Cited by 148

Prediction of plasma ctDNA fraction and prognostic implications of liquid biopsy in advanced prostate cancer

Fonseca, Nicolette M., Maurice-Dror, Corinne, Herberts, Cameron, Tu, Wilson, Fan, William, Murtha, Andrew J., Kollmannsberger, Catarina, Kwan, Edmond M. +31 more·2024·Nature Communications

Abstract

No consensus strategies exist for prognosticating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Circulating tumor DNA fraction (ctDNA%) is increasingly reported by commercial and laboratory tests but its utility for risk stratification is unclear. Here, we intersect ctDNA%, treatment outcomes, and clinical characteristics across 738 plasma samples from 491 male mCRPC patients from two randomized multicentre phase II trials and a prospective province-wide blood biobanking program. ctDNA% correlates with serum and radiographic metrics of disease burden and is highest in patients with liver metastases. ctDNA% strongly predicts overall survival, progression-free survival, and treatment response independent of therapeutic context and outperformed established prognostic clinical factors. Recognizing that ctDNA-based biomarker genotyping is limited by low ctDNA% in some patients, we leverage the relationship between clinical prognostic factors and ctDNA% to develop a clinically-interpretable machine-learning tool that predicts whether a patient has sufficient ctDNA% for informative ctDNA genotyping (available online: https://www.ctDNA.org ). Our results affirm ctDNA% as an actionable tool for patient risk stratification and provide a practical framework for optimized biomarker testing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-024-45475-w

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In advanced prostate cancer, ctDNA fraction correlates with disease burden and predicts survival and treatment outcomes across therapeutic contexts.

    “In advanced prostate cancer, ctDNA fraction correlates with disease burden and predicts survival and treatment outcomes across therapeutic contexts, suggesting that liquid biopsy can contribute not only to genotyping but also to risk stratification and test triage [19].”
  • Contemporary studies demonstrate that ctDNA can complement tissue sequencing, identify non-overlapping clinically relevant alterations, and capture dynamic tumor evolution during treatment.

