Cited by 22Glaucoma and retinal disordersTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceDrug-Induced Ocular Toxicity

Evaluating the neuroprotective impact of senolytic drugs on human vision

Open access
El-Nimri, Nevin W., Moore, Spencer M., Zangwill, Linda M., Proudfoot, James A., Weinreb, Robert N., Skowronska-Krawczyk, Dorota, Baxter, Sally L.·2020·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Glaucoma, a chronic neurodegenerative disease of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. Its management currently focuses on lowering intraocular pressure to slow disease progression. However, disease-modifying, neuroprotective treatments for glaucoma remain a major unmet need. Recently, senescent cells have been observed in glaucomatous eyes, exposing a potential pathway for alternative glaucoma therapies. Prior studies demonstrated that targeting senescent RGCs for removal (i.e., a senolytic approach) protected healthy RGCs and preserved visual function in a mouse ocular hypertension model. However, the effects of senolytic drugs on vision in human patients are unknown. Here, we used existing clinical data to conduct a retrospective cohort study in 28 human glaucoma patients who had been exposed to senolytics. Senolytic exposure was not associated with decreased visual acuity, elevated intraocular pressure, or documentation of senolytic-related adverse ocular effects by treating ophthalmologists. Additionally, patients exposed to senolytics (n = 9) did not exhibit faster progression of glaucomatous visual field damage compared to matched glaucoma patients (n = 26) without senolytic exposure. These results suggest that senolytic drugs do not carry significant ocular toxicity and provide further support for additional evaluation of the potential neuroprotective effects of senolytics on glaucoma and other neurodegenerative diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-78802-4

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a retrospective study of 28 patients with glaucoma, senolytic exposure did not affect visual acuity or intraocular pressure, and did not have toxic effects.

    “Although a study in a mouse model showed that dasatinib prevented glaucoma-dependent loss of retinal functions and cellular structure, 41 a retrospective study assessing the effects of senolytic drugs on vision in 28 patients with glaucoma showed that senolytic exposure did not affect visual acuity or intraocular pressure, and did not have toxic effects.74”

    From The costs and benefits of senotherapeutics for human health (2022) · cites this paper as [74]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [31]Rothman KJ Greenland S Lash TL Modern Epidemiology 2008 3 Philadelphia Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El-Nimri, N. W., Moore, S. M., Zangwill, L. M., Proudfoot, J. A., Weinreb, R. N., Skowronska-Krawczyk, D., & Baxter, S. L.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Baxter, Sally L.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-12-10
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
21752-21752
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3111262807
Cited by
22
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P30EY022589, EY027011, T15LM011271)
  • RBP award
  • Glaucoma Research Foundation Shaffer Award
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
Keywords
senolytics, glaucoma, retinal ganglion cells, neuroprotection, senescent cells, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, visual field damage, ocular toxicity, disease-modifying therapy, neurodegenerative diseases
MeSH terms
Imatinib Mesylate, Dasatinib, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Glaucoma, Humans, Intraocular Pressure, Male, Middle Aged, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Retrospective Studies, Vision, Ocular, Visual Acuity, Cohort Studies, Mice, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review