The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Innate immune responses against the fungal pathogen Candida auris
Open accessAbstract
Candida auris is a multidrug-resistant human fungal pathogen responsible for nosocomial outbreaks worldwide. Although considerable progress has increased our understanding of the biological and clinical aspects of C. auris, its interaction with the host immune system is only now beginning to be investigated in-depth. Here, we compare the innate immune responses induced by C. auris BJCA001 and Candida albicans SC5314 in vitro and in vivo. Our results indicate that C. auris BJCA001 appears to be less immunoinflammatory than C. albicans SC5314, and this differential response correlates with structural features of the cell wall.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures







Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“C. auris differentially stimulates cytokine production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, decreases phagocytosis by neutrophils, and has a more potent binding to IgG than C. albicans [13–15].”
From The Emerging Fungal Pathogen Candida auris Induces IFNγ to Colonize the Skin (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Recent evidence indicates that differences in mannan composition between C. auris and C. albicans contribute to decreased innate immune recognition, phagocytic activity, and clearance of C. auris in human neutrophils (13, 27, 28).”
From Differential skin immune responses in mice intradermally infected with Candida auris and Candida albicans (2023) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“C. auris differentially stimulates cytokine production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and has a more potent binding to IgG than C. albicans [14, 15].”
From Single-cell transcriptomics unveils skin cell specific antifungal immune responses and IL-1Ra- IL-1R immune evasion strategies of emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In the recent studies on the host transcriptome of C. auris in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and mouse BMDMs, the NOD-like receptor signaling pathway was only enriched in the C. auris infection but not in C. albicans infection [13, 14]”
From Single-cell transcriptomics unveils skin cell specific antifungal immune responses and IL-1Ra- IL-1R immune evasion strategies of emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Collectively, yeast, filamentous, and aggregative forms of C. auris elicit distinct magnitudes of Th17 activation, likely reflecting differences in cell wall composition and surface antigen exposure (Fig 4) [87,113].”
From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [113]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“C. auris differentially stimulates cytokine production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, decreases phagocytosis by neutrophils, and has a more potent binding to IgG than C. albicans [13–15].”
From The Emerging Fungal Pathogen Candida auris Induces IFNγ to Colonize the Skin (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Recent evidence indicates that C. auris elicits less potent innate immune responses compared to C. albicans in the mouse model of systemic infection (13).”
From Differential skin immune responses in mice intradermally infected with Candida auris and Candida albicans (2023) · cites this paper as [13]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Recent evidence suggests that neutrophils are less efficient in recognizing and killing C. auris (29) due to the presence of a dense mannan layer (30) and recruit significantly fewer neutrophils than the C. albicans in the murine infection (5, 31).”
From Cell aggregation mediated by ACE2 deletion in Candida auris modulates fungal colonization and host immune responses in the skin (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“was associated with enhanced fungal killing by neutrophils and macrophages (62, 63).”
From The Candida auris Hog1 MAP kinase is essential for the colonization of murine skin and intradermal persistence (2024) · cites this paper as [62]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“C. auris differentially stimulates cytokine production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, decreases phagocytosis by neutrophils, and has a more potent binding to IgG than C. albicans [13–15].”
From The Emerging Fungal Pathogen Candida auris Induces IFNγ to Colonize the Skin (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hidden Killers: Human Fungal Infections
Brown, G. D., Denning, D. W., Gow, N. A. R., Levitz, S. M., Netea, M. G., & White, T. C. (2012) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3004404 · Cited by 4,284
Immunobiology: the immune system in health and disease
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-3876 · Cited by 4,111
Isogenic strain construction and gene mapping in Candida albicans.
Fonzi, W. A., & Irwin, M. Y. (1993) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/134.3.717 · Cited by 1,695
Innate Immune Pattern Recognition: A Cell Biological Perspective
Brubaker, S. W., Bonham, K. S., Zanoni, I., & Kagan, J. C. (2015) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112240 · Cited by 1,475
Signalling through C-type lectin receptors: shaping immune responses
Geijtenbeek, T. B. H., & Gringhuis, S. I. (2009) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2569 · Cited by 1,449
Satoh, K., Makimura, K., Hasumi, Y., Nishiyama, Y., Uchida, K., & Yamaguchi, H. (2009) · Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.2008.00083.x · Cited by 1,381
The structure and synthesis of the fungal cell wall
Bowman, S. M., & Free, S. J. (2006) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20441 · Cited by 1,320
Candida albicans morphogenesis and host defence: discriminating invasion from colonization
Gow, N. A. R., van de Veerdonk, F. L., Brown, A. J. P., & Netea, M. G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2711 · Cited by 888
Netea, M. G. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci27114 · Cited by 754
The SAT1 flipper, an optimized tool for gene disruption in Candida albicans
Reuß, O., Vik, Å., Kolter, R., & Morschhäuser, J. (2004) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2004.06.021 · Cited by 744
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–107 of 107
From confrontation to co-adaptation: the dynamic dialogue of Candida albicans and macrophages
Miramón, P., Wilson, H. B., & Lorenz, M. C. (2026) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00191-22
Holt, A. M., Horton, M. V., Johnson, C. J., Żarnowski, R., Vang, P. C., Dean, M., Kaas, A., Andes, B. D., Jones, R., Lowman, D. W., et al. (2026) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01701-26
Sarker, M. T., & Bisha, B. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.09.21.753102
Soni, A., Vrzoňová, R., Paulovičová, L., Bzducha‐Wróbel, A., & Farkaš, P. (2026) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2026.154672
Kamasah, J. S., Akin, B. E., Baker, L. J., Taba, A., Mahjouri‐Samani, M., & Hasim, S. (2026) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.00184-26
Ukolobi, O., Jacob, J. N., Akpo, M. O., Edo, G. I., Agbo, J. J., Orogu, J. O., Yousif, E., Jikah, A. N., Akpoghelie, P. O., Oghroro, E. E. A., et al. (2026) · Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2026.117711
Breaking the wall: methodologies for lysing fungus and extracting its nucleic acid
富全英, Gong, K., Feng, S., Yap, P.-W., Zhou, C., & Zhou, J. (2026) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2026.120145
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Zou, Y., Chen, X., Li, H., Yin, Z., Zhang, B., Xu, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, R., Huang, X., Yang, W., Xu, C., Jiang, T., Tang, Q., Zhou, Z., Ji, Y., Liu, Y., Hu, L., Zhou, J., Zhou, Y., Zhao, J., Liu, N., Huang, G., Chang, H., Fang, W., Chen, C., & Zhou, D.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology (CN)
- Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Jiangnan University (CN)
- Shanghai University (CN)
- Tongji University (CN)
- Gannan Medical University (CN)
- Guangxi Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Fudan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Changbin
- Zhou, Dongsheng
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2022-06-21
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3553-3553
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9213489
- OpenAlex
- W4283321860
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 9.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (2019SHZDZX02, 20ZR1463800)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31600119, BM2020019, 2020YFA0907200, 2019SHZDZX02, 32070146, 32170195, 31870141)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (153831KYSB20170043, KGFZD-135-19-11)
- Government of Jiangsu Province
- Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (31600119)
- State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity
- Youth Innovation Promotion Association
- Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Keywords
- Candida auris, innate immunity, Candida albicans, fungal pathogen-host interaction, immune inflammation, cell wall structure, multidrug resistance, hospital outbreak
- MeSH terms
- Candida auris, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Microbial Sensitivity Tests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review