    “Contemporary studies demonstrate that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can complement tissue sequencing, identify non-overlapping clinically relevant alterations, and capture dynamic tumor evolution during treatment [18, 19].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. [2]Swami U McFarland TR Nussenzveig R Agarwal N Advanced prostate cancer: treatment advances and future directions Trends Cancer Res. 2020 6 702 715 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.04.010 32534790 · DOI
  2. [3]Smaletz O Nomogram for overall survival of patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer after castration J. Clin. Oncol. 2002 20 3972 3982 10.1200/JCO.2002.11.021 12351594 · DOI
  3. [4]Halabi S Updated prognostic model for predicting overall survival in first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer J. Clin. Oncol. 2014 32 671 677 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.3696 24449231 PMC3927736 · DOI
  4. [5]Armstrong AJ Garrett-Mayer E de Wit R Tannock I Eisenberger M Prediction of survival following first-line chemotherapy in men with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer Clin. Cancer Res. 2010 16 203 211 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2514 20008841 · DOI
  5. [6]Armstrong AJ Development and validation of a prognostic model for overall survival in chemotherapy-naïve men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer Ann. Oncol. 2018 29 2200 2207 10.1093/annonc/mdy406 30202945 PMC6888025 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [7]Chi KN A prognostic index model for predicting overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate after docetaxel Ann. Oncol. 2016 27 454 460 10.1093/annonc/mdv594 26685010 PMC4769990 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [8]Lorente, D. et al. Prognostic score and benefit from abiraterone in first-line metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.07.014 (2021). 34373138 · DOI
  8. [9]Crawford ED Higano CS Shore ND Hussain M Petrylak DP Treating patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer: a comprehensive review of available therapies J. Urol. 2015 194 1537 1547 10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.106 26196735 · DOI
  9. [10]Scher HI Trial design and objectives for castration-resistant prostate cancer: updated recommendations from the prostate cancer clinical trials working group 3. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016 34 1402 1418 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.2702 26903579 PMC4872347 · DOI
  10. [11]Corcoran RB Chabner BA Application of cell-free DNA analysis to cancer treatment N. Engl. J. Med. 2018 379 1754 1765 10.1056/NEJMra1706174 30380390 · DOI
  11. [12]Ignatiadis M Sledge GW Jeffrey SS Liquid biopsy enters the clinic - implementation issues and future challenges Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2021 18 297 312 10.1038/s41571-020-00457-x 33473219 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [14]Reichert ZR Prognostic value of plasma circulating tumor DNA fraction across four common cancer types: a real-world outcomes study Ann. Oncol. 2023 34 111 120 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.163 36208697 PMC9805517 · DOI
  13. [15]Kohli M Clinical and genomic insights into circulating tumor DNA-based alterations across the spectrum of metastatic hormone-sensitive and castrate-resistant prostate cancer EBioMedicine 2020 54 102728 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102728 32268276 PMC7186589 · DOI
  14. [17]Sumanasuriya S Elucidating prostate cancer behaviour during treatment via low-pass whole-genome sequencing of circulating tumour DNA Eur. Urol. 2021 80 243 253 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.030 34103179 PMC8329366 · DOI
  15. [18]Jayaram A Plasma tumor gene conversions after one cycle abiraterone acetate for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a biomarker analysis of a multicenter international trial Ann. Oncol. 2021 32 726 735 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.196 33794293 · DOI
  16. [19]Maurice-Dror C Circulating tumor DNA fraction (ctDNA%) to independently predict for clinical outcomes in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) J. Clin. Oncol. 2021 39 5049 5049 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.5049 · DOI
  17. [20]Annala M Circulating tumor DNA genomics correlate with resistance to abiraterone and enzalutamide in prostate cancer Cancer Discov. 2018 8 444 457 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0937 29367197 · DOI
  18. [21]Annala M Evolution of castration-resistant prostate cancer in ctDNA during sequential androgen receptor pathway inhibition Clin. Cancer Res. 2021 27 4610 4623 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1625 34083234 · DOI
  19. [22]Nørgaard M Prognostic value of low-pass whole genome sequencing of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer Clin. Chem. 2023 69 386 398 10.1093/clinchem/hvac224 36762756 · DOI
  20. [23]Tukachinsky H Genomic analysis of circulating tumor DNA in 3,334 patients with advanced prostate cancer identifies targetable BRCA alterations and AR resistance mechanisms Clin. Cancer Res. 2021 27 3094 3105 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4805 33558422 PMC9295199 · DOI
  21. [24]Sumiyoshi T Chi KN Wyatt AW Clinical implications of genomic alterations in metastatic prostate cancer Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 24 310 322 10.1038/s41391-020-00308-x 33452452 · DOI
  22. [25]Casanova-Salas I Quantitative and qualitative analysis of blood-based liquid biopsies to inform clinical decision-making in prostate cancer Eur. Urol. 2021 79 762 771 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.037 33422353 PMC8941682 · DOI
