Cited by 16Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsBiochemical and Structural Characterization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dual function of OmpM as outer membrane tether and nutrient uptake channel in diderm Firmicutes

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The outer membrane (OM) in diderm, or Gram-negative, bacteria must be tethered to peptidoglycan for mechanical stability and to maintain cell morphology. Most diderm phyla from the Terrabacteria group have recently been shown to lack well-characterised OM attachment systems, but instead have OmpM, which could represent an ancestral tethering system in bacteria. Here, we have determined the structure of the most abundant OmpM protein from Veillonella parvula (diderm Firmicutes) by single particle cryogenic electron microscopy. We also characterised the channel properties of the transmembrane β-barrel of OmpM and investigated the structure and PG-binding properties of its periplasmic stalk region. Our results show that OM tethering and nutrient acquisition are genetically linked in V. parvula , and probably other diderm Terrabacteria. This dual function of OmpM may have played a role in the loss of the OM in ancestral bacteria and the emergence of monoderm bacterial lineages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-023-42601-y

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 104

  1. Silhavy, T. J., Ruiz, N. & Kahne, D. Advances in understanding bacterial outer-membrane biogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 41, 57–66 (2006).
  2. Sun, J., Rutherford, S. T., Silhavy, T. J. & Huang, K. C. Physical properties of the bacterial outer membrane. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 236–248 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bladen, H. A. & Mergenhagen, S. E. Ultrastructure of Veillonella and morphological correlation of an outer membrane with particles associated with endotoxic activity. J. Bacteriol. 88, 1482 (1964). · DOI
  4. Rojas, E. R. et al. The outer membrane is an essential load-bearing element in Gram-negative bacteria. Nature 559, 617–621 (2018). · DOI
  5. Braun, V. & Rehn, K. Chemical characterization, spatial distribution and function of a lipoprotein (murein-lipoprotein) of the E. coli cell wall. Eur. J. Biochem. 10, 426–438 (1969). · DOI
  6. Braun, V. Covalent lipoprotein from the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Rev. Biomembr. 415, 335–377 (1975). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cascales, E., Bernadac, A., Gavioli, M., Lazzaroni, J. C. & Lloubes, R. Pal lipoprotein of Escherichia coli plays a major role in outer membrane integrity. J. Bacteriol. 184, 754–759 (2002). · DOI
  8. Bouveret, E., Bénédetti, H., Rigal, A., Loret, E. & Lazdunski, C. In vitro characterization of peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein (PAL)- peptidoglycan and PAL-TolB interactions. J. Bacteriol. 181, 6306–6311 (1999). · DOI
  9. Parsons, L. M., Lin, F. & Orban, J. Peptidoglycan recognition by Pal, an outer membrane lipoprotein. Biochemistry 45, 2122–2128 (2006). · DOI
  10. Park, J. S. et al. Mechanism of anchoring of OmpA protein to the cell wall peptidoglycan of the gram-negative bacterial outer membrane. FASEB J. 26, 219–228 (2012). · DOI
  11. Samsudin, F., Boags, A., Piggot, T. J. & Khalid, S. Braun’s lipoprotein facilitates OmpA interaction with the Escherichia coli cell wall. Biophys. J. 113, 1496–1504 (2017). · DOI
  12. Sonntag, I., Schwarz, H., Hirota, Y. & Henning, U. Cell envelope and shape of Escherichia coli: multiple mutants missing the outer membrane lipoprotein and other major outer membrane proteins. J. Bacteriol. 136, 280 (1978). · DOI
  13. Suzuki, H. et al. Murein-lipoprotein of Escherichia coli: a protein involved in the stabilization of bacterial cell envelope. Mol. Gen. Genet. 167, 1–9 (1978). · DOI
  14. Bernadac, A., Gavioli, M., Lazzaroni, J. C., Raina, S. & Lloubès, R. Escherichia coli tol-pal mutants form outer membrane vesicles. J. Bacteriol. 180, 4872–4878 (1998). · DOI
  15. Wang, Y. The function of OmpA in Escherichia coli. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 292, 396–401 (2002). · DOI
