Intelligent driving intelligence test for autonomous vehicles with naturalistic and adversarial environment
Open accessAbstract
Driving intelligence tests are critical to the development and deployment of autonomous vehicles. The prevailing approach tests autonomous vehicles in life-like simulations of the naturalistic driving environment. However, due to the high dimensionality of the environment and the rareness of safety-critical events, hundreds of millions of miles would be required to demonstrate the safety performance of autonomous vehicles, which is severely inefficient. We discover that sparse but adversarial adjustments to the naturalistic driving environment, resulting in the naturalistic and adversarial driving environment, can significantly reduce the required test miles without loss of evaluation unbiasedness. By training the background vehicles to learn when to execute what adversarial maneuver, the proposed environment becomes an intelligent environment for driving intelligence testing. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed environment in a highway-driving simulation. Comparing with the naturalistic driving environment, the proposed environment can accelerate the evaluation process by multiple orders of magnitude.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
CARLA: An open urban driving simulator
Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., & Koltun, V. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.03938 · Cited by 3,718 · see citing works
Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-Learning
Van Hasselt, H., Guez, A., & Silver, D. (2016) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10295 · Cited by 3,318 · see citing works
AirSim: High-Fidelity Visual and Physical Simulation for Autonomous Vehicles
Shah, S., Dey, D., Lovett, C., & Kapoor, A. (2018) · Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67361-5_40 · Cited by 2,254 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- [2]Jacobstein, N. Autonomous vehicles: an imperfect path to saving millions of lives. Sci. Robot. 4, eaaw8703 (2019). 33137753
- [3]Li L Parallel testing of vehicle intelligence via virtual-real interaction Sci. Robot. 2019 4 eaaw4106 10.1126/scirobotics.aaw4106 33137752 · DOI
- [4]Legg S Hutter M Universal intelligence: a definition of machine intelligence Minds Mach. 2007 17 391 444 10.1007/s11023-007-9079-x · DOI · Paper page
- [10]Li W AADS: Augmented autonomous driving simulation using data-driven algorithms Sci. Robot. 2019 4 eaaw0863 10.1126/scirobotics.aaw0863 33137750 · DOI
- [12]Zhao D Accelerated evaluation of automated vehicles safety in lane-change scenarios based on importance sampling techniques IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 2016 18 595 607 10.1109/TITS.2016.2582208 PMC5103645 27840592 · DOI
- [13]Zhao D Huang X Peng H Lam H LeBlanc DJ Accelerated evaluation of automated vehicles in car-following maneuvers IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 2017 19 733 744 10.1109/TITS.2017.2701846 PMC5103645 27840592 · DOI
- [14]Feng, S., Feng, Y., Yu, C., Zhang, Y. & Liu, H. X. Testing scenario library generation for connected and automated vehicles, Part I: Methodology. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transport. Syst. 10.1109/TITS.2020.2972211. (2020). · DOI
- [15]Feng, S. et al. Testing scenario library generation for connected and automated vehicles, Part II: Case studies. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transport. Syst. 10.1109/TITS.2020.2988309. (2020). · DOI
- [16]Feng, S., Feng, Y., Sun, H., Zhang, Y. & Liu, H. X. Testing scenario library generation for connected and automated vehicles: an adaptive framework. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transport. Syst.10.1109/TITS.2020.3023668. (2020). · DOI
- [17]Feng S Safety assessment of highly automated driving systems in test tracks: a new framework Accid. Anal. Prev. 2020 144 105664 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105664 32659494 · DOI
- [18]Mooney, C. Z. Monte Carlo Simulation (Sage Publications, 1997).
- [19]Au SK Beck JL Important sampling in high dimensions Struct. Saf. 2003 25 139 163 10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00047-4 · DOI
- [22]Silver D Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search Nature 2016 529 484 489 10.1038/nature16961 26819042 · DOI · Paper page
- [26]Klitzke, L., Koch, C., Köster, F. Identification of Lane-Change Maneuvers in real-world drivings with hidden markov model and dynamic time warping. In IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Proceedings, ITSC. (2020).
- [27]Sun Z Bebis G Miller R On-road vehicle detection: a review IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006 28 694 711 10.1109/TPAMI.2006.104 16640257 · DOI
- [28]Grigorescu S Trasnea B Cocias T Macesanu G A survey of deep learning techniques for autonomous driving J. Field Robot. 2020 37 362 386 10.1002/rob.21918 · DOI · Paper page
- [29]Henaff, M., LeCun, Y. & Canziani, A. Model-predictive policy learning with uncertainty regularization for driving in dense traffic. In International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019, New Orleans, United States. (2019).
- [30]Treiber M Hennecke A Helbing D Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations Phys. Rev. E 2000 62 1805 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.1805 11088643 · DOI · Paper page
- [31]Sangster J Rakha H Du J Application of naturalistic driving data to modeling of driver car-following behavior Transportation Res. Rec. 2013 2390 20 33 10.3141/2390-03 · DOI
- [32]Zhu M Wang X Tarko A Modeling car-following behavior on urban expressways in Shanghai: a naturalistic driving study Transport. Res. Part C 2018 93 425 445 10.1016/j.trc.2018.06.009 · DOI
- [34]Kesting A Treiber M Helbing D General lane-changing model MOBIL for car-following models Transport. Res. Rec. 2007 1999 86 94 10.3141/1999-10 · DOI
- [37]Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J. & Szegedy, C. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. In International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, United States. (2015).
- [38]Wang W Liu C Zhao D How much data are enough? A statistical approach with case study on longitudinal driving behavior IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 2017 2 85 98 10.1109/TIV.2017.2756342 · DOI
- [39]Kurakin, A., Goodfellow, I. & Bengio, S. Adversarial examples in the physical world. https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.02533 (2016). · arXiv
- [41]Wang, Z. et al. Dueling network architectures for deep reinforcement learning, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. 1995–2003 (PMLR 2016).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wu, J., Huang, Z., Hu, Z., & Lv, C. (2023) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2022.05.017 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Xu, Z., Wang, X., Wang, X., & Zheng, N. (2025) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2025.108011 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Piao, J., Yan, Y., Zhang, J., Li, N., Yan, J., Lan, X., Lu, Z., Zheng, Z., Wang, J. Y., Zhou, D., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.08691 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“Driving follows the IDM model [95] for acceleration and the MOBIL model [54, 35] for lane-changing decisions.”
- Authors
- Feng, S., Yan, X., Sun, H., Feng, Y., & Liu, H. X.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Henry X.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2021-02-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 748-748
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7854639
- OpenAlex
- W3127647470
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 65 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 19.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- University of Michigan
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- autonomous vehicles, safety assessment, simulation-based testing, evaluation efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review