  23. [26]Herberts C Wyatt AW Technical and biological constraints on ctDNA-based genotyping Trends Cancer Res. 2021 7 995 1009 10.1016/j.trecan.2021.06.001 34219051 · DOI
  24. [27]Pascual J ESMO recommendations on the use of circulating tumour DNA assays for patients with cancer: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group Ann. Oncol. 2022 33 750 768 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.520 35809752 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [28]Kwan EM Wyatt AW Chi KN Towards clinical implementation of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic prostate cancer: Opportunities for integration and pitfalls to interpretation Front. Oncol. 2022 12 1054497 10.3389/fonc.2022.1054497 36439451 PMC9685669 · DOI
  26. [29]Adalsteinsson VA Scalable whole-exome sequencing of cell-free DNA reveals high concordance with metastatic tumors Nat. Commun. 2017 8 1324 10.1038/s41467-017-00965-y 29109393 PMC5673918 · DOI
  27. [30]Khalaf DJ Optimal sequencing of enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2, crossover trial Lancet Oncol. 2019 20 1730 1739 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30688-6 31727538 · DOI
  28. [31]Malangone-Monaco E Real-world treatment patterns among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the US J. Clin. Oncol. 2022 40 49 49 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.049 · DOI
  29. [32]Shayegan B Real-world use of systemic therapies in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in Canada Urol. Oncol. 2022 40 192 192 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.01.009 35216890 · DOI
  30. [33]Jensen K Association of clonal hematopoiesis in DNA repair genes with prostate cancer plasma cell-free DNA testing interference JAMA Oncol. 2021 7 107 110 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5161 33151258 PMC7645740 · DOI
  31. [34]Woodhouse R Clinical and analytical validation of FoundationOne Liquid CDx, a novel 324-Gene cfDNA-based comprehensive genomic profiling assay for cancers of solid tumor origin PLoS One 2020 15 e0237802 10.1371/journal.pone.0237802 32976510 PMC7518588 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [35]Bettegowda C Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies Sci. Transl. Med. 2014 6 224ra24 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007094 24553385 PMC4017867 · DOI · Paper page
  33. [36]Abbosh C Phylogenetic ctDNA analysis depicts early-stage lung cancer evolution Nature 2017 545 446 451 10.1038/nature22364 28445469 PMC5812436 · DOI
  34. [37]Choudhury AD Tumor fraction in cell-free DNA as a biomarker in prostate cancer JCI Insight 2018 3 e122109 10.1172/jci.insight.122109 30385733 PMC6238737 · DOI
  35. [38]Schweizer MT Clinical determinants for successful circulating tumor DNA analysis in prostate cancer Prostate 2019 79 701 708 10.1002/pros.23778 30865311 PMC6589085 · DOI
  36. [39]Avanzini S A mathematical model of ctDNA shedding predicts tumor detection size Sci. Adv. 2020 6 eabc4308 10.1126/sciadv.abc4308 33310847 PMC7732186 · DOI
  37. [40]Jee, J. et al. Overall survival with circulating tumor DNA-guided therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat. Med. 28, 2353–2363 (2022). PMC10338177 36357680
  38. [41]Chabon JJ Integrating genomic features for non-invasive early lung cancer detection Nature 2020 580 245 251 10.1038/s41586-020-2140-0 32269342 PMC8230734 · DOI
  39. [42]Alumkal JJ Effect of visceral disease site on outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with enzalutamide in the PREVAIL trial Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 2017 15 610 617.e3 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.02.007 28344102 · DOI
  40. [43]Fonseca NM Genomic features of lung-recurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 6 e2100543 10.1200/PO.21.00543 35507889 · DOI
  41. [44]Halabi S Meta-analysis evaluating the impact of site of metastasis on overall survival in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer J. Clin. Oncol. 2016 34 1652 1659 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.7270 26951312 PMC4872320 · DOI · Paper page
  42. [46]Claps G The multiple roles of LDH in cancer Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2022 19 749 762 10.1038/s41571-022-00686-2 36207413 · DOI · Paper page
  43. [47]Sweeney CJ Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 373 737 746 10.1056/NEJMoa1503747 26244877 PMC4562797 · DOI
  44. [48]Antonarakis ES Clinical and pathological features associated with circulating tumor DNA content in real-world patients with metastatic prostate cancer Prostate 2022 82 867 875 10.1002/pros.24331 35286728 PMC9314037 · DOI
  45. [49]Sayegh, N., Swami, U. & Agarwal, N. Recent advances in the management of metastatic prostate cancer. JCO Oncol. Pract.18, 45–55 (2022). 34473525
  46. [50]Tolmeijer, S. H. et al. Early on-treatment changes in circulating tumor DNA fraction and response to enzalutamide or abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 29, 2835–2844 (2023). 36996325
  47. [51]Mehra, N. et al. Plasma cell-free DNA concentration and outcomes from taxane therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer from two phase III trials (FIRSTANA and PROSELICA). Eur. Urol.74, 283–291 (2018). PMC6090941 29500065
  48. [52]Cousin S Tumor fraction to improve patient selection for oncology early phase clinical trials: Analysis of two precision medicine studies J. Clin. Oncol. 2023 41 3005 3005 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.3005 · DOI
  49. [53]Kurtz DM Enhanced detection of minimal residual disease by targeted sequencing of phased variants in circulating tumor DNA Nat. Biotechnol. 2021 39 1537 1547 10.1038/s41587-021-00981-w 34294911 PMC8678141 · DOI