  16. Witwinowski, J. et al. An ancient divide in outer membrane tethering systems in bacteria suggests a mechanism for the diderm-to-monoderm transition. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 411–422 (2022). · DOI
  17. Kalmokoff, M. L. et al. Physical and genetic characterization of an outer-membrane protein (OmpM1) containing an N-terminal S-layer-like homology domain from the phylogenetically Gram-positive gut anaerobe Mitsuokella multacida. Anaerobe 15, 74–81 (2009). · DOI
  18. Kojima, S. et al. Cadaverine covalently linked to peptidoglycan is required for interaction between the peptidoglycan and the periplasm-exposed S-layer-homologous domain of major outer membrane protein Mep45 in Selenomonas ruminantium. J. Bacteriol. 192, 5953–5961 (2010). · DOI
  19. Kojima, S. et al. Peptidoglycan-associated outer membrane protein Mep45 of rumen anaerobe Selenomonas ruminantium forms a non-specific diffusion pore via its C-terminal transmembrane domain. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 80, 1954 (2016). · DOI
  20. Kowata, H., Tochigi, S., Takahashi, H. & Kojima, S. Outer membrane permeability of cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803: studies of passive diffusion of small organic nutrients reveal the absence of classical porins and intrinsically low permeability. J. Bacteriol. 199, 10-1128 (2017). · DOI
  21. Ravi, J. & Fioravanti, A. S-layers: the proteinaceous multifunctional armors of gram-positive pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 12, 663468 (2021). · DOI
  22. Mesnage, S. et al. Bacterial SLH domain proteins are non-covalently anchored to the cell surface via a conserved mechanism involving wall polysaccharide pyruvylation. EMBO J. 19, 4473–4484 (2000). · DOI
  23. Kern, J., Ryan, C., Faull, K. & Schneewind, O. Bacillus anthracis surface-layer proteins assemble by binding to the secondary cell wall polysaccharide in a manner that requires csaB and tagO. J. Mol. Biol. 401, 757–775 (2010). · DOI
  24. Missiakas, D. & Schneewind, O. Assembly and Function of the Bacillus anthracis S-Layer. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 71, 79–98 (2017). · DOI
  25. Olabarría, C., Carrascosa, J. L., De Pedro, M. A. & Berenguer, J. A conserved motif in S-layer proteins is involved in peptidoglycan binding in Thermus thermophilus. J. Bacteriol. 178, 4765 (1996). · DOI
  26. Cava, F., De Pedro, M. A., Schwarz, H., Henne, A. & Berenguer, J. Binding to pyruvylated compounds as an ancestral mechanism to anchor the outer envelope in primitive bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 52, 677–690 (2004). · DOI
  27. Kusama, S. et al. Order-of-magnitude enhancement in photocurrent generation of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 by outer membrane deprivation. Nat. Commun. 13, 3067 (2022). · DOI
  28. Kamio, Y., Itoh, Y. & Terawaki, Y. Chemical structure of peptidoglycan in Selenomonas ruminantium: cadaverine links covalently to the D-glutamic acid residue of peptidoglycan. J. Bacteriol. 146, 49–53 (1981). · DOI
  29. Kamio, Y. & Nakamura, K. Putrescine and cadaverine are constituents of peptidoglycan in Veillonella alcalescens and Veillonella parvula. J. Bacteriol. 169, 2881–2884 (1987). · DOI
  30. Fernandez-Herrero, L. A., Olabarria, G., Caston, J. R., Lasa, I. & Berenguer, J. Horizontal transference of S-layer genes within Thermus thermophilus. J. Bacteriol. 177, 5460 (1995). · DOI
  31. Rothfuss, H., Lara, J. C., Schmid, A. K. & Lidstrom, M. E. Involvement of the S-layer proteins Hpi and SlpA in the maintenance of cell envelope integrity in Deinococcus radiodurans R1. Microbiology 152, 2779–2787 (2006). · DOI
  32. von Kügelgen, A., van Dorst, S., Alva, V. & Bharat, T. A. M. A multidomain connector links the outer membrane and cell wall in phylogenetically deep-branching bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2203156119 (2022). · DOI
  33. Nikaido, H. & Vaara, M. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability. Microbiol. Rev. 49, 1 (1985). · DOI
  34. Nikaido, H. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67, 593–656 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  35. Ruggiu, F. et al. Size matters and how you measure it: a gram-negative antibacterial example exceeding typical molecular weight limits. ACS Infect. Dis. 5, 1688–1692 (2019). · DOI
