The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ULK1 phosphorylates Exo70 to suppress breast cancer metastasis
Abstract
Increased expression of protein kinase ULK1 was reported to negatively correlate with breast cancer metastasis. Here we report that ULK1 suppresses the migration and invasion of human breast cancer cells. The suppressive effect is mediated through direct phosphorylation of Exo70, a key component of the exocyst complex. ULK1 phosphorylation inhibits Exo70 homo-oligomerization as well as its assembly to the exocyst complex, which are needed for cell protrusion formation and matrix metalloproteinases secretion during cell invasion. Reversely, upon growth factor stimulation, Exo70 is phosphorylated by ERK1/2, which in turn suppresses its phosphorylation by ULK1. Together, our study identifies Exo70 as a substrate of ULK1 that inhibits cancer metastasis, and demonstrates that two counteractive regulatory mechanisms are well orchestrated during tumor cell invasion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures






Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“MTORC1 activity can be monitored by following the phosphorylation of its substrates, such as EIF4EBP1/4E-BP1/PHAS-I and RPS6KB/p70S6 kinase or the latter's downstream target, RPS6/S6, for which good commercial antibodies are available [731-733].”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [733]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The role of the Atg1/ULK1 complex in autophagy regulation
Mizushima, N. (2010) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2009.12.004 · Cited by 1,062
The mammalian ULK1 complex and autophagy initiation
Zachari, M., & Ganley, I. G. (2017) · Essays in Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/ebc20170021 · Cited by 789
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 68, 394–424 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- Lin, M. G. & Hurley, J. H. Structure and function of the ULK1 complex in autophagy. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 39, 61–68 (2016). · DOI
- Caino, M. C. et al. Metabolic stress regulates cytoskeletal dynamics and metastasis of cancer cells. J. Clin. Investig. 123, 2907–2920 (2013). · DOI
- Jiang, L. et al. Association of the expression of unc-51-Like kinase 1 with lymph node metastasis and survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 7, 1349–1354 (2014).
- Tang, J. et al. Low expression of ULK1 is associated with operable breast cancer progression and is an adverse prognostic marker of survival for patients. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 134, 549–560 (2012). · DOI
- Dower, C. M., Bhat, N., Wang, E. W. & Wang, H. G. Selective reversible inhibition of autophagy in hypoxic breast cancer cells promotes pulmonary metastasis. Cancer Res. 77, 646–657 (2017). · DOI
- TerBush, D. R. & Novick, P. Sec6, Sec8, and Sec15 are components of a multisubunit complex which localizes to small bud tips in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 130, 299–312 (1995). · DOI
- Heider, M. R. & Munson, M. Exorcising the exocyst complex. Traffic 13, 898–907 (2012). · DOI
- Wu, B. & Guo, W. The exocyst at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 128, 2957–2964 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Mei, K. & Guo, W. The exocyst complex. Curr. Biol. 28, R922–R925 (2018). · DOI
- Zhu, Y., Wu, B. & Guo W. The role of Exo70 in exocytosis and beyond. Small GTPases 10, 331–335 (2019). · DOI
- Lu, H. et al. Oncogenic BRAF-mediated melanoma cell invasion. Cell Rep. 15, 2012–2024 (2016). · DOI
- Monteiro, P. et al. Endosomal WASH and exocyst complexes control exocytosis of MT1-MMP at invadopodia. J. Cell Biol. 203, 1063–1079 (2013). · DOI
- Sakurai-Yageta, M. et al. The interaction of IQGAP1 with the exocyst complex is required for tumor cell invasion downstream of Cdc42 and RhoA. J. Cell Biol. 181, 985–998 (2008). · DOI
- Zuo, X. et al. Exo70 interacts with the Arp2/3 complex and regulates cell migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 1383–1388 (2006). · DOI
- Ren, J. & Guo, W. ERK1/2 regulate exocytosis through direct phosphorylation of the exocyst component Exo70. Dev. Cell 22, 967–978 (2012). · DOI
- He, B. & Guo, W. The exocyst complex in polarized exocytosis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 537–542 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
- Liu, J. & Guo, W. The exocyst complex in exocytosis and cell migration. Protoplasma 249, 587–597 (2012). · DOI
- Liu, J. et al. Exo70 stimulates the Arp2/3 complex for lamellipodia formation and directional cell migration. Curr. Biol. 22, 1510–1515 (2012). · DOI
- Xiao, L. et al. Exo70 is an independent prognostic factor in colon cancer. Sci. Rep. 7, 5039 (2017). · DOI
- Biondini, M. et al. Direct interaction between exocyst and Wave complexes promotes cell protrusions and motility. J. Cell Sci. 129, 3756–3769 (2016). · DOI
- Liu, J., Yue, P., Artym, V. V., Mueller, S. C. & Guo, W. The role of the exocyst in matrix metalloproteinase secretion and actin dynamics during tumor cell invadopodia formation. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 3763–3771 (2009). · DOI
- Zhao, Y. et al. Exo70 generates membrane curvature for morphogenesis and cell migration. Dev. Cell 26, 266–278 (2013). · DOI
- Jung, C. H. et al. ULK-Atg13-FIP200 complexes mediate mTOR signaling to the autophagy machinery. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 1992–2003 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
- Dunlop, E. A., Hunt, D. K., Acosta-Jaquez, H. A., Fingar, D. C. & Tee, A. R. ULK1 inhibits mTORC1 signaling, promotes multisite Raptor phosphorylation and hinders substrate binding. Autophagy 7, 737–747 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
- Egan, D. F. et al. Small molecule inhibition of the autophagy kinase ULK1 and Identification of ULK1 substrates. Mol. Cell 59, 285–297 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Mei, K. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the exocyst complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 139–146 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1
Klionsky, D. J., Abdel-Aziz, A. K., Abdelfatah, S., Abdellatif, M., Abdoli, A., Abel, S., Abeliovich, H., Abildgaard, M. H., Abudu, Y. P., Acevedo-Arozena, A., et al. (2021) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280 · Cited by 2,897
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mao, L., Zhan, Y.-Y., Wu, B., Yu, Q., Xu, L., Hong, X., Zhong, L., Mi, P., Xiao, L., Wang, X., Cao, H., Zhang, W., Chen, B., Xiang, J., Mei, K., Radhakrishnan, R., Guo, W., & Hu, T.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2020-01-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2041-1723
- PMC
- PMC6949295
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM111128)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81572589, U1405228, 81472568, 31770860)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review