  50. [54]Zviran A Genome-wide cell-free DNA mutational integration enables ultra-sensitive cancer monitoring Nat. Med. 2020 26 1114 1124 10.1038/s41591-020-0915-3 32483360 PMC8108131 · DOI
  51. [55]Jamshidi A Evaluation of cell-free DNA approaches for multi-cancer early detection Cancer Cell. 2022 40 1537 1549 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.10.022 36400018 · DOI
  52. [56]Eisenhauer EA New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur. J. Cancer 2009 45 228 247 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 19097774 · DOI · Paper page
  53. [57]Loh JW All-FIT: allele-frequency-based imputation of tumor purity from high-depth sequencing data Bioinformatics 2020 36 2173 2180 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz865 31750888 PMC7141867 · DOI
  54. [58]Orlando F Allele-informed copy number evaluation of plasma DNA samples from metastatic prostate cancer patients: the PCF_SELECT consortium assay NAR Cancer 2022 4 zcac016 10.1093/narcan/zcac016 35664542 PMC9154344 · DOI
  55. [60]Chi KN Phase 3 MAGNITUDE study: First results of niraparib (NIRA) with abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with and without homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations J. Clin. Oncol. 2022 40 12 12 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.012 · DOI
  56. [61]de Bono J Olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer N. Engl. J. Med. 2020 382 2091 2102 10.1056/NEJMoa1911440 32343890 · DOI · Paper page
  57. [62]Shen SY Sensitive tumour detection and classification using plasma cell-free DNA methylomes Nature 2018 563 579 583 10.1038/s41586-018-0703-0 30429608 · DOI · Paper page
  58. [63]Sweeney C Ipatasertib plus abiraterone and prednisolone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (IPATential150): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial Lancet 2021 398 131 142 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00580-8 34246347 · DOI
  59. [64]Bayle, A. et al. Liquid versus tissue biopsy for detecting actionable alterations according to ESCAT in patients with advanced cancer: a study from the French National Center for Precision Medicine (PRISM). Ann. Oncol. 33, 1328–1331 (2022). 36122799
  60. [65]Herberts C Deep whole-genome ctDNA chronology of treatment-resistant prostate cancer Nature 2022 608 199 208 10.1038/s41586-022-04975-9 35859180 · DOI
  61. [66]Vandekerkhove G Plasma ctDNA is a tumor tissue surrogate and enables clinical-genomic stratification of metastatic bladder cancer Nat. Commun. 2021 12 184 10.1038/s41467-020-20493-6 33420073 PMC7794518 · DOI
  62. [67]Tug S Exercise-induced increases in cell free DNA in human plasma originate predominantly from cells of the haematopoietic lineage Exerc. Immunol. Rev. 2015 21 164 173 25826002
  63. [68]Madsen AT Hojbjerg JA Sorensen BS Winther-Larsen A Day-to-day and within-day biological variation of cell-free DNA EBioMedicine 2019 49 284 290 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.10.008 31648993 PMC6945267 · DOI
  64. [69]Fridlich O Elevated cfDNA after exercise is derived primarily from mature polymorphonuclear neutrophils, with a minor contribution of cardiomyocytes Cell Rep. Med 2023 4 101074 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101074 37290439 PMC10313937 · DOI
  65. [70]Warner E BRCA2, ATM, and CDK12 defects differentially shape prostate tumor driver genomics and clinical aggression Clin. Cancer Res. 2021 27 1650 1662 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3708 33414135 · DOI
  66. [71]Vandekerkhove G Circulating tumor DNA abundance and potential utility in de novo metastatic prostate cancer Eur. Urol. 2019 75 667 675 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.042 30638634 · DOI
  67. [72]Tan W Dynamic changes in gene alterations during chemotherapy in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer Sci. Rep. 2022 12 4672 10.1038/s41598-022-08520-6 35304525 PMC8933498 · DOI
  68. [73]Van Loo P Allele-specific copy number analysis of tumors Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2010 107 16910 16915 10.1073/pnas.1009843107 20837533 PMC2947907 · DOI
  69. [75]Thorvaldsdóttir H Robinson JT Mesirov JP Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration Brief. Bioinform. 2013 14 178 192 10.1093/bib/bbs017 22517427 PMC3603213 · DOI · Paper page
  70. [76]Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S.-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. NeurIPS.30 (2017).
  71. [77]Crippa A The ProBio trial: molecular biomarkers for advancing personalized treatment decision in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer Trials 2020 21 579 10.1186/s13063-020-04515-8 32586393 PMC7318749 · DOI
  72. [78]De Laere B Clinical trial protocol for ProBio: an outcome-adaptive and randomised multiarm biomarker-driven study in patients with metastatic prostate cancer Eur. Urol. Focus 2022 8 1617 1621 10.1016/j.euf.2022.03.005 35317973 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fonseca, N. M., Maurice-Dror, C., Herberts, C., Tu, W., Fan, W., Murtha, A. J., Kollmannsberger, C., Kwan, E. M., Parekh, K., Schönlau, E., Bernales, C. Q., Donnellan, G., Ng, S. W. S., Sumiyoshi, T., Vergidis, J., Noonan, K., Finch, D. L., Zulfiqar, M., Miller, S., Parimi, S., Lavoie, J.-M., Hardy, E., Soleimani, M., Nappi, L., Eigl, B. J., Kollmannsberger, C., Taavitsainen, S., Nykter, M., Tolmeijer, S. H., Boerrigter, E., Mehra, N., van Erp, N. P., De Laere, B., Lindberg, J., Grönberg, H., Khalaf, D. J., Annala, M., Chi, K. N., & Wyatt, A. W.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2024-02-28
Volume
15
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723
Cited by
148
References
6
Language
en
Funders
Canadian Cancer Society Challenge Grant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review