  36. Poppleton, D. I. et al. Outer membrane proteome of Veillonella parvula: a diderm firmicute of the human microbiome. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1215 (2017). · DOI
  37. Farci, D. et al. The cryo-EM structure of the S-layer deinoxanthin-binding complex of Deinococcus radiodurans informs properties of its environmental interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 298, 102031 (2022). · DOI
  38. Farci, D., Graça, A. T., Iesu, L., de Sanctis, D. & Piano, D. The SDBC is active in quenching oxidative conditions and bridges the cell envelope layers in Deinococcus radiodurans. J. Biol. Chem. 299, 102784 (2023). · DOI
  39. Farci, D., Haniewicz, P. & Piano, D. The structured organization of Deinococcus radiodurans’ cell envelope. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 119, e2209111119 (2022). · DOI
  40. von Kügelgen, A. et al. Interdigitated immunoglobulin arrays form the hyperstable surface layer of the extremophilic bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2215808120 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  41. Cowan, S. W. et al. Crystal structures explain functional properties of two E. coli porins. Nature 358, 727–733 (1992). · DOI
  42. Baslé, A., Rummel, G., Storici, P., Rosenbusch, J. P. & Schirmer, T. Crystal structure of osmoporin OmpC from E. coli at 2.0 A. J. Mol. Biol. 362, 933–942 (2006). · DOI
  43. Kern, J. et al. Structure of surface layer homology (SLH) domains from Bacillus anthracis surface array protein. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 26042–26049 (2011). · DOI
  44. Blackler, R. J. et al. Structural basis of cell wall anchoring by SLH domains in Paenibacillus alvei. Nat. Commun. 2018, 1–11 (2018). 91 9.
  45. Sychantha, D. et al. Molecular basis for the attachment of S-layer proteins to the cell wall of Bacillus anthracis. Biochemistry 57, 1949–1953 (2018). · DOI
  46. Legg, M. S. G. et al. The S-layer homology domains of Paenibacillus alvei surface protein SpaA bind to cell wall polysaccharide through the terminal monosaccharide residue. J. Biol. Chem. 298, 101745 (2022). · DOI
  47. Vassylyev, D. G., Tomitori, H., Kashiwagi, K., Morikawa, K. & Igarashi, K. Crystal structure and mutational analysis of the Escherichia coli putrescine receptor: STRUCTURAL BASIS FOR SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 17604–17609 (1998). · DOI
  48. Wu, D. et al. Structural basis of substrate binding specificity revealed by the crystal structures of polyamine receptors SpuD and SpuE from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Mol. Biol. 416, 697–712 (2012). · DOI
  49. Bale, S. et al. Structural basis for putrescine activation of human S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase. Biochemistry 47, 13404–13417 (2008). · DOI
  50. Sagong, H. Y. et al. Crystal structure and pyridoxal 5-phosphate binding property of lysine decarboxylase from Selenomonas ruminantium. PLoS One 11, e0166667 (2016). · DOI
  51. Kröger, P., Shanmugaratnam, S., Ferruz, N., Schweimer, K. & Höcker, B. A comprehensive binding study illustrates ligand recognition in the periplasmic binding protein PotF. Structure 29, 433–443.e4 (2021). · DOI
  52. Holm, L. Dali server: structural unification of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, W210–W215 (2022). · DOI
  53. Moonens, K. et al. Structural insights into polymorphic ABO glycan binding by Helicobacter pylori. Cell Host Microbe 19, 55–66 (2016). · DOI
  54. Smart, O. S., Neduvelil, J. G., Wang, X., Wallace, B. A. & Sansom, M. S. P. HOLE: a program for the analysis of the pore dimensions of ion channel structural models. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 354–360 (1996). · DOI
  55. Vasan, A. K. et al. Role of internal loop dynamics in antibiotic permeability of outer membrane porins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2117009119 (2022). · DOI
  56. Gutiérrez, S. A., Bodrenko, I., Scorciapino, M. A. & Ceccarelli, M. Macroscopic electric field inside water-filled biological nanopores. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 8855–8864 (2016). · DOI
  57. Bajaj, H. et al. Bacterial outer membrane porins as electrostatic nanosieves: exploring transport rules of small polar molecules. ACS Nano 11, 5465–5473 (2017). · DOI
