The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Steering surface reconstruction of copper with electrolyte additives for CO2 electroreduction
Open accessAbstract
Electrocatalytic CO 2 reduction to value-added hydrocarbon products using metallic copper (Cu) catalysts is a potentially sustainable approach to facilitate carbon neutrality. However, Cu metal suffers from unavoidable and uncontrollable surface reconstruction during electrocatalysis, which can have either adverse or beneficial effects on its electrocatalytic performance. In a break from the current catalyst design path, we propose a strategy guiding the reconstruction process in a favorable direction to improve the performance. Typically, the controlled surface reconstruction is facilely realized using an electrolyte additive, ethylenediamine tetramethylenephosphonic acid, to substantially promote CO 2 electroreduction to CH 4 for commercial polycrystalline Cu. As a result, a stable CH 4 Faradaic efficiency of 64% with a partial current density of 192 mA cm−2, thus enabling an impressive CO 2-to-CH 4 conversion rate of 0.25 µmol cm−2 s−1, is achieved in an alkaline flow cell. We believe our study will promote the exploration of electrochemical reconstruction and provide a promising route for the discovery of high-performance electrocatalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte
Nitopi, S., Bertheussen, E., Scott, S. B., Liu, X., Engstfeld, A. K., Horch, S., Seger, B., Stephens, I. E. L., Chan, K., Hahn, C., et al. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 · Cited by 5,223
How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels
Peterson, A. A., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., Rossmeisl, J., & Nørskov, J. K. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00071j · Cited by 3,784
CO 2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface
Dinh, C.-T., Burdyny, T., Kibria, M. G., Seifitokaldani, A., Gabardo, C. M., García de Arquer, F. P., Kiani, A., Edwards, J. P., De Luna, P., Bushuyev, O. S., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aas9100 · Cited by 2,515
Activity Descriptors for CO 2 Electroreduction to Methane on Transition-Metal Catalysts
Peterson, A. A., & Nørskov, J. K. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz201461p · Cited by 1,667
Recent Advances in Inorganic Heterogeneous Electrocatalysts for Reduction of Carbon Dioxide
Zhu, D. D., Liu, J. L., & Qiao, S. Z. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201504766 · Cited by 1,594
Competition between CO 2 Reduction and H 2 Evolution on Transition-Metal Electrocatalysts
Zhang, Y.-J., Sethuraman, V., Michalsky, R., & Peterson, A. A. (2014) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs5012298 · Cited by 509
Cited by
Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Zhao, J., Wei, Y., Chen, S., Zhao, H., Su, Y., Ding, S., & Xiao, C. (2024) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.3c05880 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, Z., Han, D., Chen, Z., Gao, J., Jiang, G., Wang, X., Lyu, S., Guo, Y., Geng, C., Yin, L., Weng, Z., & Yang, Q.-H.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2022-06-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3158-3158
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4281766318
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Steering surface reconstruction of copper with electrolyte additives for CO2 electroreduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-022-30819-1
- The paper
- Han, Z., Han, D., Chen, Z., Gao, J., Jiang, G., Wang, X., Lyu, S., Guo, Y., Geng, C., Yin, L., Weng, Z., & Yang, Q.-H. (2022). Steering surface reconstruction of copper with electrolyte additives for CO2 electroreduction. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30819-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.