Cited by 147Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Towards building multilingual language model for medicine

Open access
Qiu, Pengcheng, Wu, Chaoyi, Zhang, Xiaoman, Lin, Weixiong, Wang, Haicheng, Zhang, Ya, Wang, Yanfeng, Xie, Weidi·2024·Nature Communications

Abstract

The development of open-source, multilingual medical language models can benefit a wide, linguistically diverse audience from different regions. To promote this domain, we present contributions from the following: First, we construct a multilingual medical corpus, containing approximately 25.5B tokens encompassing 6 main languages, termed as MMedC, enabling auto-regressive domain adaptation for general LLMs; Second, to monitor the development of multilingual medical LLMs, we propose a multilingual medical multi-choice question-answering benchmark with rationale, termed as MMedBench; Third, we have assessed a number of open-source large language models (LLMs) on our benchmark, along with those further auto-regressive trained on MMedC. Our final model, MMed-Llama 3, with only 8B parameters, achieves superior performance compared to all other open-source models on both MMedBench and English benchmarks, even rivaling GPT-4. In conclusion, in this work, We present a large-scale corpus, a benchmark and a series of models to support the development of multilingual medical LLMs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-024-52417-z

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All results were obtained using a 3-shot prompting strategy except for MCQA tasks, where a zero-shot prompting setting was used to align with previous studies.

    “All results presented here were obtained using a 3-shot prompting strategy (more details in the “Evaluation Settings” section in Supplementary), except for MCQA tasks, where we used a zero-shot prompting setting to align with previous studies7,8,19.”
  • MMedIns-Llama 3's superior multilingual rationale performance is likely due to its base language model (MMed-Llama 3) being initially developed to be multilingual.

    “This superior performance is likely due to the fact that our base language model (MMed-Llama 3) was initially developed to be multilingual19.”
  • Further auto-regressive training on medical-related corpus can inject medical knowledge into models, allowing them to perform better in different downstream tasks.

    “We take the same approach as our previous work7,19, which have shown that further auto-regressive training on medical-elated corpus can inject medical knowledge into the models, thus allowing them to perform better in different downstream tasks.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [11]Zhang, T., Kishore, V., Wu, F., Weinberger, K. Q., Artzi, Y. Bertscore: evaluating text generation with bert. In International Conference on Learning Representations (2019).
  2. [36]Brown, T. et al. Language models are few-shot learners. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M.F. Balcan, and H. Lin, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 1877–1901. Curran Associates, Inc. (2020).
  3. [37]Kim, S. et al. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 12685–12708, (2023).
  4. [47]Pal, A., Umapathi, Logesh Kumar, and Sankarasubbu, M. Medmcqa: a large-scale multi-subject multi-choice dataset for medical domain question answering. In Gerardo Flores, George H Chen, Tom Pollard, Joyce C Ho, Tristan Naumann, editors, Proceedings of the Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning, volume 174 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 248–260. PMLR, 07–08 Apr 2022.
  5. [52]Qiu, P. et al. Towards building multilingual language model for medicine. 10.5281/zenodo.12748399 (2024). 39333468 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qiu, P., Wu, C., Zhang, X., Lin, W., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Xie, W.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Yanfeng
  • Xie, Weidi
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2024-09-27
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
8384-8384
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402923149
Cited by
147
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 10
FWCI
21.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (21DZ1100100, 22511106101, BP0719010, 18DZ2270700)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
open-source large language models, low-resource languages, medical question answering
MeSH terms
Humans, Language, Natural Language Processing, Multilingualism, Benchmarking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review