  58. Nestorovich, E. M., Rostovtseva, T. K. & Bezrukov, S. M. Residue ionization and ion transport through OmpF channels. Biophys. J. 85, 3718–3729 (2003). · DOI
  59. Schmitt, E. K., Vrouenraets, M. & Steinem, C. Channel activity of OmpF monitored in nano-BLMs. Biophys. J. 91, 2163–2171 (2006). · DOI
  60. Vandeputte-Rutten, L. et al. Crystal structure of the outer membrane protease OmpT from Escherichia coli suggests a novel catalytic site. EMBO J. 20, 5033–5039 (2001). · DOI
  61. Eren, E., Murphy, M., Goguen, J. & van den Berg, B. An active site water network in the plasminogen activator Pla from Yersinia pestis. Structure 18, 809–818 (2010). · DOI
  62. Hong, H., Patel, D. R., Tamm, L. K. & Van Den Berg, B. The outer membrane protein OmpW forms an eight-stranded β-barrel with a hydrophobic channel. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 7568–7577 (2006). · DOI
  63. Hong, H., Szabo, G. & Tamm, L. K. Electrostatic couplings in OmpA ion-channel gating suggest a mechanism for pore opening. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 627–635 (2006). 211 2. · DOI
  64. Mader, C., Huber, C., Moll, D., Sleytr, U. B. & Sára, M. Interaction of the crystalline bacterial cell surface layer protein SbsB and the secondary cell wall polymer of Geobacillus stearothermophilus PV72 assessed by real-time surface plasmon resonance biosensor technology. J. Bacteriol. 186, 1758–1768 (2004). · DOI
  65. Janesch, B., Messner, P. & Schäffer, C. Are the surface layer homology domains essential for cell surface display and glycosylation of the S-layer protein from Paenibacillus alvei CCM 2051T? J. Bacteriol. 195, 565–575 (2013). · DOI
  66. Merino, N. et al. Living at the extremes: extremophiles and the limits of life in a planetary context. Front. Microbiol. 10, 447668 (2019).
  67. Green, M. R. & Sambrook, J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Fourth Edition) (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2012).
  68. Knapp, S. et al. Natural competence is common among clinical isolates of Veillonella parvula and is useful for genetic manipulation of this key member of the oral microbiome. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 7, 139 (2017). · DOI
  69. Béchon, N. et al. Autotransporters drive biofilm formation and autoaggregation in the diderm firmicute Veillonella parvula. J. Bacteriol. 202, e00461–20 (2020). · DOI
  70. Inoue, H., Nojima, H. & Okayama, H. High efficiency transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. Gene 96, 23–28 (1990). · DOI
  71. Jacques, I. B. et al. Analysis of 51 cyclodipeptide synthases reveals the basis for substrate specificity. Nat. Chem. Biol. 119, 721–727 (2015). · DOI
  72. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 143, 290–296 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  73. Punjani, A., Zhang, H. & Fleet, D. J. Non-uniform refinement: adaptive regularization improves single-particle cryo-EM reconstruction. Nat. Methods 1712, 1214–1221 (2020). · DOI
  74. Hoh, S. W., Burnley, T. & Cowtan, K. Current approaches for automated model building into cryo-EM maps using Buccaneer with CCP-EM. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D., Struct. Biol. 76, 531–541 (2020). · DOI
  75. Wood, C. et al. Collaborative computational project for electron cryo-microscopy. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 71, 123–126 (2015). · DOI
  76. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  77. Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D., Struct. Biol. 75, 861–877 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  78. Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  79. Winter, G. Xia2: An expert system for macromolecular crystallography data reduction. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 43, 186–190 (2010). · DOI
  80. Evans, P. R. & Murshudov, G. N. How good are my data and what is the resolution? Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 69, 1204–1214 (2013). · DOI
  81. Evans, P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 72–82 (2006). · DOI
  82. Rodríguez, D. D. et al. Crystallographic ab initio protein structure solution below atomic resolution. Nat. Methods 2009, 651–653 (2009). 69 6. · DOI
  83. Potterton, L. et al. CCP4i2: the new graphical user interface to the CCP4 program suite. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D., Struct. Biol. 74, 68 (2018). · DOI
