Cited by 20Protein Structure and DynamicsSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Researchvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A general computational design strategy for stabilizing viral class I fusion proteins

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Many pathogenic viruses rely on class I fusion proteins to fuse their viral membrane with the host cell membrane. To drive the fusion process, class I fusion proteins undergo an irreversible conformational change from a metastable prefusion state to an energetically more stable postfusion state. Mounting evidence underscores that antibodies targeting the prefusion conformation are the most potent, making it a compelling vaccine candidate. Here, we establish a computational design protocol that stabilizes the prefusion state while destabilizing the postfusion conformation. With this protocol, we stabilize the fusion proteins of the RSV, hMPV, and SARS-CoV-2 viruses, testing fewer than a handful of designs. The solved structures of these designed proteins from all three viruses evidence the atomic accuracy of our approach. Furthermore, the humoral response of the redesigned RSV F protein compares to that of the recently approved vaccine in a mouse model. While the parallel design of two conformations allows the identification of energetically sub-optimal positions for one conformation, our protocol also reveals diverse molecular strategies for stabilization. Given the clinical significance of viruses using class I fusion proteins, our algorithm can substantially contribute to vaccine development by reducing the time and resources needed to optimize these immunogens.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-024-45480-z

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Doms, R. W. & Moore, J. P. HIV-1 membrane fusion: Targets of opportunity. J. Cell Biol. 151, 9–13 (2000). · DOI
  2. Moller-Tank, S. & Maury, W. Ebola virus entry: a curious and complex series of events. PLoS Pathog. 11, e1004731 (2015). · DOI
  3. Chang, A. & Dutch, R. E. Paramyxovirus fusion and entry: multiple paths to a common end. Viruses 4, 613–636 (2012). · DOI
  4. Pabis, A., Rawle, R. J. & Kasson, P. M. Influenza hemagglutinin drives viral entry via two sequential intramembrane mechanisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 7200–7207 (2020). · DOI
  5. Shang, J. et al. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 11727–11734 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Harrison, S. C. Viral membrane fusion. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 690–698 (2008). · DOI
  7. Rey, F. A. & Lok, S. M. Common features of enveloped viruses and implications for immunogen design for next-generation vaccines. Cell 172, 1319–1334 (2018). · DOI
  8. Stewart-Jones, G. B. E. E. et al. Structure-based design of a quadrivalent fusion glycoprotein vaccine for human parainfluenza virus types 1–4. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 12265–12270 (2018). · DOI
  9. Dang, H. V. et al. An antibody against the F glycoprotein inhibits Nipah and Hendra virus infections. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 980–987 (2019). · DOI
  10. Ngwuta, J. O. et al. Prefusion F-specific antibodies determine the magnitude of RSV neutralizing activity in human sera. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 309ra162 (2015). · DOI
  11. Loomis, R. J. et al. Structure-based design of Nipah Virus vaccines: a generalizable approach to paramyxovirus immunogen development. Front. Immunol. 11, 1–16 (2020). · DOI
  12. Falloon, J. et al. An adjuvanted, postfusion f protein–based vaccine did not prevent respiratory syncytial virus illness in older adults. J. Infect. Dis. 216, 1362–1370 (2017). · DOI
  13. McLellan, J. S. et al. Structure-based design of a fusion glycoprotein vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus. Science 342, 592 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Narkhede, Y. B., Gonzalez, K. J. & Strauch, E. M. Targeting viral surface proteins through structure-based design. Viruses 13, 1320 (2021). · DOI
  15. Joyce, M. G. et al. Iterative structure-based improvement of a fusion-glycoprotein vaccine against RSV. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 811–820 (2016). · DOI
  16. Rutten, L. et al. A universal approach to optimize the folding and stability of prefusion-closed HIV-1 envelope trimers. Cell Rep. 23, 584 (2018). · DOI
  17. Rutten, L. et al. Structure-based design of prefusion-stabilized Filovirus Glycoprotein Trimers. Cell Rep. 30, 4540–4550.e3 (2020). · DOI
  18. Hsieh, C. L. et al. Structure-based design of prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 Spikes. Science. 369, 1501–1505 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Wong, J. J. W., Paterson, R. G., Lamb, R. A. & Jardetzky, T. S. Structure and stabilization of the Hendra virus F glycoprotein in its prefusion form. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 1056–1061 (2016). · DOI
  20. Battles, M. B. et al. Structure and immunogenicity of pre-fusion-stabilized human metapneumovirus F glycoprotein. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–11 (2017). · DOI
  21. Davey, J. A. & Chica, R. A. Multistate approaches in computational protein design. Protein Sci. 21, 1241–1252 (2012). · DOI
  22. Leaver-Fay, A., Jacak, R., Stranges, P. B. & Kuhlman, B. A generic program for multistate protein design. PLoS One 6, e20937 (2011). · DOI
  23. Tian, D. et al. Structural basis of respiratory syncytial virus subtype-dependent neutralization by an antibody targeting the fusion glycoprotein. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–7 (2017). · DOI
  24. Park, H. et al. Simultaneous optimization of biomolecular energy functions on features from small molecules and macromolecules. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12, 6201–6212 (2016). · DOI
  25. Hsieh, C.-L. et al. Structure-based design of prefusion-stabilized human metapneumovirus fusion proteins. Nat. Commun. 2022 131 13, 1–11 (2022).
