Cited by 532Bacterial Cancer TherapyProbiotics and Fermented FoodsMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 100 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Developing a new class of engineered live bacterial therapeutics to treat human diseases

Open access

Abstract

A complex interplay of metabolic and immunological mechanisms underlies many diseases that represent a substantial unmet medical need. There is an increasing appreciation of the role microbes play in human health and disease, and evidence is accumulating that a new class of live biotherapeutics comprised of engineered microbes could address specific mechanisms of disease. Using the tools of synthetic biology, nonpathogenic bacteria can be designed to sense and respond to environmental signals in order to consume harmful compounds and deliver therapeutic effectors. In this perspective, we describe considerations for the design and development of engineered live biotherapeutics to achieve regulatory and patient acceptance.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This Perspective argues that engineered live biotherapeutic products (LBPs), especially nonpathogenic bacterial chassis such as *E. coli* Nissle 1917 and *Lactococcus lactis*, can sense and respond to disease environments and deliver therapeutic effectors. It reviews regulatory, design, testing, biomarker, manufacturing, and formulation considerations needed to translate engineered microbes into approved medicines.

Key findings

  • As of the paper, no recombinant LBP has been approved for medicinal use; recombinant LBPs in the United States are regulated by FDA/CBER, the FDA issued 2016 guidance on early clinical trials with LBPs, and the European Pharmacopoeia Supplement 9.7 set LBP quality standards effective April 2019.
  • Table 1 lists 13 engineered bacterial therapeutics in clinical development across chassis including *L. lactis*, *Listeria monocytogenes*, *Bifidobacterium longum*, *Staphylococcus epidermidis*, *E. coli* Nissle 1917, and *Salmonella* Typhi Ty21a; phases range from Phase 1 to Phase 2b, and SYNB1020 is listed as discontinued.
  • SYNB1618, an EcN strain engineered to degrade phenylalanine via phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) and L-amino acid deaminase (LAAD), lowered blood Phe in a mouse PKU model and produced dose-dependent urinary hippuric acid in healthy non-human primates; a Phase 1/2a dose escalation in healthy volunteers and PKU patients (NCT03516487) showed it was generally well tolerated and produced dose-dependent hippuric acid.
  • Preclinical examples support engineered EcN and other strains for gut infections, metabolic disorders, and solid tumors, but design trade-offs include biocontainment, genetic stability, colonization versus non-colonizing dosing, and manufacturing/formulation constraints.

Methods

  • Design: Perspective/narrative review, not primary research; no systematic review or meta-analysis methods are stated.
  • Data or sample: literature synthesis plus Table 1 of engineered bacterial therapeutics in clinical development, with cited preclinical and clinical examples.
  • Main analysis: qualitative discussion of regulatory pathways, strain design, testing strategies, biomarkers, manufacturability, dosing, and formulations.

Limitations

  • Stated: lack of clear mechanistic understanding of disease pathophysiology and a paucity of disease- and effector-related biomarkers to establish dose-response relationships and target engagement; non-colonizing organisms require frequent dosing due to short residence time; few synthetic biology tools exist for strict anaerobes/commensals; regulatory guidance is general with minimal precedent.
  • Stated: manufacturing and clinical trade-offs, including possible viability losses from lyophilization/spray drying, constraints on biomass processes from environmental sensors, and genetic instability under selective pressure.
  • Evident: as a Perspective, it reports no original data, systematic search, or quantitative synthesis; Table 1 is a point-in-time list and may not be exhaustive; most cited therapeutic outcomes are preclinical or early-phase clinical.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-15508-1

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Fig. 1 Considerations for the design of engineered live bacterial therapeutics. a Several aspects require consideration during the design of an engineered bacterial therapeutic. The selection of a chassis organism can be guided by the desired site of activity and pharmacokinetic properties of the chassis, as well as manufacturing feasibility. The design of genetic circuits may also be influenced by the circuit’s effectors, pragmatic concerns regarding inducer compounds, and the genetic stability of regulatory circuits. Critically, the design of an engineered bacterial drug may also be constrained by considerations for the needs of patients. b Optimal strain design often requires a balance between strain suitability for function in the target microenvironment and concerns for feasibility of manufacturing and clinical development.
Fig. 1 Considerations for the design of engineered live bacterial therapeutics. a Several aspects require consideration during the design of an engineered bacterial therapeutic. The selection of a chassis organism can be guided by the desired site of activity and pharmacokinetic properties of the chassis, as well as manufacturing feasibility. The design of genetic circuits may also be influenced by the circuit’s effectors, pragmatic concerns regarding inducer compounds, and the genetic stability of regulatory circuits. Critically, the design of an engineered bacterial drug may also be constrained by considerations for the needs of patients. b Optimal strain design often requires a balance between strain suitability for function in the target microenvironment and concerns for feasibility of manufacturing and clinical development.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Strategy for the development of engineered live bacterial therapeutic clinical candidates. Schematic representation of a workflow for developing clinical candidate-quality engineered strains. The development workflow should incorporate technologies for optimizing strain potency, as well as predictive in vitro and in vivo assays, as well quantitative pharmacology models, to maximize translational potential for patient populations.
Fig. 2 Strategy for the development of engineered live bacterial therapeutic clinical candidates. Schematic representation of a workflow for developing clinical candidate-quality engineered strains. The development workflow should incorporate technologies for optimizing strain potency, as well as predictive in vitro and in vivo assays, as well quantitative pharmacology models, to maximize translational potential for patient populations.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

66 Not checked yet · 19 Own interpretation · 7 No basis given · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 99 references — free account

Show all 42 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 28
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 30
51 of 51
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many diseases that represent a substantial unmet medical need are underlain by a complex interplay of metabolic and immunological mechanisms.

