Cited by 413Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyTraffic and Road SafetyHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Intelligent driving intelligence test for autonomous vehicles with naturalistic and adversarial environment

Open access
Feng, Shuo, Yan, Xintao, Sun, Haowei, Feng, Yiheng, Liu, Henry X.·2021·Nature Communications

Abstract

Driving intelligence tests are critical to the development and deployment of autonomous vehicles. The prevailing approach tests autonomous vehicles in life-like simulations of the naturalistic driving environment. However, due to the high dimensionality of the environment and the rareness of safety-critical events, hundreds of millions of miles would be required to demonstrate the safety performance of autonomous vehicles, which is severely inefficient. We discover that sparse but adversarial adjustments to the naturalistic driving environment, resulting in the naturalistic and adversarial driving environment, can significantly reduce the required test miles without loss of evaluation unbiasedness. By training the background vehicles to learn when to execute what adversarial maneuver, the proposed environment becomes an intelligent environment for driving intelligence testing. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed environment in a highway-driving simulation. Comparing with the naturalistic driving environment, the proposed environment can accelerate the evaluation process by multiple orders of magnitude.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-021-21007-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [2]Jacobstein, N. Autonomous vehicles: an imperfect path to saving millions of lives. Sci. Robot. 4, eaaw8703 (2019). 33137753
  2. [3]Li L Parallel testing of vehicle intelligence via virtual-real interaction Sci. Robot. 2019 4 eaaw4106 10.1126/scirobotics.aaw4106 33137752 · DOI
  3. [4]Legg S Hutter M Universal intelligence: a definition of machine intelligence Minds Mach. 2007 17 391 444 10.1007/s11023-007-9079-x · DOI · Paper page
  4. [10]Li W AADS: Augmented autonomous driving simulation using data-driven algorithms Sci. Robot. 2019 4 eaaw0863 10.1126/scirobotics.aaw0863 33137750 · DOI
  5. [12]Zhao D Accelerated evaluation of automated vehicles safety in lane-change scenarios based on importance sampling techniques IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 2016 18 595 607 10.1109/TITS.2016.2582208 PMC5103645 27840592 · DOI
  6. [13]Zhao D Huang X Peng H Lam H LeBlanc DJ Accelerated evaluation of automated vehicles in car-following maneuvers IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 2017 19 733 744 10.1109/TITS.2017.2701846 PMC5103645 27840592 · DOI
  7. [14]Feng, S., Feng, Y., Yu, C., Zhang, Y. & Liu, H. X. Testing scenario library generation for connected and automated vehicles, Part I: Methodology. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transport. Syst. 10.1109/TITS.2020.2972211. (2020). · DOI
  8. [15]Feng, S. et al. Testing scenario library generation for connected and automated vehicles, Part II: Case studies. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transport. Syst. 10.1109/TITS.2020.2988309. (2020). · DOI
  9. [16]Feng, S., Feng, Y., Sun, H., Zhang, Y. & Liu, H. X. Testing scenario library generation for connected and automated vehicles: an adaptive framework. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transport. Syst.10.1109/TITS.2020.3023668. (2020). · DOI
  10. [17]Feng S Safety assessment of highly automated driving systems in test tracks: a new framework Accid. Anal. Prev. 2020 144 105664 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105664 32659494 · DOI
  11. [18]Mooney, C. Z. Monte Carlo Simulation (Sage Publications, 1997).
  12. [19]Au SK Beck JL Important sampling in high dimensions Struct. Saf. 2003 25 139 163 10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00047-4 · DOI
  13. [22]Silver D Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search Nature 2016 529 484 489 10.1038/nature16961 26819042 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [26]Klitzke, L., Koch, C., Köster, F. Identification of Lane-Change Maneuvers in real-world drivings with hidden markov model and dynamic time warping. In IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Proceedings, ITSC. (2020).
  15. [27]Sun Z Bebis G Miller R On-road vehicle detection: a review IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006 28 694 711 10.1109/TPAMI.2006.104 16640257 · DOI
  16. [28]Grigorescu S Trasnea B Cocias T Macesanu G A survey of deep learning techniques for autonomous driving J. Field Robot. 2020 37 362 386 10.1002/rob.21918 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [29]Henaff, M., LeCun, Y. & Canziani, A. Model-predictive policy learning with uncertainty regularization for driving in dense traffic. In International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019, New Orleans, United States. (2019).
  18. [30]Treiber M Hennecke A Helbing D Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations Phys. Rev. E 2000 62 1805 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.1805 11088643 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [31]Sangster J Rakha H Du J Application of naturalistic driving data to modeling of driver car-following behavior Transportation Res. Rec. 2013 2390 20 33 10.3141/2390-03 · DOI
  20. [32]Zhu M Wang X Tarko A Modeling car-following behavior on urban expressways in Shanghai: a naturalistic driving study Transport. Res. Part C 2018 93 425 445 10.1016/j.trc.2018.06.009 · DOI
  21. [34]Kesting A Treiber M Helbing D General lane-changing model MOBIL for car-following models Transport. Res. Rec. 2007 1999 86 94 10.3141/1999-10 · DOI
  22. [37]Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J. & Szegedy, C. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. In International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, United States. (2015).
  23. [38]Wang W Liu C Zhao D How much data are enough? A statistical approach with case study on longitudinal driving behavior IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 2017 2 85 98 10.1109/TIV.2017.2756342 · DOI
  24. [39]Kurakin, A., Goodfellow, I. & Bengio, S. Adversarial examples in the physical world. https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.02533 (2016). · arXiv
  25. [41]Wang, Z. et al. Dueling network architectures for deep reinforcement learning, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. 1995–2003 (PMLR 2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feng, S., Yan, X., Sun, H., Feng, Y., & Liu, H. X.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Henry X.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2021-02-02
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
748-748
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3127647470
Cited by
413
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 1
FWCI
19.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University of Michigan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, safety assessment, simulation-based testing, evaluation efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review