Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Non-invasive in vivo hyperspectral imaging of the retina for potential biomarker use in Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Hadoux, Xavier, Hui, Flora, Lim, Jeremiah K. H., Masters, Colin L., Pébay, Alice, Chevalier, Sophie, Ha, Jason, Loi, Samantha, Fowler, Christopher J., Rowe, Christopher, Villemagne, Victor L., Taylor, Edward N., Fluke, Christopher, Soucy, Jean-Paul, Lesage, Frédéric, Sylvestre, Jean-Philippe, Rosa-Neto, Pedro, Mathotaarachchi, Sulantha, Gauthier, Serge, Nasreddine, Ziad S., Arbour, Jean Daniel, Rhéaume, Marc-André, Beaulieu, Sylvain, Dirani, Mohamed, Nguyen, Christine T. O., Bui, Bang V., Williamson, Robert, Crowston, Jonathan G., van Wijngaarden, Peter·2019·Nature Communications

Abstract

Studies of rodent models of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and of human tissues suggest that the retinal changes that occur in AD, including the accumulation of amyloid beta (Aβ), may serve as surrogate markers of brain Aβ levels. As Aβ has a wavelength-dependent effect on light scatter, we investigate the potential for in vivo retinal hyperspectral imaging to serve as a biomarker of brain Aβ. Significant differences in the retinal reflectance spectra are found between individuals with high Aβ burden on brain PET imaging and mild cognitive impairment (n = 15), and age-matched PET-negative controls (n = 20). Retinal imaging scores are correlated with brain Aβ loads. The findings are validated in an independent cohort, using a second hyperspectral camera. A similar spectral difference is found between control and 5xFAD transgenic mice that accumulate Aβ in the brain and retina. These findings indicate that retinal hyperspectral imaging may predict brain Aβ load.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-12242-1

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Hadoux, X., Hui, F., Lim, J. K. H., Masters, C. L., Pébay, A., Chevalier, S., Ha, J., Loi, S., Fowler, C. J., Rowe, C., Villemagne, V. L., Taylor, E. N., Fluke, C., Soucy, J.-P., Lesage, F., Sylvestre, J.-P., Rosa-Neto, P., Mathotaarachchi, S., Gauthier, S., Nasreddine, Z. S., Arbour, J. D., Rhéaume, M.-A., Beaulieu, S., Dirani, M., Nguyen, C. T. O., Bui, B. V., Williamson, R., Crowston, J. G., & van Wijngaarden, P.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-09-17
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
4227-4227
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2973454555
Cited by
304
References
51
FWCI
20.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non-invasive in vivo hyperspectral imaging of the retina for potential biomarker use in Alzheimer’s disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-019-12242-1
The paper
Hadoux, X., Hui, F., Lim, J. K. H., Masters, C. L., Pébay, A., Chevalier, S., Ha, J., Loi, S., Fowler, C. J., Rowe, C., Villemagne, V. L., Taylor, E. N., Fluke, C., Soucy, J.-P., Lesage, F., Sylvestre, J.-P., Rosa-Neto, P., Mathotaarachchi, S., Gauthier, S., . . . van Wijngaarden, P. (2019). Non-invasive in vivo hyperspectral imaging of the retina for potential biomarker use in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12242-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.