Blood-brain barrier opening with focused ultrasound in Parkinson’s disease dementia
Open accessAbstract
MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS), in combination with intravenous microbubble administration, has been applied for focal temporary BBB opening in patients with neurodegenerative disorders and brain tumors. MRgFUS could become a therapeutic tool for drug delivery of putative neurorestorative therapies. Treatment for Parkinson’s disease with dementia (PDD) is an important unmet need. We initiated a prospective, single-arm, non-randomized, proof-of-concept, safety and feasibility phase I clinical trial (NCT03608553), which is still in progress. The primary outcomes of the study were to demonstrate the safety, feasibility and reversibility of BBB disruption in PDD, targeting the right parieto-occipito-temporal cortex where cortical pathology is foremost in this clinical state. Changes in β-amyloid burden, brain metabolism after treatments and neuropsychological assessments, were analyzed as exploratory measurements. Five patients were recruited from October 2018 until May 2019, and received two treatment sessions separated by 2–3 weeks. The results are set out in a descriptive manner. Overall, this procedure was feasible and reversible with no serious clinical or radiological side effects. We report BBB opening in the parieto-occipito-temporal junction in 8/10 treatments in 5 patients as demonstrated by gadolinium enhancement. In all cases the procedures were uneventful and no side effects were encountered associated with BBB opening. From pre- to post-treatment, mild cognitive improvement was observed, and no major changes were detected in amyloid or fluorodeoxyglucose PET. MRgFUS-BBB opening in PDD is thus safe, reversible, and can be performed repeatedly. This study provides encouragement for the concept of BBB opening for drug delivery to treat dementia in PD and other neurodegenerative disorders.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Burgess, A., Dubey, S., Yeung, S., Hough, O., Eterman, N., Aubert, I., & Hynynen, K. (2014) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.14140245 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Nisbet, R. M., Van der Jeugd, A., Leinenga, G., Evans, H. T., Janowicz, P. W., & Götz, J. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx052 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Functionalized Nanomaterials Capable of Crossing the Blood–Brain Barrier
Zha, S., Liu, H., Li, H., Li, H., Wong, K.-L., & All, A. H. (2024) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c10674 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Wang, J., Li, Z., Pan, M., Fiaz, M., Hao, Y., Yan, Y., Sun, L., & Yan, F. (2022) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2022.114539 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Rouhi, N., Chakeri, Z., Ghorbani Nejad, B., Rahimzadegan, M., Rafi Khezri, M., Kamali, H., & Nosrati, R. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37533 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Tanaka, M., Araujo, A. C., Valenti, V. E., Guiguer, E. L., Catharin, V. C. S., Gualhardi, C. M., de Souza Bastos Mazuqueli Pereira, E., de Alvares Goulart, R., de Argolo Haber, R. S., de Carvalho, A. C. A., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms27052370 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gasca-Salas, C., Fernández-Rodríguez, B., Pineda-Pardo, J. A., Rodríguez-Rojas, R., Obeso, I., Hernández-Fernández, F., del Álamo, M., Mata, D., Guida, P., Ordás-Bandera, C., Montero-Roblas, J. I., Martínez-Fernández, R., Foffani, G., Rachmilevitch, I., & Obeso, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Universidad San Pablo CEU (ES)
- University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur (ES)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2021-02-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 779-779
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7859400
- OpenAlex
- W3127037572
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 17
- FWCI
- 14.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Depósito Digital e-UCJC (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Fundación de Investigación HM Hospitales
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease dementia, blood-brain barrier opening, MR-guided focused ultrasound, microbubbles, amyloid-beta, brain glucose metabolism, cognitive enhancement, brain drug delivery, neurodegenerative diseases
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain Neoplasms, Contrast Media, Dementia, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Parkinson Disease, Prospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Microbubbles, Positron-Emission Tomography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review