    “A complex interplay of metabolic and immunological mechanisms underlies many diseases that represent a substantial unmet medical need.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The FDA has not approved a live biotherapeutic product for medicinal use to date.

    “the FDA has not approved a live biotherapeutic product for medicinal use to date.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no published guidance that outlines toxicology requirements for LBPs specifically.

    “Since there is no published guidance that outlines toxicology requirements for LBPs specifically”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The specific requirements for development of engineered live bacterial therapeutics in the European Union remain to be defined and may differ from those in the United States.

    “The specific requirements for development of engineered live bacterial therapeutics in the European Union remain to be defined and may differ from those in the United States.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Solid tumors display abnormal blood vessel architecture, resulting in the development of hypoxic regions and a necrotic core that can serve as suitable habitats for obligate and facultative anaerobic bacteria.

    “Solid tumors display abnormal blood vessel architecture, resulting in the development of hypoxic regions and a necrotic core that can serve as suitable habitats for obligate and facultative anaerobic bacteria.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Environmental conditions, including pH, oxygen concentration, and nutrient availability, are major determinants of strain viability and metabolism.

    “Environmental conditions, including pH, oxygen concentration, and nutrient availability, are major determinants of strain viability and metabolism”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The function of engineered biotherapeutic strains in the host environment is a complex, dynamic system.

    “The function of engineered biotherapeutic strains in the host environment represents a complex, dynamic system.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In oral administration of an engineered organism, strain activity is a function of gastric emptying, changing intestinal pH, oxygen and nutrient availability, strain viability, and dose.

    “In the case of oral administration of an engineered organism, strain activity is a function of gastric emptying, changing intestinal pH, oxygen and nutrient availability, strain viability, and dose.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The absence of quantitative biomarkers severely limits the information available to investigators about the function of an engineered live bacterial therapeutic in humans prior to efficacy studies in patients.

    “Conversely, the absence of quantitative biomarkers can severely limit the information available to investigators about the function of an engineered live bacterial therapeutic in humans prior to efficacy studies in patients.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The scale of manufacturing necessary for bacterial therapeutics is determined largely by dosing requirements, and the efficacious dose of an engineered bacterial strain depends on both its encoded mechanism of action and its route of administration.

    “The scale of manufacturing that is necessary for bacterial therapeutics will be determined largely by dosing requirements, and the efficacious dose of an engineered bacterial strain, in turn, is likely to be dependent on both its encoded mechanism of action and its route of administration.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The inclusion of engineered genetic circuits encoding novel effector functions may come at a cost to bacterial fitness and/or growth rates, leading to selective pressure for strain variants that have lost the engineered function and its associated fitness costs.

    “The inclusion of engineered genetic circuits encoding novel effector functions may come at a cost to bacterial fitness and/or growth rates, and this can lead to selective pressure for strain variants that have lost the engineered function and its associated fitness costs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A quantifiable relationship between the effectors expressed by an engineered organism and the underlying mechanisms of disease is necessary in order to engineer an optimal strain.

    “A quantifiable relationship between the effectors expressed by an engineered organism and the underlying mechanisms of disease is necessary in order to engineer an optimal strain, but there remains a paucity of disease- and effector-related biomarkers to establish dose-response relationships, as well as target engagement at the site of action.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There remains a paucity of disease- and effector-related biomarkers to establish dose-response relationships and target engagement at the site of action.

    “A quantifiable relationship between the effectors expressed by an engineered organism and the underlying mechanisms of disease is necessary in order to engineer an optimal strain, but there remains a paucity of disease- and effector-related biomarkers to establish dose-response relationships, as well as target engagement at the site of action.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Current bacterial synthetic biology tools are most advanced for strains of E. coli and Lactobacillus, but there are comparatively few engineering tools for the diverse set of strict anaerobes that reside in the colon.

    “Current bacterial synthetic biology tools are most advanced for strains of E. coli and Lactobacillus, but there are comparatively few engineering tools for the diverse set of strict anaerobes that reside in the colon.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No recombinant live biotherapeutic products have been approved for use in humans.

    “Since no recombinant LBPs have been approved for use in humans, the field will be greatly advanced by the first proof of concept demonstration of an engineered bacterial therapeutic delivering a clinically meaningful impact on disease in patients.”
15 of 15

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 93 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Deal, C. Science and Regulation of Live Microbiome-Based Products Used to Prevent, Treat, or Cure Diseases in Humans - 09/17/2018 - 09/17/2018. (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2019). http://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/workshops-meetings-conferences-biologics/science-and-regulation-live-microbiome-based-products-used-prevent-treat-or-cure-diseases-humans.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Charbonneau, M. R., Isabella, V. M., Li, N., & Kurtz, C. B.
Affiliations
Synlogic (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Kurtz, Caroline B.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-04-08
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
1738-1738
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015470929
Cited by
523
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 118 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 18
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Bacterial Cancer Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
live biotherapeutic products, synthetic biology, non-pathogenic bacteria, metabolic disorders, immune disorders, regulatory considerations, patient acceptance
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Disease, Genetic Engineering, Humans, Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Gastrointestinal Tract

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review