers
Segala, G., David, M., de Medina, P., Poirot, M. C., Serhan, N., Vergez, F., Mougel, A., Saland, E., Carayon, K., Leignadier, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01948-9 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Yi, B., Sahn, J. J., Ardestani, P. M., Evans, A. K., Scott, L. L., Chan, J. Z., Iyer, S. V., Crisp, A., Zuniga, G., Pierce-Shimomura, J. T., et al. (2016) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.13917 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Laggner, C., Schieferer, C., Fiechtner, B., Poles, G., Hoffmann, R. D., Glossmann, H. H., Langer, T., & Moebius, F. F. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm049073+ · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Enzymatic mechanisms for catalysis of enolization: ketosteroid isomerase
Pollack, R. M. (2004) · Bioorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2004.06.005 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
de Medina, P., Silvente-Poirot, S., & Poirot, M. (2009) · Autophagy · doi:10.4161/auto.5.7.9820 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Selective targeting of mutant adenomatous polyposis coli ( <i>APC</i> ) in colorectal cancer
Zhang, L., Theodoropoulos, P. C., Eskiocak, U., Wang, W., Moon, Y.-A., Posner, B., Williams, N. S., Wright, W. E., Kim, S. B., Nijhawan, D., et al. (2016) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf8127 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
de Medina, P., Payré, B., Boubekeur, N., Bertrand-Michel, J., Tercé, F., Silvente-Poirot, S., & Poirot, M. (2009) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/cdd.2009.62 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Pharmacological Analysis of Sterol Δ8-Δ7 Isomerase Proteins with [3H]Ifenprodil
Moebius, F. F., Reiter, R. J., Bermoser, K., Glossmann, H., Cho, S. Y., & Paik, Y.-K. (1998) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.54.3.591 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Cloning and disruption of the yeast C‐8 sterol isomerase gene
Ashman, W. H., Barbuch, R. J., Ulbright, C. E., Jarrett, H. W., & Bard, M. (1991) · Lipids · doi:10.1007/bf02536427 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Structure of an integral membrane sterol reductase from Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum
Li, X., Roberti, R., & Blobel, G. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13797 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationTM6SF2 and MAC30, new enzyme homologs in sterol metabolism and common metabolic disease
Sanchez-Pulido, L., & Ponting, C. P. (2014) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2014.00439 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Dussossoy, D., Carayon, P., Belugou, S., Feraut, D., Bord, A., Goubet, C., Roque, C., Vidal, H., Combes, T., Loison, G., et al. (1999) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00500.x · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Hargrove, T. Y., Friggeri, L., Wawrzak, Z., Sivakumaran, S., Yazlovitskaya, E. M., Hiebert, S. W., Guengerich, F. P., Waterman, M. R., & Lepesheva, G. I. (2016) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.m069229 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Pavlik, E. J., Nelson, K., Srinivasan, S., et al. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Paik, Y., Billheimer, J. T., Magolda, R. L., & Gaylor, J. L. (1986) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)84586-6 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Cañueto, J., Girós, M., Ciria, S., et al. (2011) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10756.x · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Leignadier, J., Dalenc, F., Poirot, M., & Silvente‐Poirot, S. (2017) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2017.06.120 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Expression analysis of MAC30 in human pancreatic cancer and tumors of the gastrointestinal tract.
(2004) · PubMed · doi:10.14670/hh-19.1021 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Highly efficient selenomethionine labeling of recombinant proteins produced in mammalian cells
Barton, W. A., Tzvetkova‐Robev, D., Erdjument‐Bromage, H., et al. (2006) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.062244206 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Moebius, F. F., Hanner, M., Knaus, H. G., Weber, F., Striessnig, J., & Glossmann, H. (1994) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)62046-6 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Moebius, F. F., Soellner, K. E. M., Fiechtner, B., Huck, C. W., Bonn, G., & Glossmann, H. (1999) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi981804i · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Wilton, D. C., Rahimtula, A. D., & Akhtar, M. (1969) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj1140071 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Purification, characterization and catalytic properties of human sterol 8-isomerase
Nes, W. D., Zhou, W., Dennis, A. L., Li, H., Jia, Z., Keith, R. A., Piser, T. M., & Furlong, S. T. (2002) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20020551 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Rahier, A., Pierre, S., Riveill, G., & Karst, F. (2008) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20080292 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Structures of the σ2 receptor enable docking for bioactive ligand discovery
Alon, A., Lyu, J., Braz, J. M., Tummino, T. A., Craik, V., O’Meara, M. J., Webb, C. M., Radchenko, D. S., Moroz, Y. S., Huang, X.-P., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04175-x · Cited by 211 · see citing works
- Authors
- Long, T., Hassan, A., Thompson, B. M., McDonald, J. G., Wang, J., & Li, X.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology
- Corresponding author
- Li, Xiaochun
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2019-06-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2452-2452
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6549186
- OpenAlex
- W2948075740
- Semantic Scholar
- c37052b454ff3462e671c4734a5739a82fc560db
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01 HL020948)
- Welch Foundation (I-1957)
- Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (DRR-53-19)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
- Keywords
- emopamil binding protein, cholesterol biosynthesis, tamoxifen, U18666A, crystal structure, transmembrane helices, drug resistance, Conradi-Hünermann syndrome, catalytic mechanism, endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein
- MeSH terms
- Androstenes, Anticholesteremic Agents, Cholesterol, Chondrodysplasia Punctata, Estrogen Antagonists, Humans, Protein Binding, Steroid Isomerases, Tamoxifen, Mutagenesis, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Molecular Docking Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review