Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A consensus S. cerevisiae metabolic model Yeast8 and its ecosystem for comprehensively probing cellular metabolism

Open access
Lu, Hongzhong, Li, Feiran, Sánchez, Benjamín J., Zhu, Zhengming, Li, Gang, Domenzain, Iván, Marcišauskas, Simonas, Anton, Petre Mihail, Lappa, Dimitra, Lieven, Christian, Beber, Moritz Emanuel, Sonnenschein, Nikolaus, Kerkhoven, Eduard J., Nielsen, Jens·2019·Nature Communications

Abstract

Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) represent extensive knowledgebases that provide a platform for model simulations and integrative analysis of omics data. This study introduces Yeast8 and an associated ecosystem of models that represent a comprehensive computational resource for performing simulations of the metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae––an important model organism and widely used cell-factory. Yeast8 tracks community development with version control, setting a standard for how GEMs can be continuously updated in a simple and reproducible way. We use Yeast8 to develop the derived models panYeast8 and coreYeast8, which in turn enable the reconstruction of GEMs for 1,011 different yeast strains. Through integration with enzyme constraints (ecYeast8) and protein 3D structures (proYeast8 DB), Yeast8 further facilitates the exploration of yeast metabolism at a multi-scale level, enabling prediction of how single nucleotide variations translate to phenotypic traits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-11581-3

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 83 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Robinson, J. L. & Nielsen, J. Anticancer drug discovery through genome-scale metabolic modeling. Current Opinion in. Syst. Biol. 4, 1–8 (2017).

Cited by

See all 361

Metadata

Authors
Lu, H., Li, F., Sánchez, B. J., Zhu, Z., Li, G., Domenzain, I., Marcišauskas, S., Anton, P. M., Lappa, D., Lieven, C., Beber, M. E., Sonnenschein, N., Kerkhoven, E. J., & Nielsen, J.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-08-08
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
3586-3586
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2965590414
Cited by
361
References
83
FWCI
10.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
Funders
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF10CC1016517)
  • EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (686070, 720824)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A consensus S. cerevisiae metabolic model Yeast8 and its ecosystem for comprehensively probing cellular metabolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-019-11581-3
The paper
Lu, H., Li, F., Sánchez, B. J., Zhu, Z., Li, G., Domenzain, I., Marcišauskas, S., Anton, P. M., Lappa, D., Lieven, C., Beber, M. E., Sonnenschein, N., Kerkhoven, E. J., & Nielsen, J. (2019). A consensus S. cerevisiae metabolic model Yeast8 and its ecosystem for comprehensively probing cellular metabolism. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11581-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.