Cited by 74Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGenetic factors in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

Contribution of pks+ E. coli mutations to colorectal carcinogenesis

Open access
Chen, Bingjie, Ramazzotti, Daniele, Heide, Timon, Spiteri, Inmaculada, Fernandez-Mateos, Javier, James, Chela, Magnani, Luca, Graham, Trevor A. +1 more·2023·Nature Communications

Abstract

The dominant mutational signature in colorectal cancer genomes is C > T deamination (COSMIC Signature 1) and, in a small subgroup, mismatch repair signature (COSMIC signatures 6 and 44). Mutations in common colorectal cancer driver genes are often not consistent with those signatures. Here we perform whole-genome sequencing of normal colon crypts from cancer patients, matched to a previous multi-omic tumour dataset. We analyse normal crypts that were distant vs adjacent to the cancer. In contrast to healthy individuals, normal crypts of colon cancer patients have a high incidence of pks + (polyketide synthases) E.coli (Escherichia coli) mutational and indel signatures, and this is confirmed by metagenomics. These signatures are compatible with many clonal driver mutations detected in the corresponding cancer samples, including in chromatin modifier genes, supporting their role in early tumourigenesis. These results provide evidence that pks + E.coli is a potential driver of carcinogenesis in the human gut.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-023-43329-5

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • E. coli Nissle 1917 synthesizes and releases colibactin, a mutagenic substance that promotes colorectal polyposis and cancer and reduces cancer response to irinotecan.

    “having the capability of synthetizing and releasing colibactin, a mutagenic substance described to promote colorectal polyposis and cancer, and reducing cancer response to irinotecan [26, 34–39].”

    From Selection, Comparative Genomics, and Potential Probiotic Features of Escherichia coli 5C, a pks-Negative Strain Isolated from Healthy Infant Donor Feces (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes colibactin from pks+ E. coli as genotoxic, and the Discussion (page unavailable) suggests it may contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis. The paper does not identify E. coli Nissle 1917 as the strain, establish that colibactin promotes polyposis or cancer, or address response to irinotecan. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • E. coli Nissle 1917 is pks-positive.

    “the most widely used E. coli-based probiotic, known as E. coli Nissle 1917 (DSM 6601), is pks-positive.”

    From Selection, Comparative Genomics, and Potential Probiotic Features of Escherichia coli 5C, a pks-Negative Strain Isolated from Healthy Infant Donor Feces (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Introduction says some E. coli strains carry the pks island, and the Results section on pks+ genomic DNA reports detecting pks genes in patient samples. Neither identifies E. coli Nissle 1917 or DSM 6601 as pks-positive; searches for Nissle, DSM 6601, and probiotic did not find a passage establishing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Pleguezuelos-Manzano, C. et al. Mutational signature in colorectal cancer caused by genotoxic pks + E. coli. Nature 1–8 10.1038/s41586-020-2080-8 (2020). PMC8142898 32106218 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, B., Ramazzotti, D., Heide, T., Spiteri, I., Fernandez-Mateos, J., James, C., Magnani, L., Graham, T. A., & Sottoriva, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Graham, Trevor A.
  • Sottoriva, Andrea
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2023-11-29
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
7827-7827
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389148930
Cited by
74
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21
FWCI
9.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (202778/B/16/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Keywords
colorectal cancer, colorectal carcinogenesis, Escherichia coli, polyketide synthase, gut microbiota, mutational signatures, DNA mismatch repair, colonic crypts, metagenomics
MeSH terms
Colonic Neoplasms, Escherichia coli, Humans, Mutation, Colorectal Neoplasms, Carcinogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review