  26. Kwakkenbos, M. J. et al. Generation of stable monoclonal antibody-producing B cell receptor-positive human memory B cells by genetic programming. Nat. Med. 16, 123–128 (2010). · DOI
  27. Gilman, M. S. A. A. et al. Characterization of a prefusion-specific antibody that recognizes a quaternary, cleavage-dependent epitope on the RSV fusion Glycoprotein. PLoS Pathog. 11, 1–17 (2015). · DOI
  28. Corti, D. et al. Cross-neutralization of four paramyxoviruses by a human monoclonal antibody. Nature 501, 439–443 (2013). · DOI
  29. Huang, J., Diaz, D. & Mousa, J. J. Antibody recognition of the Pneumovirus fusion protein trimer interface. bioRxiv 30602, 2020.05.20.107508 (2020). · DOI
  30. Chan, K. K. et al. Engineering human ACE2 to optimize binding to the spike protein of SARS coronavirus 2. Science. 369, 1261–1265 (2020). · DOI
  31. Wrapp, D. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science. 367, 1260–1263 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  32. Mclellan, J. S., Yang, Y., Graham, B. S. & Kwong, P. D. Structure of respiratory syncytial virus fusion glycoprotein in the postfusion conformation reveals preservation of neutralizing epitopes. J. Virol. 85, 7788–7796 (2011). · DOI
  33. Jones, H. G. et al. Alternative conformations of a major antigenic site on RSV F. PLoS Pathog. 15, e1007944 (2019). · DOI
  34. Anderson, L. J., Bingham, P. & Hierholzer, J. C. Neutralization of respiratory syncytial virus by individual and mixtures of F and G protein monoclonal antibodies. J. Virol. 62, 4232 (1988). · DOI
  35. Rutten, L. et al. Structure-based design of prefusion-stabilized filovirus glycoprotein trimers. Cell Rep. 30, 19–21 (2020). · DOI
  36. Sevy, A. M. et al. Multistate design of influenza antibodies improves affinity and breadth against seasonal viruses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1597–1602 (2019). · DOI
  37. Löffler, P., Schmitz, S., Hupfeld, E., Sterner, R. & Merkl, R. Rosetta:MSF: a modular framework for multi-state computational protein design. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005600 (2017). · DOI
  38. Wang, R. Y. R. et al. Automated structure refinement of macromolecular assemblies from cryo-EM maps using Rosetta. Elife 5, e17219 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  39. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  40. Tyka, M. D. et al. Alternate states of proteins revealed by detailed energy landscape mapping. J. Mol. Biol. 405, 607–618 (2011). · DOI
  41. Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  42. Más, V. et al. Engineering, structure and immunogenicity of the human metapneumovirus f protein in the postfusion conformation. PLOS Pathog. 12, e1005859 (2016). · DOI
  43. Walls, A. C. et al. Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell 181, 281–292.e6 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  44. Song, Y. et al. High-resolution comparative modeling with RosettaCM. Structure 21, 1735–1742 (2013). · DOI
  45. Lan, J. et al. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature 581, 215–220 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  46. Xia, S. et al. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion. Cell Res. 30, 343–355 (2020). · DOI
  47. Fleishman, S. J. et al. Rosettascripts: A scripting language interface to the Rosetta Macromolecular modeling suite. PLoS One 6, e20161 (2011). · DOI
  48. Maguire, J. B. et al. Perturbing the energy landscape for improved packing during computational protein design. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinforma. 89, 1–14 (2020).
  49. Bhardwaj, G. et al. Accurate de novo design of hyperstable constrained peptides. Nature 538, 329–335 (2016). · DOI
  50. Huang, J. et al. Structure, immunogenicity, and conformation-dependent receptor binding of the postfusion human Metapneumovirus F protein. J. Virol. 95, 593–614 (2021). · DOI
  51. Banerjee, A. et al. Structural basis for ultrapotent antibody-mediated neutralization of human metapneumovirus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, 1–9 (2022). · DOI
  52. Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  53. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  54. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  55. Sanchez-Garcia, R., Gomez-Blanco, J., Cuervo, A., Carazo, J. M. & Vargas, J. DeepEMhacer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing. Communications Biology 4, 874 (2021). · DOI
  56. Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C. & Ferrin, T. E. Visualizing density maps with UCSF Chimera. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 281–287 (2007). · DOI
  57. Stokes, K. L. et al. Differential pathogenesis of respiratory syncytial virus clinical isolates in BALB/c Mice. J. Virol. 85, 5782–5793 (2011). · DOI
  58. Chávez-Bueno, S. et al. Respiratory syncytial virus-induced acute and chronic airway disease is independent of genetic background: An experimental murine model. Virol. J. 2, 1–14 (2005). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Gonzalez, K. J., Huang, J., Criado, M. F., Banerjee, A., Tompkins, S. M., Mousa, J. J., & Strauch, E.-M.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Strauch, Eva-Maria
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2024-02-13
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
1335-1335
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391776152
Cited by
20
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI140245)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
class I fusion proteins, computational protein design, RSV F protein, human metapneumovirus, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, vaccine immunogens, humoral immune response, viral fusion, conformational change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review