  84. Wheeler, R., Veyrier, F., Werts, C. & Boneca, I. G. Peptidoglycan and Nod Receptor. In Glycoscience: Biology and Medicine (eds. Taniguchi, N., Endo, T., Hart, G., Seeberger, P. & Wong, C. H.) 737–747 (Springer Tokyo, 2015). · DOI
  85. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021). · DOI
  86. Lee, J. et al. CHARMM-GUI membrane builder for complex biological membrane simulations with glycolipids and lipoglycans. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 775–786 (2019). · DOI
  87. Huang, J. & Mackerell, A. D. CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: validation based on comparison to NMR data. J. Comput. Chem. 34, 2135–2145 (2013). · DOI
  88. Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926 (1998). · DOI
  89. Van Der Spoel, D. et al. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1701–1718 (2005). · DOI
  90. Essmann, U. et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577–8593 (1995). · DOI
  91. Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H. J. C. & Fraaije, J. G. E. M. LINCS: A Linear Constraint Solver for molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 18, 1463–1472 (1997). · DOI
  92. Goldstein, A. A. On steepest descent. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. Ser. A Control 3, 147–151 (1965). · DOI
  93. Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., Van Gunsteren, W. F., Dinola, A. & Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684–3690 (1984). · DOI
  94. Nosé, S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511–519 (1984). · DOI
  95. Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182 (1998). · DOI
  96. Michaud-Agrawal, N., Denning, E. J., Woolf, T. B. & Beckstein, O. MDAnalysis: a toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 2319–2327 (2011). · DOI
  97. Gowers, R. et al. MDAnalysis: a python package for the rapid analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. in Proceedings of the 15th Python in Science Conference 98–105 (SciPy, 2016). · DOI
  98. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  99. Wieczór, M., Hospital, A., Bayarri, G., Czub, J. & Orozco, M. Molywood: streamlining the design and rendering of molecular movies. Bioinformatics 36, 4660–4661 (2020). · DOI
  100. Montal, M. & Mueller, P. Formation of bimolecular membranes from lipid monolayers and a study of their electrical properties. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 69, 3561 (1972). · DOI
  101. Nikaido, H. & Rosenberg, E. Y. Porin channels in Escherichia coli: studies with liposomes reconstituted from purified proteins. J. Bacteriol. 153, 241–252 (1983). · DOI
  102. Xie, Y. et al. IBS 2.0: an upgraded illustrator for the visualization of biological sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, W420–W426 (2022). · DOI
  103. Ashkenazy, H. et al. ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W344–W350 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  104. Efremov, R. G. & Sazanov, L. A. Structure of Escherichia coli OmpF porin from lipidic mesophase. J. Struct. Biol. 178, 311–318 (2012). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Silale, A., Zhu, Y., Witwinowski, J., Smith, R. E., Newman, K. E., Bhamidimarri, S. P., Baslé, A., Khalid, S., Beloin, C., Gribaldo, S., & van den Berg, B.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Institut Pasteur (FR)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Beloin, Christophe
  • Gribaldo, Simonetta
  • van den Berg, Bert
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2023-11-06
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
7152-7152
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388407503
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (214222/Z/18/Z)
  • RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/V030779/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
Keywords
Veillonella parvula, Gram-negative bacteria, peptidoglycan binding, transmembrane beta-barrel, bacterial morphology
MeSH terms
Firmicutes, Bacillota, Nutrients, Bacteria, Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins, Cell Membrane, Cell Wall, Gram-Negative Bacteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review